UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington,

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment (Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant 
  Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material under §240, Rule
14a-12
Targa Resources Corp.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
Targa Resources Corp.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b)
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) Rules
14a-6(i)(1)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

0-11


TARGA RESOURCES CORP.

811 Louisiana Street

|Suite 2100

|Houston, Texas 77002

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To the Stockholders of Targa Resources Corp.:

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Targa Resources Corp. (the “Company” or “Targa”) will be held at 811 Louisiana Street, Suite 2100, Houston, TX 77002 on May 25, 2021,16, 2024, at 8:00 a.m. Central Time (the “Annual Meeting”). The Annual Meeting is being held for the following purposes:

 

 1.

To elect the fivethree Class II Directors named in this proxy statement, each to serve until the 20242027 annual meeting of stockholders.stockholders (Proposal One).

 

 2.

To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2021.2024 (Proposal Two).

 

 3.

To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.2023 (Proposal Three).

 

 4.

To approve an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance to 450,000,000 shares.

5.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

These proposals are described in the accompanying proxy materials. You will be able to vote at the Annual Meeting only if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March 29, 2021.19, 2024.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

Please vote over the internet at www.AALVote.com/TRGP or by phone at 1-866-804-9616 promptly so that your shares may be voted in accordance with your wishes and so we may have a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Alternatively, if you did not receive a paper copy of the proxy materials (which includes the proxy card), you may request a paper proxy card, which you may complete, sign and return by mail.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

LOGO

Regina L. Gregory

Secretary

Houston, Texas

April 1, 2021

LOGO

Gerald R. Shrader    

Houston, Texas           
SECRETARYMarch 21, 2024

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 25, 2021:May 16, 2024:

OUR PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 20212024 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND OUR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K ARE AVAILABLE AT http:HTTP://www.viewproxy.com/Targa/2021.WWW.VIEWPROXY.COM/TARGA/2024.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


TARGA RESOURCES CORP.

(the “Company”)

811 Louisiana Street

Suite 2100

Houston, Texas 77002

PROXY STATEMENT

2021

PROXY STATEMENT 2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

3

QUORUM AND VOTING

5

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

7

SUSTAINABILITY AT TARGA

8

PROPOSAL ONE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

10

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

11

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS

18

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

21

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

27

2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM SNAPSHOT

30

OUR DECISION MAKING PROCESS

33

2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM IN DETAIL

34

OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PRACTICES AND POLICIES

42

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

45

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

60

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

62

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

63

PROPOSAL TWO RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

66

PROPOSAL THREE ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

68
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR THE 2025 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS; IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES70

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

72

STOCKHOLDER LIST

72

PROXY MATERIALS, ANNUAL REPORT AND OTHER INFORMATION

73

INTERNET AND PHONE VOTING

74

APPENDIX A

75


TARGA RESOURCES CORP. (the “Company”)

811 Louisiana Street | Suite 2100 | Houston, Texas 77002

PROXY STATEMENT

2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors” or “Board”) is providing the information in this proxy statement to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) that will be held May 25, 2021,16, 2024, at 8:00 a.m. Central Time, at 811 Louisiana Street, Suite 2100, Houston, TX 77002. By submitting your proxy card, you authorize the persons named on the proxy card to represent you and vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. Those persons will also be authorized to vote your shares to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time and to vote your shares at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.

We encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote in person. Only stockholders of the Company (or their authorized representatives) and the Company’s invited guests may attend the Annual Meeting. All attendees should be prepared to present government-issued photo identification (such as a driver’s license or passport) for admittance. If you are not present at the Annual Meeting, your shares may be voted only by a person to whom you have given a proper proxy. You may revoke your proxy in writing at any time before it is exercised at the Annual Meeting by delivering to the Secretary of the Company a written notice of the revocation, by submitting your vote electronically through the internet or by phone after the grant of your proxy, or by signing and delivering to the Secretary of the Company a proxy card with a later date. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not revoke your proxy unless you give written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company before your proxy is exercised or unless you vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting.

We intend to hold theElectronic Availability of Proxy Statement and Annual Meeting in person. However, we are continuing to actively monitor the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and related governmental restrictions; we are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our stockholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold the Annual Meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the meeting partially or solely by means of remote communication. Please monitor our Annual Meeting website at http://www.viewproxy.com/Targa/2021 for updated information.

ELECTRONIC AVAILABILITY OF PROXY STATEMENT AND ANNUAL REPORTReport

As permitted under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company is making this proxy statement and its Annual Report on Form 10-K available to its stockholders electronically via the internet. The Company is sending on or about April 8, 2021,March 21, 2024, a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to its stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 29, 2021,19, 2024, which Notice will include (i) instructions on how to access the Company’s proxy materials electronically, (ii) the date, time and location of the Annual Meeting, (iii) a description of the matters intended to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, (iv) a list of the materials being made available electronically, (v) instructions on how a stockholder can request to receive paper or e-mail copies of the Company’s proxy materials, (vi) any control/identification numbers that a stockholder needs to access his or her proxy card and instructions on how to access the proxy card, and (vii) information about attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

1


Stockholders of Record and Beneficial Owners

Most of the Company’s stockholders hold their shares through a broker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

Stockholders of Record.Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice is being sent directly to you by our agent. As a stockholder of record, you have the right to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail instead of the Notice, the proxy materials include a proxy card for the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice will be forwarded to you by your bank, broker or nominee. The bank, broker or nominee is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker how to vote. Beneficial owners that receive the Notice by mail from the stockholder of record should follow the instructions included in the Notice to

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S3


view the proxy statement and transmit voting instructions. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail instead of the Notice, the proxy materials include a voting instruction card for the Annual Meeting. To vote electronically over the Internetinternet or by telephone, you should follow the instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other nominee.

If you are a beneficial owner and want to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting, you will need to ask your bank, broker or other nominee to furnish you with a legal proxy. You will not be able to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting without a legal proxy provided by your bank, broker or other nominee.

If you are a beneficial owner, you must follow the instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other nominee to revoke prior voting instructions. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not revoke your vote unless you obtain a legal proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee and you vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S4

2


QUORUM AND VOTING

Voting Stock. The Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“common stock”), is the only class of securities that entitles holders to vote generally at meetings of the Company’s stockholders. Each share of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote. Following the Annual Meeting, voting results will be tabulated and certified by the inspector of elections appointed by the Board and timely announced by the Company.

Record Date.Date. The record date for stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting will be the close of business on March 29, 2021.19, 2024. As of the record date, there were a total of 228,654,590222,535,258 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting.

Quorum and Adjournments. Adjournments. The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote generally in the election of directors at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting.

If a quorum is not present, a majority of the stockholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting have the power to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time, without notice other than an announcement at the Annual Meeting,as required by applicable law, until a quorum is present. At any adjourned Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the Annual Meeting as originally notified.

Vote Required. The votes required to pass each proposal is as follows:

 

Proposal

 

Required Vote

for Approval

 

Broker Discretionary
Voting
and Impact of
Broker Non-
Non-Votes

Votes

 

Impact of

Abstentions

ONE

(Election of
Directors)

 

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote with respect to that director’s election (meaning that the number of the votes cast “for” a director’s election must exceed the number of the votes cast “against” that director’s election).

 

Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal.

 

Broker non-votes are not considered votes cast and do not affect the outcome.

 Abstentions are not considered votes cast and do not affect the outcome.

TWO

(Ratification
of the
Selection
of
Independent
Auditors)

 

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote.vote on the matter.

 

Brokers have discretionary authority in the absence of timely instructions from their customers to vote on this proposal. As a result, there will be no broker non-votes with respect to this proposal.

 

Abstentions are treated as present and entitled to vote on the matter and will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.

THREE

(Advisory
Vote to
Approve
the
Compensation

of Named

Executive
Officers)

 

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote.vote on the matter.

 

This advisory vote is not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board. However, the Compensation Committee and the Board will take into account the result of the vote when determining future executive compensation programs.

 

Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal.

 

Broker non-votes are not entitled to vote and do not affect the outcome.

 

Abstentions are treated as present and entitled to vote on the matter and will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.

 

3


Proposal

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S
  

Required Vote for Approval

Broker Discretionary Voting
and Impact of Broker Non-

Votes

Impact of Abstentions

FOUR
(Approval of an amendment
to the Company’s Amended
and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to increase
the number of shares of
common stock authorized for
issuance to 450,000,000

shares)
The affirmative vote of holders of at least 66 2/3% of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote.Brokers have discretionary authority in the absence of timely instructions from their customers to vote on this proposal. As a result, there will be no broker non-votes with respect to this proposal.Abstentions are treated as entitled to vote and will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.5


If your shares of common stock are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you will receive instructions from that holder of record that you must follow in order for your shares to be voted at the Annual Meeting. Brokers who hold shares in street name for customers are required to vote shares in accordance with instructions received from the beneficial owners.

Default Voting.Voting. A proxy card that is properly completed and submitted will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions on the proxy card. If you properly complete and submit a proxy card, but do not indicate any contrary voting instructions, your shares will be voted consistent with the Board of Directors’ recommendation as follows:

 

FOR the election of the five persons named in this proxy statement as the Board of Directors’ nominees for election as Class II Directors, each to serve until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders.

FOR the election of the three persons named in this proxy statement as the Board of Directors’ nominees for election as Class II Directors, each to serve until the 2027 annual meeting of stockholders (Proposal One).

 

FOR the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2021.

FOR the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2024 (Proposal Two).

 

FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

FOR the approval of an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance to 450,000,000 shares.

FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC (Proposal Three).

If any other business properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the meeting, your shares will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the holders of your proxy. The Board of Directors knows of no matters, other than those previously stated, to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S6

4


SUSTAINABILITY AND ESGBUSINESS OVERVIEW

 

LOGO

At Targa (NYSE: TRGP) is a publicly traded Delaware corporation formed in October 2005. Targa is a leading provider of midstream services and is one of the largest independent midstream infrastructure companies in North America. We own, operate, acquire, and develop a diversified portfolio of complementary domestic midstream infrastructure assets.

Our Operations

We are engaged primarily in the business of:

gathering, compressing, treating, processing, transporting, and purchasing and selling natural gas;

transporting, storing, fractionating, treating, and purchasing and selling natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) and NGL products, including services to LPG exporters; and

gathering, storing, terminaling, and purchasing and selling crude oil.

To provide these services, we striveoperate in two primary segments: (i) Gathering and Processing, and (ii) Logistics and Transportation (also referred to conduct our business safelyas the Downstream Business).

Our Gathering and with integrity, creating lasting benefitsProcessing segment includes assets used in the gathering and/or purchase and sale of natural gas produced from oil and gas wells, removing impurities and processing this raw natural gas into merchantable natural gas by extracting NGLs; and assets used for our stakeholders, including investors, lenders, customers, employees, business partners, regulators,the gathering and terminaling and/or purchase and sale of crude oil. The Gathering and Processing segment’s assets are located in the Permian Basin of West Texas and Southeast New Mexico (including the Midland, Central and Delaware Basins); the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas; the Barnett Shale in North Texas; the Anadarko, Ardmore, and Arkoma Basins in Oklahoma (including the SCOOP and STACK) and South Central Kansas; the Williston Basin in North Dakota (including the Bakken and Three Forks plays); and the communities in which we liveonshore and work. We are proud to be partnear offshore regions of the energy infrastructure that is delivering safe, reliable energy to industry, farmers,Louisiana Gulf Coast and communities across America.the Gulf of Mexico.

Our operations connect U.S.Logistics and Transportation segment includes the activities and assets necessary to convert mixed NGLs into NGL products and also includes other assets and value-added services such as transporting, storing, fractionating, terminaling, and marketing of NGLs and NGL products, including services to LPG exporters and certain natural gas supply and marketing activities in support of our other businesses. The Logistics and Transportation segment also includes the Grand Prix NGL Pipeline, which connects our gathering and processing positions in the Permian Basin, Southern Oklahoma and North Texas with our Downstream facilities in Mont Belvieu, Texas. Our Downstream facilities are located predominantly in Mont Belvieu and Galena Park, Texas, and in Lake Charles, Louisiana.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S7


SUSTAINABILITY AT TARGA

LOGO

Targa Resources Corp. is one of the largest independent midstream infrastructure companies in North America. As a predominately natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL) supply to markets where there is growing demand for cleaner fuel and feedstocks. We believe that natural gas, NGLs and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) are part of the solution to reducing the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. Natural gas, NGLs, and LPG are playing a meaningful role globally in improving public health and the environment with about half of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions compared to coal combustion. The increasing use of natural gas has helped the U.S. lower its emissions even as the economy has grown over the last 15 years. Globally, where electricity is not available, the use of LPGs for fuel has a positive impact on the health and prosperity for local people in less industrialized nations.

Safety - At Targa, safety is a core value. We believe that “Zero is Achievable” and our goal is to operate and deliver our products without any injuries. We continually seek to maintain and deepen our safety culture by providing a safe working environment that encourages active employee engagement. To protect our employees, contractors, and surrounding community from workplace hazards and risks, Targa implements and maintains an integrated system of policies, practices, and controls.

Operational Excellence - We recognize that operating our assets, including thousands of miles of pipelines, natural gas processing facilities, and NGL fractionation and distribution facilities, is a great responsibility. Throughout our organization,focused energy infrastructure company, we are committed to maintaining our reputation as a responsible and operating ourreliable operator of critical energy infrastructure.

We strive to safely and reliably operate a strong and diversified portfolio of gathering, processing, logistics, and transportation assets. Our assets connect natural gas and NGLs to domestic and international markets as part of an integrated energy value chain that is designed to deliver affordable and reliable energy for everything from electricity, dependable home heating and cooling, transportation fuel, and products that touch lives every day.

Targa’s products help to provide necessary, affordable, reliable, and dependable sources of energy and feedstocks that meet the world’s growing energy demand. We believe that, for many in the world today, natural gas and NGLs help provide critical access to the infrastructure, employment, clean water and food, education, and healthcare that all people deserve. Our mission is to safely efficiently, anddeliver energy, including to energy-poor areas of the world, in ana more environmentally responsible manner. We invest each year in integrity management, maintenance,way, caring for and environmental programs. Wherever we operate, we strive to conduct our business with attention tobeing stewards of the environment and to manage risks to enable sustainable business growth.environment.

Integrity and CodeAs part of Conduct - Our actions are guided by Targa’s Code of Conduct, the overarching policy that empowers us to commit to ethics, integrity, and compliance. Targa’s Code of Conduct establishes the high standard of ethical conduct that our employees are expected to follow and outlines how everyday behavior is expected to align with our core values. We further reinforce our commitment through adherence to our policies and practices, as well as through Code of Conduct annual training.

Throughout our organization, we are committed to operating safely, with excellence and high integrity. This is a commitment that starts with and is maintained by our Board of Directors, where the full Board holds the senior management team accountable for implementing our sustainability and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) objectives, including through administration of the Company’s annual incentive program.

ESG and sustainability remain a core Board agenda item, with metrics and focus topics discussed at each quarterly meeting led by different members of the cross-functional team supporting our ESG efforts. Our performance on sustainability factors played a role in 2020 compensation decisions and will continue to play a role in the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of annual incentive compensation. To further develop and advance our goals and approachDirectors’ continued commitment to sustainability, Targa has a cross-functional sustainability working group comprised of leadership from our Environmental, Safety and Health, Operations, Engineering, Human

5


Resources, Legal, Supply Chain, Financial Accounting, Commercial, and Investor Relations departments. The coordinated efforts are led by our Senior Vice President of Sustainability and Environmental, Safety and Health (ES&H), who reports directly to our Chief Executive Officer. Our sustainability efforts are designed to generate attractive economic returns for our investors, while minimizing environmental and social impacts.

Furthermore, the Board has established a Sustainability Committee to assist the Board in overseeing our compliance with all laws, regulationsoversees environmental, social, and Company policies and procedures related to material ESGsustainability matters, including governance in relation to such matters, and overseeingmatters. One of the committee’s purposes is to oversee management’s process for establishing and implementing a strategy to integrate sustainability into various business activities of the Company, with the goal of creating long-term stakeholder benefits. The full Board of Directors also reviews the Company’s progress at each quarterly board meeting. Our CEO and Executive Management team, including our Senior Vice President of Sustainability, oversee the development, implementation, and reporting of our environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) practices, and facilitate our enterprise risk management (“ERM”) process with participation and oversight from the Board of Directors.

Our Performance

We continue to engage with our stakeholders regarding our ESG efforts, and are proud of the progress we have made.

First, across multiple safety metrics, Targa continues to achieve our best safety performance in years, due in large part to multiyear investment in and implementation of standardized processes and digital systems, training programs, and proactive work practices. In 2022, we achieved a 26% reduction in Total Recordable Incident Rate compared to 2021, completed more than 44,000 total safety and environmental training hours, and conducted 69 formal safety audits and investigations. We strive to make safety part of everything we do and who we are as a company; for example, although we recently acquired two new businesses, we still improved our overall safety record.

Additionally, Targa continues efforts to demonstrate on-going commitment to and leadership in methane management and limiting methane loss in our systems, which includes:

Committing to reduce our methane intensity to 0.08% for our gathering and boosting segment and to 0.11% for our processing segment by 2025 as part of our membership in Our Nation’s Energy Future (ONE Future), a goal we are already well on our way to meeting with a total company methane intensity performance of 0.087% as of December 31, 2022 compared to the ONE Future goal of 0.19%;

Conducting aerial methane surveys for all of our assets, including twice in the Permian in 2023;

Performing voluntary optical gas imaging for methane leak detection quarterly at all of our compressor stations and bi-monthly at all of our gas plants;

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S8


Creating a cross-functional Methane Team to study our operations, work with third-party power providers, and collaborate with engine manufacturers to reduce our methane emissions;

Piloting continuous methane monitoring equipment at multiple facilities;

Executing power purchase agreements for long-term solar and wind in the Permian;

Installing additional electrical compression to displace the use of natural gas-fired compression as we continue to evaluate our total greenhouse gas emission reduction opportunities;

Taking active leadership roles in ONE Future with a newly elected ONE Future Board member and Technical Committee co-chair; and

Taking a proactive approach to mitigating flaring incidents by aiming to reduce flared volumes through a combination of strategic planning, collaboration, strong asset integrity and maintenance programs, and effective combustion techniques, while maintaining the safety and integrity of our operations.

Further, even as we have acquired new assets, started up new gas plants, and added additional fractionation capacity, which all increased volumes on our systems, we have been able to keep our greenhouse gas (“GHG”) intensity at or below that of the previous year. Our Low Carbon Energy Ventures team is investigating new opportunities for Targa all the time, including renewable power and carbon capture and sequestration, and is exploring other ideas that complement our strengths.

As we look forward, we will continue to strive to improve our performance, conduct our business safely and with integrity, and create long-term stockholder value.lasting benefits for all of our stakeholders.

We invite you to review our recent Sustainability Report, which is available on the Company’s website at https://www.targaresources.com/sustainability.

2021 BUSINESS OVERVIEW

The transitionsustainability. However, please note that the content of Targathat report, and other materials on our website, are not incorporated into a fully integrated midstream company with scalethis proxy statement by reference. Additionally, we may provide information in this proxy statement that is not necessarily “material” under the federal securities laws for SEC reporting purposes, but that is informed by various ESG standards and asset diversity is complete, with 2020 representingframeworks (including standards for the key inflection point inmeasurement of underlying data), and the interests of various stakeholders, which may be impacted by matters outside of our corporate life cycle. Since early 2017, we placed in-service approximately $7 billioncontrol. This proxy statement also contains forward-looking statements, which may be impacted by many risks, including those identified on our most recently filed Form 10-K. Accordingly, the actual conduct of projects,our activities, including the Grand Prix NGL Pipeline (“Grand Prix”), onesetting and pursuit of the most strategic projects since our inception. We believe our assets are not easily replicated, are locatedany goals, strategies, priorities, and initiatives discussed and forecasted in many attractive and active areas of exploration and production activity and are near key markets and logistics centers. Grand Prix connects our gathering and processing positionsthis proxy statement, may differ materially in the Permian Basin, Southern Oklahomafuture. Our approach to setting, measuring and North Texas withreporting on various emissions metrics, including our downstream facilitiesemissions-related goals, may change in Mont Belvieu, Texas and further increases our competitive capabilities to provide reliable, integrated midstream services to customers. Over the longer term, we expect our growth willfuture as methodologies for such activities continue to evolve. Moreover, under current or future approaches to setting, measuring or reporting on various emissions metrics, we may not be driven byable to meet our integrated midstream service offeringgoals and the strong position of our quality assets which will benefit from production from shale plays and by the deployment of shale exploration and production technologies in both liquids-rich natural gas and crude oil resource plays that will also provide additional opportunities for our Downstream Business.targets.

As we look forward, the next phase for Targa is to optimize our existing asset base, and to continue to invest along our core integrated value chain.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S9


PROPOSAL ONE

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

 

LOGO

6


PROPOSAL ONE

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors has nominated the following individuals for election as Class II Directors of the Company to serve for a three-year term to expire at the 20242027 annual meeting of stockholders:

Beth A. Bowman

Beth A. Bowman

Lindsey M. Cooksen

Lindsey M. Cooksen

Robert B. Evans

Joe Bob Perkins

Ershel C. Redd Jr.

Joe Bob Perkins

Mses. Bowman and Cooksen and Messrs. Evans,Mr. Perkins and Redd are currently serving as directors of the Company. Their biographical information is contained in the “Directors and Executive Officers” section below.

The Board currently consists of twelve directors. As part of our ongoing Board succession planning, Director Ershel C. Redd Jr. will not stand for reelection and announced his retirement from the Board effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting. Mr. Redd’s decision not to stand for reelection was not the result of any disagreement with the Company or any of its affiliates on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices. Our bylaws provide that the number of directors will be determined by the Board of Directors, and the number of directors is currently set at twelve. We will reduce the number of directors to eleven following the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of its nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. If a nominee becomes unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election, either the number of the Company’s directors will be reduced or the persons acting via proxy will vote for the election of a substitute nominee that the Board of Directors recommends.

Our bylaws provide that in an uncontested election, each director will be elected by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote with respect to that director’s election (meaning that the number of votes cast “for” a director’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director’s election). Pursuant to our bylaws, each incumbent director nominated for election must submit an irrevocable resignation, contingent on (i) not receiving a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election, and (ii) acceptance of that proffered resignation by the Board of Directors in accordance with the following policies and procedures. In the event an incumbent director fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election, the Nominating and Governance Committee, or such other committee designated by the Board, will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors as to whether to accept or reject the resignation of such incumbent director, or whether other action should be taken. The Board of Directors will act on the proffered resignation, taking into account such committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision regarding the resignation and, if such resignation is rejected, the rationale behind the decision within ninety days following certification of the election results. Such committee, in making its recommendation, and the Board of Directors, in making its decision, each may consider any factors and other information that they consider appropriate and relevant. The director whose resignation is being considered will not participate in the deliberations of such committee or the Board of Directors with respect to whether to accept such director’s resignation. If the director’s resignation is not accepted by the Board of Directors, such director will continue to serve until his or her successor is duly elected, or until his or her earlier resignation or removal.

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote with respect to each director’s election is required to elect that director (meaning that the number of votes cast “for” a director’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director’s election). If you own shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must instruct your bank, broker or other holder of record how to vote in order for them to vote your shares so that your vote can be counted on this proposal. Please see “Quorum and Voting—Vote Required” for further information regarding the impact of abstentions and broker non-votes.

Recommendation of our Board of Directors

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the election of each of the nominees.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S10

7


DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

After the Annual Meeting, assuming the stockholders elect the nominees of the Board of Directors as set forth in “Proposal One—Election of Directors” above, the

The Board of Directors of the Company will be, and the executive officers of the Company are:

 

Name

 
Name Age (1)

Position
 

Position

Matthew J. Meloy

4643Chief Executive Officer and Director

Patrick J. McDonie

6360President – Gathering and Processing

D. Scott Pryor

6158

President – Logistics and Transportation

Robert M. Muraro

4744Chief Commercial Officer

Jennifer R. Kneale

4542

Chief Financial Officer

 Chief Financial Officer

Regina L. GregoryGerald R. Shrader

6450Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

G. Clark White

 61Executive Vice President - Operations

Julie H. Boushka

6158

Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

Paul W. Chung

6461Chairman of the Board of Directors

Joe Bob Perkins

6360

Director

 Director

James W. Whalen

79Director

Rene R. Joyce

7673Director
 Director

Charles R. Crisp

7673

Director

 Director

Chris Tong

64Director

Ershel C. Redd Jr.(2)

76Director
 73Director

Laura C. Fulton

6057

Director

 Director

Waters S. Davis, IV

7067Director

Robert B. Evans

 72Director

Beth A. Bowman

6764

Director

 Director

Lindsey M. Cooksen

4138Director
 

R. Keith Teague

59

Director

Caron A. Lawhorn

63Director

 

(1)

Ages as of April 1, 2021.March 21, 2024.

(2)

Mr. Redd will not be standing for reelection and is retiring from the Board, effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting, and therefore will no longer be considered a member of the Board as of the date of the Annual Meeting.

Matthew J. Meloyhas served as Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company andsince March 1, 2020. He also served as a director of Targa Resources GP LLC (the “General Partner”) of Targa Resources Partners LP (the “Partnership” or “TRP”) between March 2020 and May 2021. Mr. Meloy has also served as Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner since March 1, 2020. Mr. Meloy previously served asPresident of the Company and the General Partner between March 2018 and March 2020. Mr. Meloy also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the General Partner between May 2015 and February 2018. He also served as Treasurer of the Company and the General Partner until December 2015. Mr. Meloy previously served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company between October 2010 and May 2015 and of the General Partner between December 2010 and May 2015. He also served as Vice President—Finance and Treasurer of the Company between April 2008 and October 2010, and as Director, Corporate Development of the Company between March 2006 and March 2008 and of the General Partner between March 2006 and March 2008. He served as Vice President—Finance and Treasurer of the General Partner between April 2008 and December 15, 2010. Mr. Meloy was with The Royal Bank of Scotland in the structured finance group, focusing on the energy sector from October 2003 to March 2006. Mr. Meloy’s extensive knowledge of the Company’s operational and strategic initiatives and capital investment program, attained from his service as President for two years and Chief Financial Officer for eight years, combined with his experience in the finance industry, brings operational, financial and capital markets experience to the Board.

Patrick J. McDonie has served as President—Gathering and Processing of the Company and the General Partner since March 2018. Mr. McDonie previously served as Executive Vice President—Southern Field Gathering and Processing of the Company and the General Partner between November 2015 and February 2018. He also

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S11


served as President of Atlas Pipeline Partners GP LLC (“Atlas”), which was acquired by the Partnership in February 2015, between October 2013 and February 2015. He also served as Chief Operating Officer of Atlas

8


between July 2012 and October 2013 and as Senior Vice President of Atlas between July 2012 and October 2013. He served as President of ONEOK Energy Services Company, a natural gas transportation, storage, supplier and marketing company between May 2008 and July 2012.

D. Scott Pryor has served as President—Logistics and Transportation of the Company and the General Partner, since March 2018. Mr. Pryor previously served as Executive Vice President—Logistics and Marketing of the Company and the General Partner between November 2015 and February 2018. He also served as Senior Vice President—NGL Logistics & Marketing of Targa Resources Operating LLC (“Targa Operating”) and various other subsidiaries of the Partnership between June 2014 and November 2015. He also served as Vice President of Targa Operating between July 2011 and May 2014 and has held officer positions with other Partnership subsidiaries since 2005.

Robert M. Muraro has served as Chief Commercial Officer of the Company and the General Partner since March 2018. Mr. Muraro previously served as Executive Vice President—Commercial of the Company and the General Partner between February 2017 and February 2018. He also served as Senior Vice President—Commercial and Business Development of Targa Midstream Services LLC (“Targa Midstream”) and various other subsidiaries of the Partnership between March 2016 and February 2017. He also served as Vice President—Commercial Development of Targa Midstream and various other subsidiaries of the Partnership between January 2013 and March 2016. He held the position of Director of Business Development between August 2004 and January 2013.

Jennifer R. Kneale has served as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the General Partner since March 2018. She also served as Treasurer of the Company between September 2022 and April 2023 and of the General Partner between August 2022 and April 2023. Ms. Kneale previously served as Vice President—Finance of the Company and the General Partner between December 2015 and February 2018. She also served as Senior Director, Finance of the Company and the General Partner between March 2015 and December 2015. She also served as Director, Finance of the Company and the General Partner between May 2013 and February 2015. Ms. Kneale was with Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. in its energy private equity group, TPH Partners, from September 2011 to May 2013, most recently serving as Director of Investor Relations.2013.

Regina L. GregoryGerald R. Shrader has served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company and the General Partner since March 1, 2020. Ms. Gregory previouslyDecember 2023. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Shrader served as Vice President and Assistant General Counselin various roles with subsidiaries of the Company and the General Partner between May 2019 andbeginning in March 2020 and of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries between April 2019 and March 2020. From June 2017 until joining the Company in July 2018, she was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Frontier Midstream Services IV LLC. She also served2015, most recently serving as Senior Vice President, General CounselCounsel—Southern Field G&P and Corporate Secretary for the general partner of American Midstream Partners, LP during 2016 and 2017.those subsidiaries. Prior to that, she was General Counsel, Vice President,joining Targa, Mr. Shrader served as Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary of Traverse MidstreamAtlas Pipeline Partners LP inGP, LLC from October 2009 until March 2015 and, 2016prior to that time, served in various roles with affiliates of Atlas beginning in July 2007. Prior to Atlas, Mr. Shrader worked both for publicly traded energy companies and in private practice (including the general partner of Access Midstream Partners LP (previously Chesapeake Midstream Partners LP) from 2010 through 2015. Additionally, Ms. Gregory held a numberprovision of legal positions with different companies, including the law firms of Jones Dayservices to private and Fulbright & Jaworski (now Norton Rose Fulbright)publicly traded energy companies).

G. Clark White has served as Executive Vice President—Operations of the Company and the General Partner since September 2020 and served as Executive Vice President—Engineering and Operations of the Company and the General Partner between November 2015 and September 2020. Mr. White previously served as Senior Vice President—Field G&P of Targa Operating and various other subsidiaries of the Partnership between June 2014 and November 2015. He also served as Vice President of Targa Operating between July 2011 and May 2014 and has held officer positions with other Partnership subsidiaries since 2003.

Julie H. Boushka has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company and the General Partner since March 2019. Ms. Boushka previously served as Vice President—Controller of the Company, the General Partner and various subsidiaries of the Company between February 2017 and February 2019. She also served as Assistant Controller—Financial Accounting of the Company and the General Partner between November 2016 and February 2017. Ms. Boushka served as a Senior Vice President for Financial Planning and the Chief Risk Officer for Columbia Pipeline Group (“CPG”) between June 2015 and August 2016,

9


where she was responsible for the financial planning function and managing enterprise risk. She also served as the Business Unit Chief Financial Officer of CPG between May 2013 and June 2015, where she was responsible for the accounting and financial planning functions. Prior to that, Ms. Boushka spent approximately 18 years in various roles at El Paso Corporation (and its predecessor, Tenneco, Inc.), including accounting, financial reporting and business development.

Paul W. Chunghas served as a director and Chairman of the Board of the Company since January 1, 2021. Mr. Chung previously served as a director and Chairman of the Board of the General Partner sincebetween January 1,2021 and May 2021. From March 2020 until December 31, 2020, he served as Executive Vice President and Senior Legal Advisor of the Company. From May 2004 to March 2020, Mr. Chung served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company and its predecessor entities and of the General Partner since its formation. From 1999 to May 2004, he served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of various Shell Oil

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S12


Company (“Shell”) affiliates, including Coral Energy, LLC and Shell Trading North America Company. In these positions, Mr. Chung was responsible for all legal and regulatory affairs. From 1996 to 1999, he served as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of Tejas Gas Corporation (“Tejas”).Corporation. Prior to 1996, Mr. Chung held a number of legal positions with different companies, including the law firm of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. Mr. Chung’s knowledge of the Company, together with his background in the energy industry and his legal and regulatory experience, enable Mr. Chung to provide a valuable and distinct perspective to the Board on a range of business and management matters.

Joe Bob Perkins has served as a director of the Company and the General Partner since January 2012. Mr. Perkins previously served as Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company and the General Partner between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, and as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the General Partner between January 2012 and March 2020.2020, and as a director of the General Partner between January 2012 and May 2021. He also served as President of the Company between the date of its formation onin October 2005 and December 2011. Prior to 2005, Mr. Perkins served predecessor Targa companies as President since their founding in 2003. Prior to that, Mr. Perkins served in various leadership roles within the energy industry across several different companies, had employment experience with companies operating in both the midstream and upstream sectors, and was a management consultant with McKinsey & Company working primarily in energy. Mr. Perkins’ intimate knowledge of all facets of the Company, derived from his past services as Executive Chairman of the Board and as President and Chief Executive Officer, coupled with his broad experience in the energy industry, and specifically in the midstream sector, his engineering and business educational background, and his experience with the investment community, and experiences on other boards enable Mr. Perkins to provide a valuable and unique perspective to the Board on a range of business and management matters.

James W. Whalen Rene R. Joycehas served as a director of the Company since its formation in October 2005 and of the General Partner since February 2007. Mr. Whalen previously servedas Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company and the General Partner between January 2015 and March 2020. He also served as director of an affiliate of the Company during 2004 and 2005. Mr. Whalen previously served as Advisor to Chairman and CEO of the Company and the General Partner between January 2012 and December 2014. He served as Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company between October 2010 and December 2011 and of the General Partner between December 2010 and December 2011. He also served as President-Finance and Administration of the Company between January 2006 and October 2010 and the General Partner between October 2006 and December 2010 and for various Targa subsidiaries since November 2005. Between October 2002 and October 2005, Mr. Whalen served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Parker Drilling Company. Between January 2002 and October 2002, he was the Chief Financial Officer of Diversified Diagnostic Products, Inc. He served as Chief Commercial Officer of Coral Energy Holding, L.P. (“Coral”) from February 1998 through January 2000. Previously, he served as Chief Financial Officer for Tejas from 1992 to 1998. Mr. Whalen brings a breadth and depth of experience as an executive, Board member, and audit committee member across several different companies and in energy and other industry areas. His valuable management and financial expertise includes an understanding of the accounting and financial matters that the Company and industry address on a regular basis.

Rene R. Joyce has served as a director of the Company since its formation in October 2005 and of the General Partner since October 2006. Mr. Joyce previously served as Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company and the General Partner between January 2012 and December 2014.2014 and as a director of the General Partner between October 2005 and May 2021. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of the

10


Company between October 2005 and December 2011 and the General Partner between October 2006 and December 2011. He also served as an officer and director of an affiliate of the Company during 2004 and 2005 and was a consultant for the affiliate during 2003. Mr. Joyce isserved as a director of Apache Corporation.APA Corporation (NASDAQ: APA) between May 2017 and May 2021. Mr. Joyce served as a consultant in the energy industry from 2000 through 2003 providing advice to various energy companies and investors regarding their operations, acquisitions and dispositions. Mr. Joyce served as President of onshore pipeline operations of Coral Energy, LLC, a subsidiary of Shell from 1998 through 1999 and President of energy services of Coral, a subsidiary of Shell which was the gas and power marketing joint venture between Shell and Tejas, during 1999. Mr. Joyce served as President of various operating subsidiaries of Tejas, a natural gas pipeline company, from 1990 until 1998 when Tejas was acquired by Shell. As the founding Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Joyce brings deep experience in the midstream business, expansive knowledge of the oil and gas industry, as well as relationships with chief executives and other senior management at peer companies, customers and other oil and natural gas companies throughout the world. His experience and industry knowledge, complemented by an engineering and legal educational background, enable Mr. Joyce to provide the Board with executive counsel on the full range of business, technical, and professional matters.

Charles R. Crisp has served as a director of the Company since its formation in October 2005 and2005. He also served as a director of the General Partner sincebetween March 2016. He also served as2016 and May 2021 and a director of an affiliate of the Company during 2004 and 2005. Mr. Crisp was President and Chief Executive Officer of Coral Energy, LLC, a subsidiary of Shell, from 1999 until his retirement in November 2000, and was President and Chief Operating Officer of Coral from January 1998 through February 1999. Prior to this, Mr. Crisp served as President of the power generation group of Houston Industries and, between 1988 and 1996, as President and Chief Operating Officer of Tejas. Mr. Crisp is a director of EOG Resources Inc. (NYSE: EOG). He was also a director of Intercontinental Exchange Inc. (NYSE: ICE) from 2002 until May 2022 and Southern Company Gas (formerly known as AGL Resources Inc.), a subsidiary of The Southern Company EOG Resources Inc. and Intercontinental Exchange Inc.(NYSE: SO), from 2003 until April 2023. Mr. Crisp brings extensive energy experience, a vast understanding of many aspects of our industry and experience serving on the boards of other public companies in the energy industry. His leadership and business experience and deep knowledge of various sectors of the energy industry bring a crucial insight to the Board.

Chris Tong has served as a director of the Company since January 2006 and of the General Partner since March 2016. Mr. Tong served as a director of Kosmos Energy Ltd. from 2011 until September 2019. He served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Noble Energy, Inc. from January 2005 until August 2009. He also served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. from August 1997 until December 2004. Prior thereto, he was Senior Vice President of Finance of Tejas Acadian Holding Company and its subsidiaries, including Tejas Gas Corp., Acadian Gas Corporation and Transok, Inc., all of which were wholly-owned subsidiaries of Tejas. Mr. Tong held these positions from August 1996 until August 1997, and had served in other treasury positions with Tejas since August 1989. Mr. Tong brings a breadth and depth of experience as a chief financial officer in the energy industry, a financial executive, a director of other public companies and a member of other audit committees. He brings significant financial, capital markets and energy industry experience to the Board.

Ershel C. Redd Jr. has served as a director of the Company since February 2011 and2011. Mr. Redd previously served as a director of the General Partner sincebetween March 2016.2016 and May 2021. Mr. Redd has served as a consultant in the energy industry since 2008 providing advice to various energy companies and investors regarding their operations,

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S13


acquisitions and dispositions. Mr. Redd was President and Chief Executive Officer of El Paso Electric Company, a public utility company, from May 2007 until March 2008. Prior to this, Mr. Redd served in various positions with NRG Energy, Inc., a wholesale energy company, including as Executive Vice President—Commercial Operations from October 2002 through July 2006, as President—Western Region from February 2004 through July 2006, and as a director between May 2003 and December 2003. Mr. Redd served as Vice President of Business Development for Xcel Energy Markets, a unit of Xcel Energy Inc., from 2000 through 2002, and as President and Chief Operating Officer for New Century Energy’s (predecessor to Xcel Energy Inc.) subsidiary, Texas Ohio Gas Company, from 1997 through 2000. Mr. Redd brings to the Company extensive energy industry experience, a vast understanding of varied aspects of the energy industry and experience in corporate performance, marketing and trading of natural gas and natural gas liquids,NGLs, risk management, finance, acquisitions and divestitures, business development,

11


regulatory relations and strategic planning. His leadership and business experience and deep knowledge of various sectors of the energy industry bring a crucial insight to the Board.

Laura C. Fulton has served as a director of the Company since February 2013 and2013. Ms. Fulton previously served as a director of the General Partner since March 2016.between February 2013 and May 2021. Ms. Fulton has served as the Senior Vice President Financeand Chief Financial Officer of the American Bureau of Shipping since July 2021 and previously served as the Vice President of Finance from January 2020.2020 until July 2021. Ms. Fulton served as the Chief Financial Officer of Hi-Crush Proppants LLC from April 2012 until December 2019 and Hi-Crush GP LLC, the general partner of Hi-Crush Partners LP, from May 2012 until May 2019 and its successor, Hi-Crush Inc., from May 2019 to December 2019. OnDuring July 12, 2020, Hi-Crush Inc. and each of its direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (including Hi-Crush Proppants LLC) (collectively, “Hi-Crush”) filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code. OnDuring October 9, 2020, Hi-Crush’s Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization was confirmed. From March 2008 to October 2011, Ms. Fulton served as Executive Vice President, Accounting and then Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Services, LLC (“AEI”), an owner and operator of essential energy infrastructure assets in emerging markets. Prior to AEI, Ms. Fulton spent 12 years with Lyondell Chemical Company in various capacities, including as general auditor responsible for internal audit and the Sarbanes-Oxley certification process, and as the assistant controller. Prior to that, she spent 11 years with Deloitte & Touche in public accounting, with a focus on audit and assurance. As a chief financial officer, general auditor and external auditor, Ms. Fulton brings to the company extensive financial, accounting and compliance process experience. Ms. Fulton’s experience as a financial executive in the energy industry, including her positions with a publicly-traded company and master limited partnership, also brings industry and capital markets experience to the Board.

Waters S. Davis, IV has served as director of the Company since July 2015 and2015. Mr. Davis previously served as a director of the General Partner sincebetween March 2016. Mr. Davis has served2016 and May 2021 and as President of National Christian Foundation, Houston sincefrom July 2014.2014 until December 2020. Mr. Davis was Executive Vice President of NuDevco LLC (“NuDevco”) from December 2009 to December 2013. Prior to his employment with NuDevco, he served as President of Reliant Energy Retail Services from June 1999 to January 2002 and as Executive Vice President of Spark Energy from April 2007 to November 2009. He previously served as a senior executive at a number ofseveral private companies and as an advisor to a private equity firm, providing operational and strategic guidance. Mr. Davis also serves as a director of Milacron Holdings Corp. Mr. Davis brings expertise in the retail energy, midstream and services industries, which enhances his contributions to the Board.

Robert B. EvansBeth A. Bowman has served as a director of the Company since March 2016 and of the General Partner since February 2007. Mr. Evans is also a director of New Jersey Resources Corporation and One Gas, Inc. Mr. Evans was a director of Sprague Resources GP LLC until OctoberSeptember 2018. Mr. Evans was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy Americas, a business unit of Duke Energy Corp., from January 2004 until his retirement in March 2006. Mr. Evans served as the transition executive for Energy Services, a business unit of Duke Energy, during 2003. Mr. Evans also served as President of Duke Energy Gas Transmission beginning in 1998 and was named President and Chief Executive Officer in 2002. Prior to his employment at Duke Energy, Mr. Evans served as Vice President of marketing and regulatory affairs for Texas Eastern Transmission and Algonquin Gas Transmission from 1996 to 1998. Mr. Evans’ extensive experience in the gas transmission and energy services sectors enhances the knowledge of the Board in these areas of the oil and gas industry. As a former President and CEO of various operating companies, his breadth of executive experiences is applicable to many of the matters routinely facing the Partnership.

Beth A.Ms. Bowman has previously served as a director of the Company and the General Partner sincebetween September 2018.2018 and May 2021. Ms. Bowman has served as a director of Sprague Resources GP LLC, the general partner of Sprague Resources LP (“Sprague”), sincefrom October 2014 and she currently serves on the Audit Committee of Sprague.until November 2022. Ms. Bowman held management positions at Shell Energy North America (US) L.P. (“Shell Energy”) for 17 years until her retirement in September 2015. While at Shell Energy, she held the roles of Senior Vice President of the West and Mexico and later as the Senior Vice President of Sales and Origination for Shell’s North America business. Prior to joining Shell Energy, Ms. Bowman held management positions at Sempra Energy Trading and Sempra’s San Diego Gas & Electric utility in various areas including trading and marketing, risk management, fuel and power supply, regulatory, finance and engineering. Ms. Bowman also served on the board of the California Power Exchange and the board of the California Foundation of Energy and Environment from 2004 until 2015.

12


Ms. Bowman’s extensive energy industry background, including her experience in origination, commodities markets and risk management enhances the knowledge of the Board in these areas of the oil and gas industry.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S14


Lindsey M. Cooksen has served as a director of the Company andsince June 2020. Ms. Cooksen previously served as a director of the General Partner sincebetween June 1, 2020.2020 and May 2021. Ms. Cooksen has served as the founder and managing director of Cooksen Wealth, LLC, a wealth management firm, since April 2019. She previously held various positions with Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management (“Morgan Stanley”) from August 2009 to April 2019. While at Morgan Stanley she held the roles of Private Wealth Advisor, Family Wealth Director and Portfolio Management Director. She also previously worked for Citigroup Global Investment Bank between July 2005 and August 2007. Ms. Cooksen’s extensive corporate experience in the financial services industry, including wealth management and portfolio construction, tax planning and analysis and risk mitigation brings financial experience and an investor’s perspective to the Board.

R. Keith Teague has served as a director of the Company since February 2024. Mr. Teague served as the Chief Operating Officer of Tellurian, Inc. and its predecessors from October 2016 to July 2022. Prior to joining Tellurian Investments LLC, Mr. Teague served in various leadership roles at Cheniere Energy Inc. (“Cheniere”), including Executive Vice President, Asset Group from February 2014 to September 2016, Senior Vice President – Asset Group from April 2008 to February 2014, Vice President – Pipeline Operations from May 2006 to April 2008, and Director of Facility Planning from February 2004 to May 2006. From December 2001 to September 2003, Mr. Teague served as the Director of Strategic Planning for the CMS Panhandle Companies. He began his career with Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, where he managed pipeline operations and facility expansion projects. Mr. Teague previously served as a director on the Board of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: CQP), a publicly traded subsidiary partnership of Cheniere, from April 2008 to October 2016 and previously served on the Board of Directors for the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA), and the Board and Executive Committee of the INGAA Foundation. Mr. Teague’s engineering and business educational background, his experience on a publicly traded partnership Board, and his extensive project execution experience provide the Board with valued perspective related to energy infrastructure development and operations.

Caron A. Lawhorn has served as a director of the Company since March 2024. Ms. Lawhorn served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ONE Gas, Inc. (NYSE: OGS) from March 2019 until her retirement in December 2023. Prior to that role, Ms. Lawhorn served at OGS as Senior Vice President, Commercial, responsible for the commercial activities of OGS’ three natural gas distribution utilities, as well as overseeing the company’s information technology and cybersecurity function, from OGS’ separation from ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) into a standalone, publicly traded company in January 2014. Ms. Lawhorn served in the same role at OKE prior to the separation. Before that, she served as President of OKE’s natural gas distribution segment. From July 2009 until March 2011, she served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Planning and Development of OKE and ONEOK Partners, responsible for business development, strategic and long-range planning, and capital investment. Ms. Lawhorn became Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer for OKE in 2007, adding responsibility for ONEOK Partners in 2008. Prior to that, she served as Senior Vice President of Financial Services and Treasurer of OKE. Ms. Lawhorn joined OKE in 1998, after serving as a Senior Manager at KPMG and Chief Financial Officer of Emergency Medical Services Authority in Tulsa. She also serves a director of AAON, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAON), where she has chaired the audit committee since 2019. Ms. Lawhorn’s extensive background in various accounting, finance, operational and executive positions, including her experience as a financial executive of a publicly traded energy company, provides the Board with significant accounting and financial expertise. Additionally, Ms. Lawhorn’s previous experience in overseeing information technology and cybersecurity matters also provides the Board with valuable cybersecurity experience.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S15


Summary of Director Qualifications and Experience

This table provides a summary view of the qualifications and attributes of each director and director nominee.

 

 
 Directors 
  Directors  
  

 

LOGO

  

 

LOGO

  

 

LOGO

  

 

LOGO

  

 

LOGO

  

 

LOGO

  

 

LOGO

  

 

LOGO

  

 

LOGO

  

 

LOGO

  

 

LOGO

  

 

LOGO

  

 

LOGO

  LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO 
 

Knowledge, Skills, Experience

                                       

Knowledge, Skills, Experience

 

  
  

Accounting

                                                          
  

Business Operations

                                                            
  

Capital Management

                                                              
  

Corporate Governance Leadership

                                                             
  

Cybersecurity

                              
  

Executive Experience

                                                             
  

Financial Expertise

                                                             
  

HR / Compensation

                                                            
  

Independence

                                                             
  

Industry Experience

                                                             
  

Legal / Regulatory

                                                              
  

Mergers & Acquisitions

                                                             
  

Public Company Board Experience

                                                           
  

Risk Management

                                                              
  

Strategic Planning / Oversight

                                                              
  
                         

Demographic Background

                                       

Demographic Background

 

Targa Board Tenure (Years)1

  2  0  1  10  5  4  7  10  1  8  9  10  10
  

Targa Board

Tenure (Years) (1)

  5   3   4   13   8   11   13   0   4   12   13   0 
  

Gender (Male / Female)

  F  M  F  M  M  M  F  M  M  M  M  M  M  F   M   F   M   M   F   M   F   M   M   M   M 
  
                         

Race / Ethnicity

                                       

Race / Ethnicity

 

  

Asian / Pacific Islander

                                                    
  

Black

                                                    
  

Caucasian / White

                                                            
  

Hispanic / Latino

                                                   
  

Native American

                                                                

(1)

(1)

As of the date of the Annual Meeting. Tenure calculated from the closing date of the Targa initial public offering.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S16


Board Composition and Governance Highlights

 

92% Board Independence42% Board Diversity

LOGO

LOGO

Average Tenure = 7.5 Years(1)Average Age = 63.4

LOGO

LOGO

13

(1)

As of the date of the Annual Meeting. Tenure calculated from the closing date of the Targa initial public offering.

96%

Support on Say on Pay in 2023

100%

Independent Audit, Compensation, and
Nominating and Governance Committees

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S17


MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS

Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors currently consists of thirteentwelve members. The Board of Directors reviewed the independence of our directors using the independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and various other factors discussed under “Director Independence” and, based on this review, determined that Mses. Bowman, Cooksen, and Fulton and Lawhorn and Messrs. Chung, Crisp, Davis, Evans, Joyce, Perkins, Redd and TongTeague are independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards currently in effect. On February 26, 2024, Mr. Evans resigned from the Board. Mr. Redd will not be standing for reelection and is retiring from the Board, effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting. The Board held eleveneight meetings during 2020.2023. In addition, the independent members of the Board of Directors meet in executive session without the presence of the CEO or other members of management at least once annually. During 2020,2023, each of the directors that served on the Board of Directors during the year attended at least 75%100% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of meetings of all committees of the Board on which that director served.

Our directors are divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms. Class I, Class II and Class III directors will serve until our annual meetings of stockholders in 2023, 20212026, 2024 and 2022,2025, respectively. The Class I directors are Messrs. Chung, Crisp and WhalenTeague and Ms. Fulton, the Class II directors are Messrs. Evans, Redd (who is retiring from the Board and will not be standing for reelection) and Perkins and Mses. Bowman and Cooksen and the Class III directors are Messrs. Davis, Joyce and Meloy and Tong.Ms. Lawhorn. At each annual meeting of stockholders, directors will be elected to succeed the class of directors whose terms have expired. This classification of our Board of Directors could have the effect of increasing the length of time necessary to change the composition of a majority of the Board of Directors. In general, at least two annual meetings of stockholders will be necessary for stockholders to effect a change in a majority of the members of the Board of Directors.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee, Risk Management Committee and Sustainability Committee, and may have such other committees as the Board of Directors shall determine from time to time. Each of the standing committees of the Board of Directors has the composition and responsibilities described below.

Audit Committee

The members of our Audit Committee are Mses. Cooksen and Fulton, Lawhorn and Mr. Evans.Teague. Ms. Fulton is the Chairman of this committee. Our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that Mses. Cooksen and Fulton and Mr. Evans areeach of the members of the Audit Committee is independent as described in the rules of the NYSE and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Our Board of Directors has also determined that, based upon relevant experience, Ms. Fulton is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K.

This committee oversees, reviews, acts on and reports on various auditing and accounting matters to our Board of Directors, including: the selection of our independent auditors, the scope of our annual audits, fees to be paid to the independent auditors, the performance of our independent auditors and our accounting practices. In addition, theThe Audit Committee oversees our compliance programs relating to legal and regulatory requirements and our cybersecurity efforts and measures. Committee:

Oversees, reviews, acts on and reports on various auditing and accounting matters to our Board of Directors, including: the selection of our independent auditors, the scope of our annual audits, fees to be paid to the independent auditors, the performance of our independent auditors and our accounting practices;

Oversees our compliance programs relating to legal and regulatory requirements;

Reviews and acts on, as necessary, related party transactions, pursuant to our policies and procedures and applicable accounting standards; and

Reviews our risk management program regarding enterprise-wide risks (including those associated with ESG policies, trends, and issues) and mitigants and reviews risks and initiatives relating to data privacy, cybersecurity and information technology.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S18


We have adopted an Audit Committee charter defining the committee’s primary duties in a manner consistent with the rules of the SEC and NYSE that is posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance. The Audit Committee held four meetings during 2020.2023.

Compensation Committee

The members of our Compensation Committee are Messrs. Crisp, DavisMr. Teague and EvansMses. Cooksen and Bowman. Ms. Bowman. Mr. DavisBowman is the Chairman of this committee. This committee establishes salaries, incentives and other forms of compensation for officers, directors and other employees. This includes establishing our ESG-linked compensation program, which aims to align executive compensation with sustainability goals and targets, and assessing our ESG performance. Our Compensation Committee also administers our incentive compensation and benefit plans.plans, and oversees our clawback policy. We have adopted a Compensation Committee charter defining the committee’s

14


primary duties in a manner consistent with the rules of the SEC and NYSE that is posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance. The Compensation Committee held fourfive meetings during 2020.2023. Our Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Compensation Committee is (i) independent under the NYSE’s rules governing Compensation Committee membership; and (ii) a “non-employee director” under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act.

The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain, compensate, direct, oversee and terminate outside counsel, compensation consultants and other advisors hired to assist the Compensation Committee. In April 2020,May 2023, the Compensation Committee retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (the “Compensation Consultant” or “Meridian”) as its independent compensation consultant for matters related to executive and non-management director compensation. The Compensation Consultant reports to the Compensation Committee and does not provide any additional services to us.

In April 2020,May 2023, the Compensation Committee considered the independence of Meridian in light of SEC rules and the NYSE listing standards. The Compensation Committee requested and received a letter from Meridian addressing the consulting firm’s independence, including the following factors:

 

Other services provided to us by Meridian;

Other services provided to us by Meridian;

 

Fees paid by us as a percentage of Meridian’s total revenue;

Fees paid by us as a percentage of Meridian’s total revenue;

 

Policies or procedures maintained by Meridian that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest;

Policies or procedures maintained by Meridian that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest;

 

Any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and members of the Compensation Committee;

Any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and members of the Compensation Committee;

 

Any stock of the Company owned by the individual consultants involved in the engagement; and

Any stock of the Company owned by the individual consultants involved in the engagement; and

 

Any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and Meridian or the individual consultants involved in the engagement.

Any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and Meridian or the individual consultants involved in the engagement.

The Compensation Committee discussed these considerations and concluded that the work of Meridian did not raise any conflict of interest.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The members of our Nominating and Governance Committee are Messrs. Crisp and Davis and Tong and Ms.��Fulton. Mr. CrispDavis is the Chairman of this committee. This committee identifies, evaluates and recommends qualified nominees to serve on our Board of Directors, develops and oversees our internal corporate governance processes and maintains a management succession plan. We have adopted a Nominating and Governance Committee charter defining the committee’s primary duties in a manner consistent with the rules of the SEC and NYSE that is posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance. The Nominating and Governance Committee held threefour meetings during 2020.2023. Our Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent under the NYSE’s rules governing board membership.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S19


In evaluating director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee assesses whether a candidate possesses the integrity, judgment, knowledge, experience, skills and expertise that are likely to enhance the Board’s ability to manage and direct the affairs and business of the Company, including, when applicable, to enhance the ability of committees of the Board to fulfill their duties.

Risk Management Committee

The members of our Risk Management Committee are Messrs. Joyce, TongPerkins and Whalen and Ms. Bowman. Ms. BowmanDavis. Mr. Perkins is the Chairman of this committee. This committee oversees our commodity price and commodity basis risk management and hedging activity.

15


The primary purpose of our commodity risk management activities is to hedge our exposure to price risk and to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in commodity prices on cash flow.

We have adopted a Risk Management Committee charter defining the committee’s primary duties that is posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance.

Sustainability Committee

The members of our Sustainability Committee are Ms. Cooksen and Messrs. Chung, Joyce and Crisp and Ms. Cooksen.Joyce. Mr. Chung is the Chairman of this committee. This committee oversees the Company’s materialenvironmental, social, and sustainability matters, including governance in relation to such matters.

The primary purpose of our Sustainability Committee is to assist the Board in overseeing our compliance with all laws, regulations and Company policies and procedures related to material ESGenvironmental, social and sustainability matters, including governance in relationour stakeholder engagement program as it relates to such matters,sustainability and to overseethe establishment and retention of a sustainable and diverse workforce. Our Sustainability Committee also oversees management’s process for establishing and implementing a strategy to integrate sustainability into various business activities of the Company to create long-term stockholder value.stakeholder benefits.

We have adopted a Sustainability Committee charter defining the committee’s primary duties that is posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S20

16


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board of Directors believes that sound governance practices and policies provide an important framework to assist it in fulfilling its duty to stockholders. The Company’s “Corporate Governance Guidelines” cover the following principal subjects:

Role and functions of the Board of Directors

Qualifications and independence of directors

Size of the Board of Directors and director selection process

Our policy on the number of public company boards a director may serve on

Role of Lead Independent Director

Committee functions

Meetings of non-employee directors

Self-evaluation

Ethics and conflicts of interest (a copy of the current “Code of Conduct” is posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance)

Compensation of the Board of Directors

Succession planning

Access to senior management and to independent advisors

New director orientation

Continuing education

The Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance. The Corporate Governance Guidelines will be reviewed periodically, and any proposed additions to or amendments of the Corporate Governance Guidelines will be presented to the Board of Directors for its approval.

The NYSE has adopted rules that require listed companies to adopt governance guidelines covering certain matters. The Company believes that the Corporate Governance Guidelines comply with the NYSE rules.

Board Leadership

Mr. Chung has served as Chairman of the Board of the Company’s Board of Directors since January 1, 2021 and served as Executive Vice President and Senior Legal Advisor of the Company between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020. Mr. Meloy has served as Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company since March 1, 2020. Although the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors are held currently by different individuals, our bylaws allow the same individual to hold the position of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors.

To further ensure a strong and independent board, the Board appointed Ms. Fulton as Lead Independent Director, and all directors of the Company, other than Mr. Meloy, are independent. Given the strong leadership of the Company’s CEO, the effective counterbalancing role of the Chairman, the strong Lead Independent Director, and a Board comprised of strong and independent directors, the Board believes that, at the present time, the current structure of the Board best serves the interests of the Company and its stockholders.

In his capacity as chair of the meetings of non-management directors, Mr. Chung provides, in conjunction with the CEO, leadership and guidance to the Board of Directors. He also (i) establishes the agenda for each meeting of the non-management directors and (ii) provides the Board’s guidance and feedback to the CEO and the Company’s management team. All directors are encouraged to suggest the inclusion of agenda items or revisions to meeting materials, and any director is free to raise at any Board meeting items that are not on the agenda for that meeting.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S21


In her capacity as the Lead Independent Director, Ms. Fulton (i) presides at executive sessions of the independent directors and has the authority to call additional executive sessions or meetings of the independent directors and (ii) presides at Board meetings of the non-management directors in the Chairman’s absence. The Lead Independent Director is available for consultation and direct communication with major stockholders, if requested.

The non-management members of the Board of Directors regularly meet in executive session without the presence of the CEO or other members of management. In addition, the independent members of the Board of Directors meet in executive session without the presence of the CEO or other members of management at least once annually. Mr. Chung is chair of meetings of the non-management directors and Ms. Fulton chairs the meetings of the independent directors.

Board Composition

It is the responsibility of the Nominating and Governance Committee to identify, evaluate and recommend to the Board of Directors nominees for election at the annual meeting of stockholders, as well as to fill vacancies or additions on the Board of Directors that may occur between annual meetings. Although the Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity or apply a strict “Rooney Rule” approach, the Committee considers a diverse pool of candidates for new member election to the Board of Directors, considering each candidate’s individual business and professional experience, demonstrated leadership ability, diversity, and acumen (financial, industry, technology, investor, ESG, and other specialized skills). We view and define diversity in a broad sense, which includes gender, ethnicity, age, education, industry/profession, experience, and leadership qualities. In assessing the composition of the Board of Directors, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee strive to achieve an overall balance of diversity of backgrounds and experience with a complementary mix of skills, viewpoints, and professional experience in areas relevant to the Company’s business and strategy.

When recommending director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee also considers and reviews each candidate’s business judgment, service on boards of directors of other companies and other time commitments, personal and professional integrity, including commitment to the Company’s core values, openness and ability to work as part of a team and willingness to commit the required time to serve as a board member and familiarity with the Company and its industry. In 2023, the Board implemented a policy on the number of public company boards a director may serve on. The policy, which can be found in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, states that Directors should not serve on more than three other boards of public companies in addition to the Company’s Board. The Chief Executive Officer should not serve on the boards of more than two other public companies in addition to the Company’s Board. Any exception requires a determination by the Board or the Nominating and Governance Committee that such service does not impair the director’s ability to effectively serve as a member of the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee has determined that, in its view, no director on the Board currently has time commitments that would prevent such director from properly discharging his or her duties as a director.

As part of our commitment to refresh our Broad and retain experienced individuals, we are pleased to have added two new qualified members to our Board, Mr. R. Keith Teague and Ms. Caron A. Lawhorn, in early 2024. We are proud of our efforts to maintain a board with diversity of experiences, perspectives and backgrounds. This commitment has seen the gender diversity on our Board rise from 10% to 33% over the past six years. We will continue to ensure that the benefits of increasing diversity are a central part of the Nominating and Governance Committee’s deliberations on potential appointments and included in the Board’s process for succession planning, including within our Board refreshment plans and part of our annual evaluation of Board effectiveness and composition.

When identifying potential director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee relies on any source available for the identification and recommendation of candidates, including current directors and officers and stockholders. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee from time to time may engage a third party search firm to identify or evaluate, or assist in identifying or evaluating potential candidates, for which the third party search firm will be paid a fee.

Communications with the Board of Directors

Stockholders or other interested parties can contact any director (including the Chairman of the Board, Mr. Chung, or the Lead Independent Director, Ms. Fulton), any committee of the Board of Directors, or our non-management

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S22


directors as a group, by writing to them at Targa Resources Corp., 811 Louisiana Street, Suite 2100, Houston, Texas 77002, Attention: Secretary. Comments or complaints relating to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will also be referred to members of the Audit Committee. The Secretary will review these communications and will forward any communications that they determine bears substantively on the business, management, or governance of the Company.

Director Independence

The Company’s standards for determining director independence require the assessment of directors’ independence each year. A director cannot be considered independent unless the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that he or she does not have any relationship with management or the Company that may interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment, including any of the relationships that would disqualify the director from being independent under the rules of the NYSE.

The Board of Directors has assessed the independence of each director and each nominee for director under the Company’s guidelines and the independence standards of the NYSE. The Board of Directors affirmatively determined that Mses. Bowman, Cooksen, Fulton and Lawhorn and Messrs. Chung, Crisp, Davis, Evans, Joyce, Perkins, Teague and Redd are independent. On February 26, 2024, Mr. Evans resigned from the Board. Mr. Redd will not be standing for reelection and is retiring from the Board, effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting.

Financial Literacy of Audit Committee and Designation of Financial Experts

The Board of Directors has determined that each of the Audit Committee members is financially literate and that the Chairman of the Audit Committee, Ms. Fulton, is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC.

Oversight of Risk Management

Except for the responsibilities of the Audit Committee discussed below, the Board of Directors as a whole (including the committees of the Board of Directors) oversees the assessment of major risks that the Company faces in the short-, intermediate- and long-term timeframe, and the management of such risks. For example, at least annually, the Board of Directors, including the committees of the Board of Directors:

reviews and approves the Company’s annual business plan and capital budget and reviews with management on at least a quarterly basis the Company’s financial performance, including any variations from the annual business plan and capital budget;

oversees the Company’s enterprise risk management process;

has established specific dollar limits on the commitment authority of members of senior management and requires Board approval of the Company’s capital expenditures and investments exceeding that authority; and

monitors the Company’s hedging activities.

The Company’s Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s assessment and management of financial reporting and internal control risks, as well as other risks such as the credit risks associated with counterparty exposure. The Audit Committee also oversees the Company’s data privacy, cybersecurity and information technology risks, as well as related key initiatives and action plans. Management and the Company’s external auditors report regularly to the Audit Committee on those subjects. The Company’s Sustainability Committee assists the Board of Directors in overseeing our ESG-related risks and environmental and safety performance. Given the strong leadership of the Company’s CEO, the effective counterbalancing role of the Chairman and a Board comprised of strong and independent directors, the Board believes that, at the present time, the current structure of the Board best serves the interests of the Company and its stockholders in overseeing and managing the Company’s major risks.

Attendance at Annual Meetings

While there is no formal attendance policy, the Board of Directors encourages all directors to attend the annual meetings of stockholders, if practicable. We anticipate that the majority of our directors will attend the Annual Meeting. All directors serving at the time attended the annual meeting of stockholders in 2023.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S23


Shareholder Engagement

We communicate with our shareholders through various platforms, including SEC filings, quarterly earnings calls and press releases, investor conferences, our sustainability report, and regular shareholder engagement meetings and calls. We regularly engage with our shareholders throughout the year to discuss our business strategy and performance, corporate governance, sustainability, executive compensation, and other topics. These engagements provide an important platform for Targa’s management team and Board of Directors to communicate business, sustainability, and other updates to shareholders and to receive feedback on key topics. Below is a graphical representation of our annual engagement practices with shareholders:

LOGO

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S24


Our engagements with shareholders cover a variety of topics, including business strategy and performance, corporate governance, executive compensation, and ESG and sustainability-related matters, among other topics. These discussions typically include some combination of our CFO, General Counsel, SVP – Sustainability, SVP – Finance and Treasurer, VP – Finance and Investor Relations, and Board members. We receive important feedback from shareholders through these conversations that we report to our full Board of Directors. During our recent engagements with shareholders, Targa gained valuable feedback on key topics, including:

 Overall Business

   Shareholders provided positive feedback around the Company’s overall business strategy and execution.

   Shareholders positively highlighted our strong operational and financial performance, coupled with our strong balance sheet, which positions us to return increasing capital to our shareholders through a higher common dividend and share repurchases.

 Executive Compensation

   Shareholders expressed continued appreciation for our executive compensation practices and our commitment to engage with our shareholders on executive compensation.

   Shareholders appreciated that the majority of our compensation is in the form of at-risk variable pay with payouts tied to our performance through several strategic and financial objectives.

 ESG

   Shareholders positively received our expanded methane management plan disclosures and additional disclosure on our midstream flaring practices.

   Shareholders appreciated the publication of an updated version of our Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) index on our website demonstrating the progress we have made on alignment of our disclosures with the recommendations of the TCFD.

   Shareholders also provided constructive feedback around our efforts towards advancing and enhancing our sustainability disclosures across each of the ESG pillars, including:

–  Our goals to reduce our methane intensity to 0.08% for our gathering and boosting segment and to 0.11% for our processing segment by 2025, which we remain on track to achieve;

–  Our continued focus on flaring reduction and our continued efforts with ONE Future and API on methane emissions, including working with engine manufacturers on methane slip; and

–  Our tying 10% of cash awards under our annual incentive compensation program to sustainability performance metrics.

Fall 2023 Shareholder Engagement Efforts

2023 Annual Meeting Results: Prior to our shareholder outreach efforts, the Board and management team make it a priority to analyze the results of the annual meeting to gauge shareholder sentiment and identify topics to discuss with shareholders and solicit feedback on. When analyzing the results of the annual meeting, we noted that the shareholder proposal titled “Limit Supply Chain Flaring” saw 41.1% support. Although the proposal did not pass, the Board prioritizes being responsive to shareholders’ views and made a concerted effort to better understand their views on the proposal and related topics.

Engagement Efforts: As part of our commitment to ongoing shareholder engagement, we reached out in fall of 2023 to our top 30 shareholders, which represented approximately 64% of shares outstanding. In the fall of 2023 and into 2024, we engaged directly with shareholders representing approximately 56% of shares outstanding. We also reached out to two proxy advisors and engaged with both of them, and engaged with other investors outside of our top 30 investors. Two of our Directors, Waters S. Davis, IV and Lindsey M. Cooksen, also participated in a

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S25


number of the meetings. Targa’s management team and Board members discussed a variety of topics with shareholders, including those related to the shareholder proposal. Specifically, topics discussed included our methane management plan along with our coordination efforts with upstream operators and customers to reduce flaring.

Fall 2023 Shareholder Outreach Efforts

We contacted shareholders

representing over

We met with shareholders

representing approximately

LOGO

LOGO

What We Heard:

After thorough engagement and discussing the views of many shareholders on the shareholder proposal specifically, the primary feedback we heard on the proposal and related topics included:

Shareholders asked for additional disclosure around how we curtail upstream venting and flaring;

Shareholders requested that we provide additional disclosure around our procedures to provide as much advance notice as practicable to upstream operators about potential outages or planned maintenance activities;

Shareholders inquired about our coordination efforts with upstream operators on projected timing and volumes from new wells to secure takeaway capacity for when production begins;

Shareholders expressed concerns with potentially setting reduction targets for our upstream partners and the potential negative financial impact that could have on our business; and

Shareholders noted that the appropriate location for these disclosures was in our annual sustainability report.

How We Responded: Following our extensive engagement process, it was very important to the Board and management team to demonstrate responsiveness to our shareholders’ views. Targa provided enhanced disclosure in our most recent sustainability report as a direct response to shareholder feedback. This enhanced disclosure included expanded disclosure on our methane management plan, which centers around the utilization of various detection technologies. We also disclosed additional details around our ongoing efforts to reduce flaring from unplanned and unexpected downtime. In addition, we provided more transparency into our communication practices with upstream customers.

We view the disclosures within our report as responsive to our shareholders’ feedback at this time, and remain committed to further regular engagement with shareholders to understand their views across a variety of topics. For additional information, we invite you to visit our most recent sustainability report which is available on the Company’s website at https://www.targaresources.com/sustainability. However, please note that the content of that report, and other materials on our website, are not incorporated into this proxy statement by reference. Additionally, we may provide information in this proxy statement that is not necessarily “material” under the federal securities laws for SEC reporting purposes, but that is informed by various ESG standards and frameworks (including standards for the measurement of underlying data), and the interests of various stakeholders, which may be impacted by matters outside of our control. This proxy statement also contains forward-looking statements, which may be impacted by many risks, including those identified on our most recently filed Form 10-K.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S26


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) reviews the elements and objectives of Targa’s executive compensation program and the decision-making process by our Compensation Committee in support of those objectives. We encourage you to read this CD&A in combination with the compensation tables that follow for context regarding the Compensation Committee’s 20202023 decisions on compensation for our Named Executive Officers (NEOs), as listed below.

 

2020 2023 Named

Executive Officers

 

Joe Bob Perkins

  

 

Matthew J. Meloy

 

Executive Chairman

 

Matthew J. Meloy

Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

 

Jennifer R. Kneale

 

Chief Financial Officer (CFO)

 

Patrick J. McDonie

 

President – Gathering and Processing

 

D. Scott Pryor

 

President – Logistics and Transportation

 

Robert M. Muraro

Chief Commercial Officer

 

  

 

Chief Commercial Officer

 

Executive Summary

Growing EBITDA, Growing Dividend, Reducing Share Count, Strong Balance Sheet

LOGO

As part of our leadership transition plan, Matthew J. Meloy became our CEO effective March 1, 2020 at which time Joe Bob Perkins, our former CEO, became Executive Chairman of our Board of Directors.

Effective January 1, 2021, Paul W. Chung, Executive Vice President and Senior Legal Advisor, retired from the management team and was elected as Chairmanone of the Board of Directors. Atlargest independent midstream infrastructure companies in North America, we are focused on delivering natural gas and NGLs from wellhead to domestic and global markets, helping to meet the same time, Joe Bob Perkins retired from his position as Executive Chairman and from the management team. Mr. Perkins continues to serve on the Board of Directors.

Some of the changes discussed in this CD&A regarding compensation opportunities for 2020 reflect this leadership transition and continued work by the Committee to ensure that compensation opportunities reflect market median practice for each of our NEOs.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2020 Business Environment

During 2020, global commodity prices declined due to factors that significantly impacted both supply and demand. As the COVID-19 pandemic spread and travel and other restrictions were implemented globally, theworld’s growing demand for commodities declined substantially. Additionally, certain major oil producing nations significantly increased their oilmore reliable and gas production late in the first quarter which further contributed to the surplus productionmore affordable fuels and feedstocks that help support higher global standards of commodities. Despite these nations subsequently agreeing to reduce global commodity supplies and global economies beginning to re-open, commodity prices remained weak relative to historical levels and continued to be volatile. Reduced economic activity due to the COVID-19 pandemic, combined with uncertainty around global commodity supply and demand, contributed to lower commodity prices. Furthermore, the decline in commodity prices led many exploration and production companies to reduce planned capital expenditures for drilling and production activities and also led to some companies shutting in wells primarily in the first half of 2020. While commodity prices remain low relative to historical levels and uncertainties associated with the impacts of COVID-19 continue, production from wells that were previously shut-in during the first half of 2020 across our operating areas has largely resumed and energy demand and commodity prices continued to recover compared to the first half of 2020.

In the first quarter of 2020, in a response to market conditions, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a reduction in the Company’s quarterly common dividend to $0.10 per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 from $0.91 per share in the previous quarter. This reduction provided

17


for approximately $755 million of additional annual direct cash flow, resulting in significant free cash flow available to reduce debt. Additionally, we meaningfully reduced capital spending. We continue to work through numerous internal initiatives to respond to current market conditions, including identifying and implementing cost reduction measures such as reducing or deferring non-essential operating and general and administrative expenses.

As a critical energy infrastructure operator, Targa prioritizes safety in all parts of our organization. In response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we moved early and quickly to protect the health and safety of our employees and are continuing to proactively manage our response to an evolving national and global situation. We activated and continue to operate under our Business Continuity Plan and took several additional strategic, proactive measures in response to information from the Centers for Disease Control and the local, state and national authorities to try to minimize the risk of business disruption and to protect our ability to deliver reliable services to our customers. Our Business Continuity Plan included:

Forming a critical response team of senior management in January 2020 to collaborate, review, and execute Targa’s business response to COVID-19

Proactively conducting a mandatory work-from-home drill for all non-field employees ahead of the stay-at-home orders issued by applicable governmental authorities

Preserving our workforce by providing our non-field employees with technology and equipment to perform their work duties remotely

Instituting social distancing practices and routine deep cleaning protocols at all facility locations to manage the spread of the virus

Equipping our facilities’ employees with personal face coverings

Continuing to provide leading customer service and reliable operations through enhanced facilities protocols, including limiting access to facilities by essential personnel, enabling social distancing, conducting jobsite safety meetings under social distancing protocols and encouraging virtual meetings rather than in-person meetings when possible

Engaging with our supply chain to review their capabilities and continuity of operations and service

Implementing plans for safely returning to offices over time

Our Board of Directors receives regular updates around preserving the well-being of our employees and continuity of Targa business operations as COVID-19 evolves.

Despite the challenges experienced during 2020, we remain focused in operating our infrastructure assets safely and protecting the health and safety of our employees.

2020 Performance Highlights

Our overall business performed well in 2020, led by our leadership position in the Permian Basin and our integrated NGL platform. Our full year average Permian natural gas inlet volumes increased 19% when compared to 2019, and drove increasing volumes through our Logistics and Transportation systems, demonstrating the strength of our integrated system. Grand Prix Pipeline throughput, and our fractionation and LPG export volumes all increased significantly over 2019.

Our full year net income (loss) for 2020 was ($1.5) billion compared to ($209.2) million for 2019. Our full year 2020 Adjusted EBITDA of $1.64 billion increased 14% over 2019 and we generated $575 million of free cash flow in the year. In 2020, increasing Adjusted EBITDA and reduced growth capital spending resulted in improving leverage metrics, and we exited 2020 with meaningfully lower leverage when compared to 2019. See Appendix A for a discussion of Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow, and reconciliations of such measures to their most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

18


In 2020, we completed several major projects on time and on budget, including two processing plants in the Permian Basin, two fractionation trains in Mont Belvieu, the phased expansion of our LPG export capabilities (“LEP 3”), and the extension of our Grand Prix Pipeline into central Oklahoma. These expansions position Targa to benefit from increasing operating leverage moving forward.

living. We believe that our key strategic effortsexcellent operational performance, industry leading EBITDA growth outlook, identification of attractive investment opportunities, strong balance sheet and increasing return of capital to shareholders differentiate our company and mean we are well positioned now and for the future. 

(1)

Based on estimated 2024 adjusted operating margin.

(2)

Management expects to recommend to the Company’s Board of Directors an increase to the 2024 quarterly cash common dividend to $3.00 per share annualized.

2023 Business Environment

Targa’s excellent performance drove record financial and operational metrics across a challenging business environment in 2023, highlighting the strength and resiliency of Targa’s strategy and business model. Commodity prices were lower in 2023 and volatility continued in global markets. Global events continued to underscore the critical nature of safe, reliable and affordable fossil fuels to support everyday life domestically and around re-contracting to add fees inthe world. Volume growth across Targa’s assets, highlighted by record Permian Gathering and Processing reducing growth capital spending, identifying opportunitiesvolumes driving record volumes through our NGL transportation, fractionation and export assets, continues to reduce operating and general and administrative expenses, reducing our dividend, and focusing on integrated opportunities position us forsupport the thesis that the Permian is a successful 2021 and beyond.

Shareholder Outreachglobally cost-advantaged supply basin.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S27


With decades of producer drilling expected within our areas of operation and the necessity of additional infrastructure to support our customers, we continued to invest in attractive organic growth projects, bringing major projects online on-time and on-budget, despite a business environment challenged by supply chain constraints and the continued impacts of inflation.

2023 Performance Highlights

LOGO

(1)

Reported Permian natural gas inlet volumes.

(2)

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Please see the section of this proxy statement entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a discussion of adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of such measure to its most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

Track Record of Growth

Increasing volume trajectory through Targa’s difficult to replicate integrated NGL infrastructure footprint

LOGO

(1)

Operational metrics represent average annual volumes.

(2)

Targa’s Grand Prix NGL Pipeline commenced full operations during third quarter of 2019.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S28


Track Record of Growth Driving an Increasing Return of Capital to Shareholders

Integrated NGL business and strong business fundamentals drive increasing cash flow outlook and return of capital

LOGO

(1)

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Please see the section of this proxy statement entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a discussion of adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of such measure to its most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. Adjusted EBITDA growth based on midpoint of projected estimated 2024 Adjusted EBITDA range compared to 2019 Adjusted EBITDA.

(2)

Management expects to recommend to the Company’s Board of Directors an increase to the 2024 quarterly cash common dividend to $3.00 per share annualized.

Strong Investment Grade Balance Sheet Supported by Increasing G&P Fee Margin

Targa’s Gathering and Processing business has undergone a significant transformation in adding fees and fee floors to contracts

~90%

Fee-Based Volumes in

G&P Exiting 2023

  In 2023, we continued to add fees and fee floors to contracts in our Gathering and Processing business to reduce exposure to downside commodity prices.

  Exiting 2023, ~90% of our G&P volumes are fee-based or have fee floors.

  Adding fees and fee floors to G&P contracts has been a large multi-year strategic initiative across our organization and we are proud of our organization’s execution.

Other 2023 Performance Highlights

Strong safety performance.

Major projects came online on-time, on-budget and highly utilized at start-up (Legacy II plant, Midway plant, Galena Park export expansion, Greenwood plant, and Wildcat II plant).

Current major projects in process progressing well (three G&P processing plants, two Targa fractionators, GCF fractionator re-start and Daytona NGL pipeline).

Successfully executed the full integration of our Q2 and Q3 2022 acquisitions in South Texas and Permian Delaware.

Sustainability ratings upgrade by MSCI from BB to AA.

Ended 2023 on positive outlook from Fitch, S&P and Moody’s, positioning Targa for its February 2024 upgrade to BBB by S&P.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S29


Higher year-over-year return of capital to our shareholders through both an increased common dividend and record common share repurchases.

Shareholder Outreach

We regularly meet with our shareholders to discuss business topics, seek feedback on our performance, and address other matters such as executive compensation.compensation and ESG matters.

2019
Outreach
2020
Outreach

  

During 2019 and 2020 we increased the focus and intensity of our stockholder engagement on executive compensation matters in response to say-on-pay vote support of approximately 60% in 2019 and approximately 66% in 2020.

50

invited
stockholders     

50

invited
stockholders

These discussions typically include some combination of our lead independent director, our CEO, CFO, General Counsel, SVP – Sustainability and VP Finance and Investor Relations. In 2020, we also included our SVP of Sustainability and Environmental, Safety and Health (ES&H).

 

 

Our say-on-pay vote has been strong over the past three years, with support in excess of 95% in 2021, 2022 and 2023.

 80%

of
outstanding
shares

71%

of
outstanding
shares

With a desire to broaden our perspective and improve our communications related to executive compensation, governance, ESG, sustainability and related matters, we willexpect to continue to engage in annual outreach on those topics withtargeting our largesttop shareholders.

24

meetings
conducted

24

meetings
conducted

 

What We Heard During 2019 and 2020

2022 Outreach

2023 Outreach

•   Annual incentives appear to be discretionary and plan mechanics are difficult to understand

•   Including multiple annual performance periods in our performance share unit (PSU) plan was viewed by some observers as partially short-termTop 25 shareholders contacted

•   The Company should have a robust market-based clawback policy

•   The use Top 30 shareholders contacted

Top 25 represented 63%of multiple benchmarking peer groups seems overly complicatedoutstanding shares

•   Single-trigger vesting

Top 30 represented 64%of equity upon a change in control (CIC) is no longer typical market practiceoutstanding shares

•   Consider including per share cash flow metrics or return metrics under the annual plan, such as free cash flow, cash flow from operations, distributable cash flow and return

16meetings conducted

24meetings conducted

Say on invested capitalPay Support:

•   Consider using a broader market index in place of or in combination with the AMUS index in our PSU program97%

•   Consider prohibiting pledging of Company stock in addition to not allowing hedging or purchasing of Company stock

Say on marginPay Support:

96%

 

During our 2023 outreach, our shareholders generally expressed support for the design and administration of our current programs, and our program was further endorsed by the results of the say-on-pay advisory vote conducted in 2023. Our Compensation Committee will continue to consider improvements to our programs in light of shareholder feedback, changing industry conditions, and evolving best practices.

19


What We Did in Response to What We Heard

•   Implemented a market-based clawback policy that applies to both cash and equity incentive compensation and applies to all of our Section 16 officers in December 2019

•   Implemented a prohibition on pledging of securities by our officers and directors in 2020

•   Developed a single, focused Compensation Peer Group

•   Improved and simplified our description of how annual incentives work in the CD&A

•   Added formulaic elements to the annual incentive plan, including pre-established threshold, target and maximum levels of financial performance and formal weights on individual performance measures

•   Added a per share metric to the annual incentive plan starting with the 2021 program

•   Adopted a single three-year performance period for PSU awards starting with 2020 awards

•   Increased target performance for our PSU awards to the 55th percentile of our peers starting with 2020 awards

•   Eliminated single-trigger vesting from equity incentive awards starting with 2020 awards

20202023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM SNAPSHOT

 

 

Compensation Philosophy and Guiding Principles

The philosophy underlying our executive compensation program is to employ the best leaders in our industry to ensure we execute on our business goals, promote both short-and long-term profitable growth of the Company and create long-term shareholder value. As such, our program is grounded in the following principles:

 

Competitiveness. Our executive compensation program should enable us to attract and retain key executives by providing a total compensation program that is competitive with the market where we compete for executive talent, which encompasses not only diversified midstream companies but also other companies in the energy industry.

Performance Accountability. Our executive compensation program should ensure an alignment between our strategic, operational and financial performance and the total compensation received by our NEOs. This includes providing compensation for performance that reflects individual and company performance both in absolute terms and relative to our Peer Group.

Shareholder Alignment. Our executive compensation program should ensure a balance between short-term and long-term compensation while emphasizing at-risk or variable compensation. Performance-based compensation acts as a valuable means of supporting our strategic goals and business objectives and aligning the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders.

Competitiveness. Our executive compensation program should enable us to attract and retain key executives by providing a total compensation program that is competitive with the market where we compete for executive talent, which encompasses not only diversified midstream companies but also other companies in the energy industry.

 

Performance Accountability. Our executive compensation program should ensure an alignment between our strategic, operational and financial performance and the total compensation received by our NEOs. This includes providing compensation for performance that reflects individual and company performance both in absolute terms and relative to our Peer Group.

20

Shareholder Alignment. Our executive compensation program should ensure a balance between short-term and long-term compensation while emphasizing at-risk or variable compensation. Performance-based compensation acts as a valuable means of supporting our strategic goals and business objectives and aligning the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S30


Good Governance Foundation

The following practices and policies in our executive compensation program promote sound compensation governance and align the interests of our shareholders and executives:

 

 

What We Do

  

 

What We Don’t Do

ü  Provide majority of NEO compensation in the form of performance-based, at-risk, long-term compensation

ü  Use a combination of absolute and relative performance metrics in incentive plans

ü  Maintain a comprehensive clawback policy aligned with current industry norms*norms and recent legal requirements

ü  Complete an annual compensation risk assessment

ü  Maintain executive and director share ownership guidelines

ü  Retain an independent consultant to advise the Committee

  

× No employment contracts

× No single-trigger change-in-control severance arrangements

× No single-trigger change-in-control vesting for NEO equity awards**awards

× No excise tax gross-ups

× No material perquisites or supplemental benefits not generally available to other employees

× No hedging or pledging**pledging of Company stock

× No executive compensation practices that promote excessive risk

  * Implemented in 2019

** Implemented in 2020

Elements of Pay

The following principle pay elements support the grounding principles of our program:

 

Element

 

Key Characteristics

Element 

    GroundingKey Characteristics

Guiding Principles

  

LOGO

Competitiveness 
  

LOGO

Performance
Accountability
  

LOGO

Shareholder
Alignment

Base

Salary

 

   Annual fixed cash compensation

   Critical factor in attracting and retaining qualified talent

  ü
    

Annual

Incentives

 

   Annual variable cash award

   Tied to achievement of key financial, operational, and strategic objectives

  ü  ü  ü

Long-

TermLong-Term

Incentives

 

   Equity-based awards vesting over multiple years:

  50% Performance share units (PSUs)

  50% Restricted stock units (RSUs)

   Ties a majority of NEO compensation to creation of long-term value and encourages NEOs to build meaningful equity ownership stakes

 

  ü  ü  ü

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S31

21


Pay Mix

Emphasis on at-risk variable compensation.We remain committed to our emphasis on at-risk, incentive-based pay – with payouts tied to our performance through several strategic and financial objectives including relative TSR, and realizable pay heavily dependent upon our ability to grow shareholder value. The charts below show the mix of total direct compensation of our CEO and our other NEOs for 2020.2023. These charts illustrate that a majority of NEO total direct compensation is at-risk (91% (90% for our CEO and an average of 82%82% for our other NEOs).

Target Total Direct Compensation Mix

 

LOGO

LOGO

CEO Pay at a Glance

Realizable pay aligned with performance.Our emphasis on at-risk, variable and performance-based pay elements, particularly equity incentives, helps to ensure actual compensation realized by our NEOs aligns with returns to our shareholders. As shown in the charts below, CEO realizable pay over the past threethree- and five yearfive-year periods has aligned closely with our total shareholder return performance.

 

LOGO

LOGO    LOGO

Target compensation is the sum of base salary, target bonus opportunity, and reported grant-date value of equity awards in each year. Realizable compensation includes base salary, actual annual cash incentive earned, and the value of any equity incentive grants valued based upon the period-ending stock price.price and target PSU payouts based upon relative performance. For our annual comparison of realizable pay to TSR performance, the applicable stock price is thecalculated as of December 31st31st of each year. For our three-year cumulative summary, the applicable stock price is the closing price on

22


December 31, 2020.2023. Any performance award granted and settled within the five-year or three-year period covered havehas been adjusted for actual payout percent. Awards that are still outstanding have been valued assuming a target payout. Note that the “realizable pay” calculations within this CD&A are not intended to be calculated in accordance with the SEC’s rules regarding “compensation actually paid” within the section below titled “Pay versus Performance.”

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S32


OUR DECISION MAKING PROGRESSPROCESS

 

 

The Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee oversees the executive compensation program for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of the Board. The Compensation Committee works very closely with its independent consultant and senior management to examine the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program throughout the year. Details of the Compensation Committee’s authority and responsibilities are specified in the Compensation Committee’s charter, which may be accessed at our website, www.targaresources.com, by clicking “Investors,” and then “Corporate Governance.”

The Role of Senior Management

Members of our senior management team attend regular meetings where executive compensation, Company and individual performance, and competitive compensation levels and practices are discussed and evaluated. The Executive Chairman andOur CEO review theirreviews his recommendations pertaining to NEO pay with the Compensation Committee, providing transparency and oversight. The Executive Chairman and CEO dodoes not participate in the deliberations of the Compensation Committee regarding theirhis own compensation. The members of the Compensation Committee make all final determinations regarding CEO and NEO compensation.

The Role of the Independent Consultant

The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage and retain an independent compensation consultant to provide independent counsel and advice. At least annually, the Compensation Committee formally conducts an evaluation as to the effectiveness of the independent compensation consultant and periodically requests proposals from other potential consulting firms to ensure the independent compensation consultant is meeting itsthe Compensation Committee’s needs. During 2019 and early 2020, the Compensation Committee retained the services of Pearl Meyer and Partners (Pearl Meyer). The primary consultant supporting the Committee left Pearl Meyer during 2020 and in July 2020,2023, the Compensation Committee retained the services of Meridian Compensation Partners (Meridian) as its independent compensation consultant with the same primary consultant for matters related to executive and non-management director compensation for the remainder of 2020 and for 2021.compensation.

The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of both Pearl Meyer and Meridian in 2020 as required under NYSE listing rules. The Compensation Committee has also considered and assessed all relevant factors, including but not limited to those set forth in Rule 10C-1(b)(4)(i) through (vi) under the Exchange Act, that could give rise to a potential conflict of interest with respect to the compensation consultants described above.Meridian. Based on this review, we are not aware of any conflicts of interest raised by the work performed by either firmMeridian that would prevent the consultantsconsultant from serving as an independent advisor to the Compensation Committee.

The Role of Market References in Setting Compensation

For purposes of setting compensation levels for 2020,2023, the Compensation Committee worked with its independent compensation consultant to review market data from our peers and from broader market survey sources to provide a reference and framework for decisions about the base salary and target annual and long-term incentives for each NEO. The Compensation Committee considers this information carefully and generally desires to be competitive approximately at the market median for total compensation opportunities, although we do not formally benchmark any item of compensation to a specific level compared to our peers. Consequently, in setting pay levels of our NEOs, the

23


Committee considers a variety of additional factors, including individual performance, competencies, skills, potential, prior experience, scope of responsibility and accountability within the organization.

Compensation Peer Group

For purposes of setting compensation levels for 2020, and in connection with our goal to improve our compensation programs, during 20192023, the Compensation Committee worked closely with Pearl MeyerMeridian and senior management to develop a representative peer group. The 20202023 compensation peer group, which was the same as our 2022 compensation peer group, consisted of a mix of 18 midstream and exploration and production companies.companies of similar financial size that we believe are a reasonable reflection of the market in which we compete for executive talent.

 

2020Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S33


2023 Compensation Peer Group

Buckeye Partners, L.P.

 APA Corporation

 

Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.

Cheniere Energy, Inc.

Marathon Oil Corporation

Concho Resources, Inc.

Noble Energy, Inc.

Crestwood Equity Partners, L.P.

NuStar Energy L.P.

Devon Energy Corporation

ONEOK, Inc.

Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.

Parsley Energy, Inc.

Enterprise Products Partners L.P.

 

NuStar Energy L.P.

 Cheniere Energy, Inc.

EnLink Midstream Partners, L.P.

ONEOK, Inc.

 Crestwood Equity Partners, L.P.(1)

Equitrans Midstream Corporation

Ovintiv, Inc.

 Devon Energy Corporation

Kinder Morgan, Inc.

Pioneer Natural Resources Company

EnLink Midstream Partners, L.P.

 Diamondback Energy, Inc.

 

Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.(2)

Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.

Kinder Morgan, Inc.

 Energy Transfer Equity LP

 

Marathon Oil Corporation

Williams Companies, Inc.

 

(1)

Crestwood Equity Partners LP was acquired by Energy Transfer LP in a transaction that closed on November 3, 2023.

(2)

Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. was acquired by ONEOK, Inc. in a transaction that closed on September 25, 2023.

Targa Percentile Rank vs. Peers – Key Financial Measures(1)

   

Annual revenues

64th percentile

 

Total Assets

41st percentile

 

Enterprise Value

68th percentile

41st percentile

52nd percentile

(1)

As presented to the Compensation Committee in July 2020.May 2023. Source: S&P Capital IQ

The Compensation Committee reviews the composition of our peer group every year with its independent consultant in order to ensure that the companies in the group continue to reflect an appropriate reference point for NEO compensation at Targa.

20202023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM IN DETAIL

 

 

Base Salary

In February 2020, theThe Compensation Committee authorizedapproved adjustments to base salaries for the NEOs for 2023 based on its assessment of the compensation market, expected salary increases across the midstream sector, and projected salary adjustments for all of the NEOs (other than the Executive Chairman) in order to recognize changing roles and to align more closely with competitive market practice. In May 2020, as part of Company-wide cost-cutting efforts in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and lower commodity prices, the CEO salary was reduced 15%, the other NEO salaries were reduced by 10% and the Board of Directors cash retainers were reduced by 10%. Based upon stronger-than-expected Adjusted EBITDA performance and improved business conditions, in October 2020 the Committee approved restoration of these temporary reductions.employees within Targa.

24


The 20202023 base salary rates for our NEOs were as follows:

 

NEO   2019 Salary      March 1, 2020  
Salary
    May 16, 2020  
Reduced
Salary
  October 31,
  2020 Salary  
  Percent    
Change 2019    
to October    
2020    

 

Year End   

2022 Salary   

 

 

Year End   

2022 Salary   

 

 

Year End   

2023 Salary   

 

 

Year End   

2023 Salary   

 

 

 Percent Change 

2022 to 2023

 

 

 Percent Change 

2022 to 2023

 

Perkins

 $        900,000  $        750,000  $        675,000  $        750,000  -17%
  

Meloy

  600,000   875,000   743,800   875,000  46%$ 900,000   $ 900,000   $ 985,000   $ 985,000   9%9%
  

Kneale

  400,000   575,000   517,500   575,000  44%  600,000     600,000     635,000     635,000   6%6%
  

McDonie

  500,000   525,000   472,500   525,000  5%  540,000     540,000     615,000     615,000   14%14%
  

Pryor

  500,000   525,000   472,500   525,000  5%  540,000     540,000     615,000     615,000   14%14%
  

Muraro

  500,000   525,000   472,500   525,000  5%  540,000     540,000     615,000     615,000   14%14%

Changes in base salary for Mr. Perkins, Mr. Meloy and Ms. Kneale in 2020 are largely reflective of changes in roles as part of our leadership transition.

Mr. Perkins’ base salary decrease reflects his transition to the Executive Chairman role effective March 1, 2020

Mr. Meloy’s base salary increase reflects the significant expansion of responsibilities he has assumed upon becoming CEO on March 1, 2020

Ms. Kneale’s base salary increase reflects the multi-year transition of her compensation to a level closer to similarly situated officers in connection with her appointment as Chief Financial Officer on March 1, 2018

March 2021 salaries for our NEOs are unchanged from those shown above, except for Mr. Perkins who is no longer an NEO.

Annual Incentives

For 2020,2023, our NEOs were eligible to receive annual incentive awards under the 20202023 Annual Incentive Compensation Program which consists of cash awards under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2020“2023 Bonus Plan”), which was approved by the Compensation Committee in January 2020.March 2023.

Target Bonus Amounts.Target bonus opportunities are expressed as a percentage of base salary and were established based on the NEO’s level of responsibility and ability to impact overall results. The Compensation Committee also considers market data in setting target bonus amounts. The 20202023 target bonus opportunities were as follows:

 

NEO  

2020 Target            
Bonus            

(% of Salary)            

  

2020 Target
Bonus

($)

 

Joe Bob Perkins

  125%            $937,500 

Matthew J. Meloy

  200%                   1,750,000 

Jennifer R. Kneale

  100%             575,000 

Patrick J. McDonie

  100%             525,000 

D. Scott Pryor

  100%             525,000 

Robert M. Muraro

  100%             525,000 
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S34

The 2021 target bonus opportunities for our current NEOs are unchanged from 2020.


   

 

 NEO

 

  

 

2023 Target Bonus
(% of Salary)

 

  

 

2023 Target Bonus
($)

 

   

 

 Matthew J. Meloy

 

  

 

175%

 

  

 

$ 1,723,750

 

   

 

 Jennifer R. Kneale

 

  

 

125%

 

  

 

    793,750

 

   

 

 Patrick J. McDonie

 

  

 

100%

 

  

 

    615,000

 

   

 

 D. Scott Pryor

 

  

 

100%

 

  

 

    615,000

 

   

 

 Robert M. Muraro

 

  

 

100%

 

  

 

    615,000

 

20202023 Bonus Plan Funding Levels. Annual bonus awards are based upon a rigorous evaluation of results across a variety of financial, operational and strategic categories. Performance is measured against a combination of:

 

Pre-established financial and operational goals; and

Key strategic business priorities.

Pre-established financial and operational goals; and

 

25


Key strategic business priorities.

Plan funding incorporates formulaic quantitative evaluation and qualitative evaluation based on a holistic evaluation by the Compensation Committee. We believe this balance of formulaic and qualitative evaluation is critical, reflecting the complexity of our business and our desire to ensure that decision-making over the short-term remains focused on producing sustainable growth over the long term.

Evaluation of 20202023 Performance.Our evaluation of performance in the annual incentive program includes consideration of performance on multiple factors within three general categories and with a safety category overlay:

 

 

Category

 

 

What did it includesinclude?

 

 

Why is it is importantimportant?

Financial

Performance

 

  Adjusted EBITDA

•  Balance sheet management

  Distributable cash flow per share

  % of G&P volumes with fees or fee-based floors

 

Adjusted EBITDA, Distributable Cash Flow per share, and balance sheet managementthe percent of G&P volumes with fees or fee-based floors together emphasize the importance of profitable growth groundedsupported by cash flow stability and less volatility to downside movements in prudent fiscal management

commodity prices.

Operational and

Commercial

Performance

 

•  Volume growth

•  Commercial execution

•  Capital  Cost discipline

  Project and commercial execution

 

Stresses

Emphasizes the importance of operational excellencecontinuing to grow profitably and optimization of asset utilization through increasing volumes, while focusedprudently by executing our major growth capital projects underway and focusing on commercial execution and capital discipline – key drivers of value creation

opportunities supporting our wellhead to water strategy, while continuing to be disciplined in our cost management.

Sustainability

 

•  Talent management and development

  Environmental, social and governance (ESG)

 

Promotes focus on investment

We strive to conduct our business sustainably, safely and with integrity, creating lasting benefits for our stakeholders, including investors, lenders, customers, employees, business partners, regulators and the communities in human capitalwhich we live and on incorporatingwork. Incorporating the interests of all of our key stakeholders in the execution of our business strategy to help ensure that annual performance leads to sustainable long-term growth

growth.

Safety

 

  A holistic scorecard including quantitative and qualitative evaluation of incident rates, severity, process improvement, and other safety-related items

  Operates outside plan as a modifier that can reduce plan payout if performance is below expectations, but will not be used to increase plan payouts

 Stresses

We prioritize safety everywhere in our organization and believe that “Zero is Achievable” – to operate and deliver our products without any injuries. Our philosophy stresses critical nature of safe operations and reinforces philosophy that strong safety performance is an expectation and not a justification for increased incentive compensation

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S35

26


The table below provides the more specific items within the first three general categories that our Compensation Committee used when setting and determining the 20202023 bonuses. Adjusted EBITDA and DCF per share goals were set at more challenging levels relative to 2022 goals and actual performance. Cost discipline goals were set at a higher level than 2022 reflecting expectations for growth and inflationary pressure. Continuing to restructure or add contracts that increased the percentage of G&P volumes with fees or fee-based floors was an important strategic goal for 2023 to increase cash flow stability and reduce volatility to downside commodity prices. Financial performance metrics have a maximum payout factor of 2.5 and operational performance metrics and sustainability metrics have a maximum payout factor of 2.0. The total plan is capped at a factor of 2.0 regardless of scoring for the individual components.

 

 

Category

 

 

Priorities

 

 

Achievements

 

 

Score

Financial

Performance

(60%)

 Adjusted EBITDA*

Threshold: $3,138 – Target $3,487 – Max: $4,010

Actual performance: $3,530 million

Adjusted EBITDA in 2023 was a record for Targa and 22% higher than 2022, driven by record Permian G&P, NGL transportation, fractionation and export volumes. Commodity prices were significantly lower than forecasted plan, but downside volatility was mitigated by fees and fee floors in G&P contracts. G&A and operating expenses were higher largely driven by higher labor, maintenance and rental costs from increased activity and system expansions, acquisitions and inflation.

1.12

Distributable cash flow per share

Threshold: $10.56 – Target: $11.73 – Max: $13.49

Actual performance: $11.76

Record adjusted EBITDA and a successful common share repurchase program that reduced common shares outstanding drove record DCF per share in 2023, although it was lower than initial expectations driven largely by higher than forecasted cash interest expense and maintenance capital expenditures. Cash interest expense was higher from floating interest rates on borrowings on our revolving credit facility, commercial paper program, accounts receivable securitization facility and term loan being higher than forecasted. Maintenance capital expenditures were higher from our growing infrastructure footprint and inflationary pressures.

 

 

Threshold: $1.44 – Target: $1.60 – Max: $1.76

Actual performance: $1.637 million

 

1.02

1.23

 

 

Debt/Adjusted EBITDA ratio

% of G&P volumes with fees or fee-based floors

Threshold: 70% – Target 75% – Max: 85%

Actual performance: 81% for FY 2023, and contractrestructurings completed prior to year-end resulted in ~90% as of YE 2023

Our commercial teams focused on identifying opportunities to add fees and fee floors to both new G&P contracts and restructure existing contracts to increase cash flow stability and minimize downside commodity price exposure. For 2023, aggressive goals were set organizationally to make significant progress in restructuring certain key existing contracts. Across 2023, we successfully added new contracts and restructured existing contracts, and in December 2023, we successfully restructured key existing contracts to finish year-end with ~90% of our G&P volumes under fee based or fee floor contracts.

 

 

Threshold: 5.5x – Target 5.25x – Max: 5.0x

Actual performance: 4.7x

 

2.00

2.00

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S36


 

Liquidity

Category

 

 

Maintain liquidity and minimize public equity needs

Actual performance: significant liquidity position maintained without raising any external equityPriorities

 

 

No negative discretion

Achievements

 

 Score 

Operational

and

Commercial

Performance

(30%)

 Volume growthCost discipline 

Threshold and maximum +/- 5% variance to 20% and 10% guidanceThreshold: $1,502MM – Target: $1,365MM – Max: $1,229 MM

Actual performance: Permian +19%$1,413 million

Actual performance: Field G&P +2%

Cost discipline continued to be an area of focus for our organization in 2023, challenged by increased throughput associated with a full year performance of assets acquired in 2022 and system expansions across our integrated footprint. Inflationary pressures also resulted in higher than forecasted labor, maintenance and rental costs.

 

 

0.80

0.00

0.82
 

Capital discipline

Project & commercial execution

 

Threshold: $1.50B – Target: 1.30B – Max: $1.11B

Actual performance: $598 million

2.00
Commercial execution

Continue focus on increasing G&P fee-based margin

Continue focus on execution of deals that benefit our integrated platform

Actual performance: increased G&P fee-based margin significantly, particularly in the Permian Basin; executed additional integrated commercial deals

No negative discretion
Project execution

Threshold set at achievement of quarterly in-service dates and planned budgets

for major projects. May exceed target if all major projects on time and under budgetwith successful commercial efforts to identify new opportunities for growth that support Targa’s wellhead to water strategy.

 

Results: Train 7, Train 8, LEP 3, PeregrineActual performance:

We were very successful in bringing major growth capital projects online on-time and Gatewayon-budget in 2023 and continued to progress projects expected in service in 2024 and beyond. Additionally, we entered into new commercial arrangements and restructured existing contracts expected to provide continued volume and margin growth in 2024 and beyond.

Key accomplishments included:

∎  Four Permian plants and the Galena Park export expansion were successfully completed on-time, on-budget and were highly utilized at start-up;

∎  Exited 2023 with approximately 90% of our G&P volumes supported by fees or fee floors;

∎  Completed the integration of two acquisitions made in 2022 in 2023;

∎  Negotiated and executed on timethe attractive acquisition of the remaining 25% interest in Grand Prix NGL Pipeline;

∎  Progress continued on other key major capital projects including additional Permian plants, fractionation trains and budgetthe Daytona NGL Pipeline; and

∎  Successfully negotiated additional contracts supporting Targa’s wellhead to water strategy.

 

 1.50

2.00

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S37


Category

Priorities

Achievements

 Score 

Sustainability

(10%)

 Talent Management 

Continue focusThreshold set at continuing to identify, train and retain talented employees.

Actual performance:

Our employees are the foundation to fostering safe operation of our assets and delivery of services to our customers. We exited 2023 employing a record approximately 3,182 people. Despite a competitive hiring landscape, we exceeded our expectations in our ability to identify quality talent to join Targa as we focused on identificationstaffing major growth capital projects coming into service early to ensure adequate training for our new employees. We are committed to employee growth and development. We closely monitor our employee retention, of talented employees

Actual performance: unplannedand successfully maintained our voluntary turnover flat compared to 2019rate at a low rate in 2023.

 

 No negative discretion1.00
 

ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance)

 

Continue

Threshold set at continuing to advance disclosures, investor and investorother stakeholder dialogue, progress toward methane intensity goals, and reduction in flaring from unplanned events.

Actual performance: published second annual Sustainability Report,

We are proud of the work that we continue to do to safely deliver energy, including to energy-poor areas of the world, in an environmentally and socially responsible way, caring for and being stewards of the environment, and operating our organization with increased disclosures; proactively maintained consistentsound governance.

We continued to make significant progress as an organization in 2023. Some of our accomplishments include:

∎  Enhanced our sustainability-related reporting with the publication of our TCFD index;

∎  Expanded our methane management plan disclosures and midstream flaring information;

∎  Increased aerial surveys/compressor station and gas plant methane monitoring;

∎  Continued our focus on flaring reduction;

∎  Continued our efforts with ONE Future and API on methane emissions;

∎  Worked closely with engine manufacturers on methane slip;

∎  Piloted new GTI Veritas draft QMRV protocols;

∎  Continued our dialogue with the investor community and other stakeholders;

∎  Adopted proxy access provisions in our Bylaws; and

∎  Established a formal overboarding policy.

 

 No negative discretion

1.00

2020

*

For a description of how Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as compared to values included in our financial statements, please see additional information on Appendix A.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S38


2023 Bonus Plan Payouts. Based on the assessment described above for 2020, the calculated bonus pool funding rate was 1.39 times the target level under the 2020 Bonus Plan. The Compensation Committee separately reviewed our safety performance for 2020,2023, which included improvements in process and communication, anda slight reduction in overall incident rate but also included an increaseand a decrease in severity. The Compensation Committee did not apply any adjustment to the pool to reflect safety performance.

27


Before determining the approved funding rate, the Committee also considered its appropriateness in light of broader market conditions and shareholder experience during 2020, including reduced distributions and stock price declines. While the Committee acknowledgedBased on the Company’s strong financial and operational performance induring 2023, the face of challenging conditions, they exercised their discretion to capCommittee approved the bonus pool for our NEOs at 1.0x1.35x target.

 

       

Category

  

 

Payout Factor

   

 

Weight

   

 

Weighted

Factor

      Payout Factor         Weight        Weighted Factor  
       
  

Financial

   1.6              60%    0.97   1.38 60% 0.83
    

Operational

   1.1              30%    0.32 

Operational and Commercial

  1.41 30% 0.42
    

Sustainability

   1.0              10%    0.10   1.00 10% 0.10
       
 

Total Calculated Payout

       1.39    

 

  

 

 1.35
       
 

Total Approved Payout

       1.00 

Total Approved Payout

 1.35
     

Individual Performance Multiplier.The Compensation Committee also evaluated the executive group and each officer’s individual performance for the year and determined that there were no special circumstances that would be quantified applicableresult in adjustment to any named executive officer’sNEO’s performance factor for 2020.2023. As a result, the Compensation Committee determined a performance multiplier of 1.0x should be applied to each named executive officer for 20202023 based on the officer’s individual performance and performance as part of the executive team.

Settlement of 20202023 Bonus Awards. The following table reflects the actual awards received by our NEOs under the 20202023 Bonus Plan:

 

  

NEO

 

Target Bonus

($)

 

  

Individual
Performance
Factor

 

  

Company
Performance
Factor

 

  

Actual Bonus

Paid (Cash)

 

  

   Target Bonus   

($)

 

Individual

   Performance   

Factor

 

Company

   Performance   

Factor

 

   Actual Bonus   

Paid (Cash)

Perkins

 $937,500   1.00   1.00  $937,500 
 

Meloy

          1,750,000   1.00   1.00     1,750,000  1,723,750 1.00 1.35 2,327,100
 

Kneale

  575,000   1.00   1.00   575,000  793,750 1.00 1.35 1,071,600
 

McDonie

  525,000   1.00   1.00   525,000  615,000 1.00 1.35 830,300

Prior

  525,000   1.00   1.00   525,000 
 

Pryor

 615,000 1.00 1.35 830,300
 

Muraro

  525,000   1.00   1.00   525,000  615,000 1.00 1.35 830,300

20212024 Annual Incentive Cash Compensation Program.For 2021,2024, our NEOs are eligible to receive annual cash awards under the 20212024 Annual Incentive Cash Compensation Program (the “2021“2024 Bonus Plan”), which was approved by the Compensation Committee in March 2021.2024. The payments under the 20212024 Bonus Plan consist of cash awards that may be made under our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.

28


Our evaluation of performance in the 20212024 Bonus Plan includeswill include consideration of performance on multiple factors within the following three general categoriescategories: Financial Performance, Operational and with a safetyCommercial Performance and Sustainability. The metrics evaluated within each category overlay:will be reflective of the year’s strategic priorities.

 

Category

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S
  

What it includes

Why it is important

Financial Performance

(60%)

•   Distributable cash flow per share

•   Adjusted EBITDA

•   Balance sheet management

• Reducing Debt / EBITDA ratio

Distributable cash flow per share, Adjusted EBITDA and balance sheet management together emphasize the importance of profitable growth grounded in prudent fiscal management

Operational Performance

(30%)

•   Operational execution

• Volume growth

Stresses the importance of operational excellence, project execution and optimization of asset utilization through increasing volumes, while focused on effective capital discipline while managing operating and G&A costs. Commercial execution to focus on integrated and fee-based business – key drivers of value creation

•   Operating cost and G&A discipline

•   Capital discipline

•   Project and commercial execution

Sustainability

(10%)

•   Environmental, social and governance performance (ESG)

Promotes focus on investment in human capital and on incorporating the interests of all key stakeholders in the execution of our business strategy to help ensure that annual performance leads to sustainable long-term growth

Safety

•   A holistic scorecard including quantitative and qualitative evaluation of incident rates, severity, process improvement, etc.

•   Operates outside plan as a modifier that can reduce plan payout if performance is below expectations

Stresses critical nature of safe operations and reinforces philosophy that strong safety performance is an expectation and not a justification for increased incentive compensation39

29


Long-Term Equity Incentives

Equity compensation directly aligns the interests of the NEOs with those of our stockholders. In 2020,2023, the Company granted equity compensation under our Stock Incentive Plan as follows:

 

Type of Equity Award  Weight  Description

  Type of Equity

  Award

Weight            Description

Performance Share

Units (PSUs)

 50% Vest at the end of a three-year period contingent on the achievement of the Company’s total shareholder return (TSR) relative to the TSR of a specified comparator group of publicly-traded midstream companies (the “LTIP Peer Group”) measured over the three year period

Restricted Stock Units

(RSUs)

 50% Vest in full at the end of a three-year period based solely on continued service; RSUs help to secure and retain executives and instill an ownership mentality

We express target long-termLong-term equity incentive awards are expressed as a total dollar value based on a percentage of the NEO’s base salary.salary and were established based on the NEO’s level of responsibility and ability to impact overall results. The Compensation Committee also considers market data in setting target long-term equity incentive awards. For awards granted in 2020,2023, the specified percentage of each NEO’s base salary used for purposes of determining the amount of long-term equity incentive awards granted and the corresponding dollar values are set forth in the following table:

 

  
NEO 

  Target Award  

(% of Salary)

 

  Target Award  

($ Value)

 

Number of
  RSUs Granted   

(#)

 

Number of
  PSUs Granted   

(#)

  Target Award  
(% of Salary)
  Target Award  
(% of Salary)
  Target Award  
($ Value)
  Target Award  
($ Value)

Number of
  RSUs Granted  

(#)

Number of
  RSUs Granted  

(#)

Number of
  PSUs Granted  
(#)
Number of
  PSUs Granted  
(#)

Perkins

 600% 

$        4,500,000     

 

55,255     

 

55,255     

  

Meloy

 800% 

7,000,000     

 

85,593     

 

85,953     

800%800%7,880,0007,880,00053,56253,56253,56253,562
  

Kneale

 400% 

2,300,000     

 

28,242     

 

28,242     

450%450%2,857,5002,857,50019,42319,42319,42319,423
  

McDonie

 325% 

1,706,250     

 

20,951     

 

20,951     

325%325%1,998,7501,998,75013,58613,58613,58613,586
  

Pryor

 325% 

1,706,250     

 

20,951     

 

20,951     

325%325%1,998,7501,998,75013,58613,58613,58613,586
  

Muraro

 325% 

1,706,250     

 

20,951     

 

20,951     

325%325%1,998,7501,998,75013,58613,58613,58613,586

The number of shares subject to each award is determined by dividing the total dollar value allocated to the award by the ten-day average closing price of the shares measured over a period prior to the date of grant.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S40

2020


2023 PSU Plan Design

PSUs vest depending on the satisfaction of certain service-related conditions and the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of the members of the LTIP Peer Group measured over a single three-year performance period. For the 20202023 PSUs, the LTIP Peer Group was composed of the companies that make up the Alerian US Midstream Index (AMUS), using the following payout schedule:

 

Relative TSR Attainment vs.

Companies
in the Alerian US

Midstream Index

 Guideline Performance
Percentage (%
(%
of target)

Below 25th25th percentile

 0%

25th25th percentile

 50%

55th 55th percentile

 100%

75th75th percentile or higher

 250%

30


As shown inTarget payout is set at the table, in 2020 we shifted our target payout from the 50th percentile to the 55th55th percentile to ensure that a target payout requires performance above the median of our performance peers. Payout for performance between threshold and target or between target and maximum are calculated using straight-line interpolation.

The performance period for the 20202023 PSUs began on January 1, 20202023 and ends on December 31, 20222025 and TSR for the period is measured using the following formula:

 

 

   TSR =   

  

TSR =

Average closing price at end of period + dividends paid over period

  

Average closing price at beginning of period

2018202120202023 PSU Plan Payout

The PSUs granted to our NEOs in 20182021 used a similar structure as the 20202023 PSUs except thatfor the performance period consisted of three annual periods (2018, 2019 and 2020) and a cumulative three year period that began onfrom January 1, 2018 and ended on2021 through December 31, 2020.2023. The LTIP Peer Group for the 20182021 PSUs was a subsetthe companies in the AMUS index as of the midstream companies included inbeginning of the 2018 compensation peer group. The TSR performance factor was based on relative TSR performance over the designated weighting periods as follows:period.

Weighting PeriodPercent of Award        

Annual relative TSR for Year 1

25%        

Annual relative TSR for Year 2

25%        

Annual relative TSR for Year 3

25%        

Cumulative relative TSR over the three-year performance period

25%        

On January 19, 2021,18, 2024, our Compensation Committee determined that the overall vesting percentage that was earned for the 20182021 PSUs was 173%250% of target grant amounts, andbased upon performance in the corresponding shares became vested.top decile of the AMUS index companies:

 

Performance Period    Targa Percentile
Rank
    Weight          Percent of Target        
Earned         

Year 1 TSR

    56th    25%          134%        

Year 2 TSR

    56th    25%          134%        

Year 3 TSR

    63th    25%          175%        

Cumulative 3 year TSR

    75th    25%          250%        

Weighted Average

            173%        
   
Targa 3-year
TSR Performance
 Targa Percentile
Rank in AMUS
 Percent of Target
Earned
   

 

248%

 

97th percentile

(2nd out of 36 companies)

 

 

250%

Because vesting did not occur until our Compensation Committee determined the achievement of applicable performance goals at the beginning of 2021,2024, these awards were still considered “outstanding” as of December 31, 20202023 for purposes of the compensation tables that follow this CD&A.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S41

31


OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PRACTICES AND POLICIES

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In 2017, ourOur Compensation Committee has adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines for our independent directors and executive officers. We believe that our Stock Ownership Guidelines align the interests of our executive officers and independent directors with the interests of our stockholders. The guidelines below were established with advice from the Compensation Consultant and are believed to follow market standards.

 

Ownership Requirement
  Ownership Requirement

Chief Executive Officer

 5.0 x base salary

Other Executives

 3.0 x base salary

Nonemployee Directors

 5.0 x annual cash retainer

The CEO, executive officers and directors have five years from the date first subject to the guidelines to meet the applicable ownership levels. Stock owned directly by an officer or independent director as well as unvested restricted stock units will count for purposes of determining stock ownership levels. All NEOs are compliant with our Stock Ownership Guidelines.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

All of our officers, employees and directors are subject to our Insider Trading Policy, which, among other things, prohibits officers, employees and directors from engaging in certain short-term or speculative transactions involving our securities. Specifically, the policy provides that officers employees and directors may not engage in the following transactions: (i) the purchase of our common stock on margin, (ii) short sales of our common stock, or (iii) the purchase or sale of options of any kind, whether puts or calls, or other derivative securities, relating to our common stock. We have also amended ourOur Insider Trading Policy soalso specifies that officers, employees and directors may not enter into pledges of our securities as collateral. In order to allow time to unwind any existing pledge arrangements, such arrangements must be cancelled or modified so that the securities are no longer pledged by April 2022.

Recoupment ClawbackIncentive Compensation Recovery Policy

In December 2019,September 2023, our Board adopted an executive incentive compensation clawback policy.recovery policy effective as of October 2023, to comply with Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 following implementation of final rules by the NYSE. Our policy provides that performance-based incentiveincentive-based compensation (cash or equity) paid to our current or former Section 16 officers maymust be recovered (unless impracticable) in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial results or under certain other circumstances,that would result in such as an officer’s misconduct that results in an adverse impact on the Company’s financial or stock price performance.officers receiving erroneously awarded compensation. In connection with such events,event, the Compensation Committee will have the right to require the reimbursement or forfeiture of any performance-based incentive payments,incentive-based compensation, including payments under the annual incentive plan and performance-based PSUs, paid to the officer to the extent permitted by applicable law. The clawback policy applies to all performance-based incentiveincentive-based compensation granted following the adoption ofdeemed “received” under the clawback policy.rules on or after October 2, 2023.

In addition, the Company will take action to modify the clawback policy to comply with Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 should the SEC determine and implement final rules. Furthermore, restricted stock, restricted stock unit and performance share unit agreements covering awards made to our named executive officers and other applicable employees include language providing that any compensation, payments or benefits provided under such an award (including profits realized from the sale of earned shares) are subject to clawback to the extent required by applicable law.

32


Compensation Risk Assessment

The Compensation Committee reviews the relationship between our risk management policies and compensation policies and practices each year and, for 2020,2023, has concluded that we do not have any compensation policies or practices that expose us to excessive or unnecessary risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. Because our Compensation Committee retains the sole discretion for determining the actual amount paid to executives pursuant to our annual incentive bonus program, our Compensation Committee is able to assess the actual behavior of our executives as it relates to risk-taking in awarding bonus amounts. In addition, the performance objectives applicable to our annual bonus program consist of diverse company-wide and business

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S42


unit goals, including commercial, operational and financial goals to support our business plan and priorities, which we believe lessens the potential incentive to focus on meeting certain short-term goals at the expense of longer-term risk. Further, our use of long-term equity incentive compensation for 20202023 with three-year vesting periods in combination with meaningful ownership requirements serves our executive compensation program’s goal of aligning the interests of executives and shareholders, thereby reducing the incentives to unnecessary risk-taking.

Retirement, Health and Welfare, and Other Benefits

Employees are eligible to participate in a section 401(k) tax-qualified, defined contribution plan (the “401(k) Plan”), which helps employees save for retirement through a tax-advantaged combination of employee and company contributions and directly manage their retirement plan assets through a variety of investment options. Under the plan, participants may elect to defer up to 30% of their eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis (or on a post-tax basis via a Roth contribution), subject to certain limitations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In addition, we make the following contributions to the 401(k) Plan for the benefit of our employees, including our NEOs: (i) 3% of the employee’s eligible compensation, and (ii) an amount equal to the employee’s contributions to the 401(k) Plan up to 5% of the employee’s eligible compensation. The 5% matching contribution by the Company was suspended on June 1, 2020 but was reinstated effective January 1, 2021. In addition, we may also make discretionary contributions to the 401(k) Plan for the benefit of employees depending on our performance. Company contributions to the 401(k) Plan may be subject to certain limitations under the Code for certain employees. We do not maintain a defined benefit pension plan or a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for our NEOs or other employees.

All full-time employees, including our NEOs, are eligible to participate in our health and welfare benefit programs, including medical, life insurance, dental coverage and disability insurance. It is the Compensation Committee’s policy not to pay for perquisites for any of our NEOs, other than minimal parking subsidies.

Change in Control and Severance Benefits

Our ability to build the exceptional leadership team we have today was due in large part to our having the full complement of compensation tools available to us and the flexibility to use them. This includes the ability to leverage change in control and severance benefits.

The Compensation Committee believes that together, our change in control and severance benefits, which are guided by our governance practices and policies, are well-aligned with those of our peers. More importantly, they foster stability and focus within the senior leadership team by helping to ensure that personal concerns regarding job security do not hinder mergers, reorganizations or other transactions that may be in the best interest of shareholders.

Please see “Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below for further information.

33


Accounting Considerations

We account for the equity compensation expense for our employees, including our named executive officers, under the rules of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. This regulation requires us to record an expense for each award of long-term equity incentive compensation over the vesting period of the award based on the fair value at the grant date. Accounting rules also require us to record cash compensation as an expense at the time the obligation is accrued.

Tax Considerations

We consider the impact of various tax rules in implementing our compensation program. Section 162(m) of the Code (“Section 162(m)”) generally limits the deductibility by a corporation of compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to certain executive officers. Due to the fact that our executive officers provide services to both us and to certain non-corporate subsidiaries, we have historically designed incentive awards that are not subject to the deduction limitations of Section 162(m). However, recent regulations were published with respect to Section 162(m) that will alter the way that compensation is allocated between services to us and our subsidiaries, and certain compensation granted to our covered executive officers may become subject to the deductibility restrictions of 162(m). Our Compensation Committee believes that its primary responsibility is to provide a compensation program that is consistent with its compensation philosophy and supports the achievement of its compensation objectives. Therefore, the Compensation Committee has retained the authority to grant appropriate compensation items or awards to our service providers notwithstanding an adverse tax or accounting treatment for that compensation.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S43


Compensation Committee Report

Messrs. Davis, CrispMses. Bowman and EvansCooksen and Ms. BowmanMr. Teague are the current members of our Compensation Committee. Effective March 15, 2021, the Board of Directors appointed Ms. Bowman as a member of the Compensation Committee. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee as composed prior to March 15, 2021, has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.2023. Based on these reviews and discussions, the Compensation Committee as composed prior to March 15, 2021, recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.2023.

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act.

The Compensation Committee

 

Waters S. Davis, IV,

Beth A. Bowman

 Charles R. Crisp,Lindsey M. Cooksen Robert B. Evans,R. Keith Teague
Chairman

CHAIRMAN

 Committee MemberCOMMITTEE MEMBER Committee MemberCOMMITTEE MEMBER

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S44

34


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table for 20202023

The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth the compensation of our named executive officers for 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018.2021. Additional details regarding the applicable elements of compensation in the Summary Compensation Table are provided in the footnotes following the table.

 

Name and Principal Position

  Year         Salary           Bonus (1)     Stock
  Awards ($)  
(2) (3)
  All Other
 Compensation 

(4)
          Total         

Joe Bob Perkins

  2020   $ 746,875   $ 937,500   $ 9,504,775   $ 24,110   $ 11,213,260 

Executive Chairman

  2019   891,667      11,545,172   23,710   12,460,549 
  2018   833,333      12,624,959   23,310   13,481,602 

Matthew J. Meloy

  2020   $ 779,967   $ 1,750,000   $ 9,548,519   $ 24,110   $ 12,102,596 

Chief Executive Officer

  2019   587,500   1,920,000   3,921,450   23,710   6,452,660 
  2018   516,667   1,115,625   3,914,716   23,037   5,570,045 

Jennifer R. Kneale

  2020   $ 524,271   $ 575,000   $ 3,137,404   $ 24,056   $ 4,260,731 

Chief Financial Officer

  2019   391,667   640,000   2,091,404   23,274   3,146,345 
  2018   332,500   446,250   1,166,427   22,535   1,967,712 

Patrick J. McDonie

  2020   $ 501,146   $ 525,000   $ 2,327,447   $ 23,947   $ 3,377,540 

President – Gathering and Processing

  2019   495,833   800,000   2,124,127   23,492   3,443,452 
  2018   466,667   807,500   1,803,674   22,928   3,100,769 

D. Scott Pryor

  2020   $ 501,146   $ 525,000   $ 2,327,447   $ 23,947   $ 3,377,540 

President – Logistics and

  2019   495,833   800,000   2,124,127   23,492   3,443,452 

Transportation

  2018   466,667   807,500   1,803,674   22,928   3,100,769 
  2020   $ 501,146   $ 525,000   $ 2,327,447   $ 23,947   $ 3,377,540 

Robert M. Muraro

  2019   491,667   800,000   2,124,127   23,492   3,439,286 

Chief Commercial Officer

  2018   433,333   765,000   1,666,299   22,764   2,887,396 

       
Name and
Principal Position
YearSalaryBonus
(1)
Stock
Awards ($)
(2)
All Other
Compensation
(3)
Total
       

Matthew J. Meloy

Chief Executive Officer

 

2023

 

$  970,475

 

$  2,327,100

 

$ 10,864,516

 

$  29,539

 

$  14,191,630

 

2022

 

900,000

 

3,600,000

 

10,675,003

 

27,539

 

15,202,542

 

2021

 

875,000

 

3,500,000

 

10,289,456

 

27,484

 

14,691,940

       

Jennifer R. Kneale

Chief Financial Officer

 

2023

 

$  629,167

 

$  1,071,600

 

$  3,939,761

 

$  29,539

 

$   5,670,067

 

2022

 

600,000

 

1,500,000

 

4,003,208

 

27,539

 

6,130,747

 

2021

 

575,000

 

1,150,000

 

3,380,808

 

26,015

 

5,131,823

       

Patrick J. McDonie

President – Gathering and Processing

 

2023

 

$  602,500

 

$ 830,300

 

$   2,755,784

 

$  29,539

 

$   4,218,123

 

2022

 

540,000

 

1,080,000

 

2,601,978

 

27,225

 

4,249,203

 

2021

 

525,000

 

1,050,000

 

2,508,037

 

25,770

 

4,108,807

       

D. Scott Pryor

President – Logistics and Transportation

 

2023

 

$  602,500

 

$    830,300

 

$   2,755,784

 

$  29,539

 

$   4,218,123

 

2022

 

540,000

 

1,080,000

 

2,601,978

 

27,225

 

4,249,203

 

2021

 

525,000

 

1,050,000

 

2,508,037

 

25,770

 

4,108,807

       

Robert M. Muraro

Chief Commercial Officer

 

2023

 

$  602,500

 

$    830,300

 

$   2,755,784

 

$  29,539

 

$   4,218,123

 

2022

 

540,000

 

1,080,000

 

2,601,978

 

27,225

 

4,249,203

 

2021

 

525,000

 

1,050,000

 

2,508,037

 

25,770

 

4,108,807

 

(1)

For 2020,2023, amounts reported in the “Bonus” column representsrepresent the portion of the bonus awarded pursuant to our 20202023 Bonus Plan that was paid to the named executive officers in cash. The Compensation Committee determined that each named executive officer’s total bonus amount would be settled in cash. Please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Components of Executive Compensation Program for Fiscal 2020—Year 2023—Annual Incentive Bonus.” As discussed in the CD&A, payments pursuant to our Bonus Plan are ultimately discretionary and not based solely on a formulaic performance structure.

 

(2)

Amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” column for 20202023 represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock unit and performance share unit awards granted under our Stock Incentive Plan in 2020 (including restricted stock unit awards granted on January 16, 2020 in connection with 100% of the bonus for Mr. Perkins under the 2019 Bonus Plan that we granted in the form of restricted stock units, described below)2023 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, disregarding the estimate of forfeitures. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 25—22—Compensation Plans to our “Consolidated Financial Statements” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2020.2023. Detailed information about the value attributable to specific awards is reported in the table under “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2020”2023” below. The grant date fair value of each restricted stock unit subject to the restricted stock unit awards granted on January 16, 2020,19, 2023, assuming vesting will occur, is $41.39.$74.13. The grant date fair value of each performance share unit subject to the performance share unit awards granted on January 16, 2020,19, 2023, assuming vesting will occur, is $69.70$128.71 which is the per unit fair value determined using a Monte Carlo Simulation valuation methodology in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assuming, instead, a payout percentage for these performance unit awards of 250%, which is the maximum payout percentage under the awards, the aggregate grant date fair value of the equity-settled performance unit awards granted on January 16, 202019, 2023 for each

35


named executive officer is as follows: Mr. Perkins – $9,628,184; Mr. Meloy – $14,977,310;$9,926,378; Ms. Kneale – $4,921,169;$3,599,567; Mr. McDonie – $3,650,712;$2,517,825; Mr. Pryor – $3,650,712;$2,517,825; and Mr. Muraro – $3,650,712. For 2019, the Compensation Committee provided that bonuses to our named executive officers under the 2019 Bonus Plan would be (i) 100% restricted stock unit awards equal to Mr. Perkins’ total bonus amount and (ii) cash equal to each of the other named executive officer’s total bonus amount. The restricted stock unit award will vest in one year after the date of award, subject to continued employment of Mr. Perkins through that date. Because this award was granted on January 16, 2020, it is reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for 2020 in accordance with SEC rules. For 2018, the Compensation Committee provided that bonuses to our named executive officers under the 2018 Bonus Plan would be (i) 100% restricted stock unit awards equal to Mr. Perkins’ total bonus amount and (ii) cash equal to each of the other named executive officer’s total bonus amount. The restricted stock unit award will vest in full three years after the date of award, subject to continued employment of Mr. Perkins through that date. Because this award was granted on January 17, 2019, it is reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for 2019 in accordance with SEC rules.$2,517,825.

 

(3)

On January 12, 2018, the Compensation Committee awarded a special performance/retention award to Mr. Perkins. The special performance/retention award consisting of 80,000 units was granted in the form of restricted stock units that vested 50% on December 31, 2018 and 50% on December 31, 2019.

(4)

For 2020,2023, “All Other Compensation” includes (i) the aggregate value of all employer-provided contributions to each named executive officer under our 401(k) plan and (ii) the dollar value of life insurance premiums paid by the Company with respect to life insurance for the benefit of each named executive officer.

 

                                                                                       

 Name

 401(k) and Profit
Sharing Plan
  Dollar Value of
Life Insurance
Premiums
      Total     

 Joe Bob Perkins

  $ 22,800    $ 1,310    $ 24,110  

 Matthew J. Meloy

  22,800    1,310    24,110  

 Jennifer R. Kneale

  22,800    1,256    24,056  

 Patrick J. McDonie

  22,800    1,147    23,947  

 D. Scott Pryor

  22,800    1,147    23,947  

 Robert M. Muraro

  22,800    1,147    23,947  
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S45


    
Name  401(k) and Profit 
Sharing Plan
  Dollar Value of
  Life Insurance Premiums  
  Total 
    

Matthew J. Meloy

  $  26,400   $  3,139            $  29,539     
    

Jennifer R. Kneale

  26,400   3,139          29,539     
    

Patrick J. McDonie

  26,400   3,139          29,539     
    

D. Scott Pryor

  26,400   3,139          29,539     
    

Robert M. Muraro

  26,400   3,139          29,539     

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 20202023

The following table and the footnotes thereto provide information regarding grants of plan-based equity awards made to the named executive officers during 2020:2023:

 

    

Name

   Grant Date    Estimated Future Payouts Under Performance
                             Share Unit Awards                         
  Equity Awards:
Number of
          Units          
 Grant Date
Fair Value of
Equity Awards
             (3)             
  Grant Date  Grant Date  Estimated Future Payouts Under Performance 
Share Unit Awards
 Estimated Future Payouts Under Performance 
Share Unit Awards

 Equity Awards: 
Number
of Units

(#)

 

 Equity Awards: 
Number
of Units

(#)

 

Grant Date
Fair Value of
 Equity Awards 
(2)($)

 

Grant Date
Fair Value of
 Equity Awards 
(2)($)

 

Threshold (#)   Target (#)   Maximum (#)    Threshold (#) Threshold (#)  Target (#)  Target (#)  Maximum (#)  Maximum (#) 

 Equity Awards: 
Number
of Units

(#)

 

 Equity Awards: 
Number
of Units

(#)

 

Mr. Perkins

  01/16/20 (1)    27,628    55,255    138,138    55,255    $ 6,138,228  
  01/16/20 (2)       81,336    3,366,497  
  

Mr. Meloy

  01/16/20 (1)    42,977    85,953    214,883    85,953    9,548,518  01/19/23(1)01/19/23(1)26,78126,78153,56253,562133,905133,90553,56253,56210,864,51610,864,516
  

Ms. Kneale

  01/16/20 (1)    14,121    28,242    70,605    28,242    3,137,404  01/19/23 (1)01/19/23 (1)9,7129,71219,42319,42348,55848,55819,42319,4233,939,7613,939,761
  

Mr. McDonie

  01/16/20 (1)    10,476    20,951    52,378    20,951    2,327,447  01/19/23 (1)01/19/23 (1)6,7936,79313,58613,58633,96533,96513,58613,5862,755,7842,755,784
  

Mr. Pryor

  01/16/20 (1)    10,476    20,951    52,378    20,951    2,327,447  01/19/23 (1)01/19/23 (1)6,7936,79313,58613,58633,96533,96513,58613,5862,755,7842,755,784
  

Mr. Muraro

  01/16/20 (1)    10,476    20,951    52,378    20,951    2,327,447  01/19/23 (1)01/19/23 (1)6,7936,79313,58613,58633,96533,96513,58613,5862,755,7842,755,784

 

(1)

These grants on January 16, 202019, 2023 are the annual long-term equity incentive awards for 20202023 granted to our named executive officers in the form of restricted stock unit and performance share unit awards granted under our Stock Incentive Plan. For a detailed description of how performance achievements will be determined for performance share units, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – 20202023 Components of Executive Compensation Program In Detail – 20202023 PSU Plan Design.”

 

(2)

This grant, also made on January 16, 2020, is a restricted stock unit award granted to Mr. Perkins in lieu of 100% of the cash payments under the 2019 Bonus Plan.

36


(3)

The value within the “Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards” column was determined by multiplying the shares awarded by the grant date fair value per share computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718: $41.39$74.13 for the January 16, 202019, 2023 restricted stock unit awards; and $69.70$128.71 for the January 16, 202019, 2023 performance share units.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan Based Awards Table

A discussion of 20202023 salaries, bonuses, incentive plans and awards is set forth in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” including a discussion of the material terms and conditions of the 20202023 restricted stock unit and performance share unit awards under our Stock Incentive Plan. Further discussion regarding restricted stock units granted in January 2020 in lieu of a cash payment under our 2019 Bonus Plan are described in our proxy statement for our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2020.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S46


Outstanding Equity Awards at 20202023 Fiscal Year-End

The following table and the footnotes related thereto provide information regarding equity-based awards outstanding as of December 31, 20202023 for each of our named executive officers. None of our named executive officers held any outstanding stock option awards as of December 31, 2020.2023.

 

 
Stock AwardsStock Awards
  Stock Awards   

Name

  

Number of Shares That
Have Not Vested (1)

   

Market Value of
Shares That Have Not
Vested (2)

   

Performance
Share Units:
Number of
Unearned Units
That Have Not
Vested (3)

   

Performance
Share Units:
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Units
That Have Not
Vested (4)

 Number of  
Shares That  
Have Not  
Vested
(1)  
Number of  
Shares That  
Have Not  
Vested
(1)  

Market Value  

of Shares  
That Have Not  
Vested
 (2)  

Market Value  

of Shares  
That Have Not  
Vested
 (2)  

Performance Share  
Units: Number of  
Unearned Units That  
Have Not Vested
 (3)  
Performance Share  
Units: Number of  
Unearned Units That  
Have Not Vested
 (3)  
Performance Share  
Units: Market or  
Payout Value of  
Unearned Units That  
Have Not Vested
(4)  
Performance Share  
Units: Market or  
Payout Value of  
Unearned Units That  
Have Not Vested
(4)  
  

Joe Bob Perkins

   460,612   $        12,150,945    336,878   $        8,886,842 

Matthew J. Meloy

   252,931    6,672,320    306,258    8,079,086 
  

Jennifer R. Kneale

   106,707    2,814,931    119,338    3,148,136 
  

Patrick J. McDonie

   122,774    3,238,778    101,873    2,687,410 
  

D. Scott Pryor

   122,774    3,238,778    101,873    2,687,410 
  

Robert M. Muraro

   134,994    3,561,142    101,873    2,687,410 

 

(1)

Represents the following shares of restricted stock units (and earned performance units) under our Stock Incentive Plan held by our named executive officers:

 

   Joe Bob
Perkins
   Matthew J.
Meloy
   Jennifer R.
Kneale
   Patrick J.
McDonie
   D. Scott
Pryor
   Robert M.
Muraro
 

January 6, 2016 Award (a)

           5,000            —   

January 20, 2017 Award (b)

       50,000    30,000    45,000    45,000    60,000   

January 17, 2018 Award (c)

   46,987    26,383    7,915    11,935    11,935    11,307   

January 17, 2018 Award (d)

   45,831    8,402    2,364    4,442    4,442    3,377   

January 17, 2018 Award (e)

   81,288    45,643    13,693    20,648    20,648    19,561   

January 17, 2019 Award (f)

   79,496    36,550    19,493    19,798    19,798    19,798   

January 17, 2019 Award (g)

   70,419                    —   

January 16, 2020 Award (h)

   55,255    85,953    28,242    20,951    20,951    20,951   

January 16, 2020 Award (i)

   81,336                    —   

Total

   460,612    252,931    106,707    122,774    122,774    134,994   
      
 

 

Matthew J.  
Meloy  
Jennifer R.  
Kneale  
Patrick J.  
McDonie  
D. Scott  
Pryor  
Robert M.  
Muraro  
      

January 19, 2021 Award (a)

118,967  39,089  28,998  28,998  28,998  
      

January 19, 2021 Award (b)

297,418  97,723  72,495  72,495  72,495  
      

January 20, 2022 Award (c)

64,748  24,281  15,782  15,782  15,782  
      

January 19, 2023 Award (d)

53,562  19,423  13,586  13,586  13,586  
      

Total

534,695  180,516  130,861  130,861  130,861  

 

37


 (a)

The restricted stock units awarded January 6, 2016 vested on January 6,19, 2021 contingent upon continuous employment through the end of the vesting period. The underlying shares of stock are not issued until vesting at the end of the vesting period.

(b)

The restricted stock units awarded January 20, 2017 as a retention grant vest (i) 30% on January 20, 2021, (ii) 30% on January 20, 2022 and (iii) 40% on January 20, 2023, contingent upon continuous employment through the end of the vesting period. The underlying shares of stock are not issued until vesting at the end of the vesting period.

(c)

The restricted stock units awarded January 17, 2018 are subject to the following vesting schedule: 100% of the restricted stock units vestedvest on January 17, 2021,19, 2024, contingent upon continuous employment or the satisfaction of certain other service-related conditions upon the executive’s retirement, in either case, through the end of the vesting period. The underlying shares of stock are not issued until vesting at the end of the vesting period.

 

 (d)(b)

The awards in this row originally related to performance share units granted in 2021, but for which the performance period ended on December 31, 2023. Because the awards were no longer subject to performance conditions, but would not be deemed “vested” until the Compensation Committee certified performance levels in early 2024, they are still deemed to be outstanding for purposes of this table, subject only to time-based vesting requirements. The target awards were multiplied by 250%, the actual adjustment factor applied to the awards upon determination of performance levels in 2024.

(c)

The restricted stock units awarded January 17, 2018 in settlement (with respect to Mr. Perkins) and in partial settlement (with respect to the other named executive officers) of awards under the 2017 Bonus Plan20, 2022 are subject to the following vesting schedule: 100% of the restricted stock units vestedvest on January 17, 2021,20, 2025, contingent upon continuous employment or the satisfaction of certain other service-related conditions upon the executive’s retirement, in either case, through the end of the vesting period. The underlying shares of stock are not issued until vesting at the end of the vesting period.

 

 (e)(d)

The awards in this row originally related to performance share units granted in 2018, but for which the performance period ended on December 31, 2020. Because the awards were no longer subject to performance conditions, but would not be deemed “vested” until the Compensation Committee determined performance levels in early 2021, they are still deemed to be outstanding for purposes of this table, subject only to time-based vesting requirements. The target awards were multiplied by 173%, the actual adjustment factor applied to the awards upon determination of performance levels in 2021.

(f)

The restricted stock units awarded January 17, 201919, 2023 are subject to the following vesting schedule: 100% of the restricted stock units vest on January 17, 2022,19, 2026, contingent upon continuous employment or the satisfaction of certain other service-related conditions upon the executive’s retirement, in either case, through the end of the vesting period. The underlying shares of stock are not issued until vesting at the end of the vesting period.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S(g)

The restricted stock units awarded January 17, 2019 in settlement of an award under the 2018 Bonus Plan are subject to the following vesting schedule: 100% of the restricted stock units vest January 17, 2022, contingent upon continuous employment or the satisfaction of certain other service-related conditions upon the executive’s retirement, in either case, through the end of the vesting period. The underlying shares of stock are not issued until vesting at the end of the vesting period.

  (h)

The restricted stock units awarded January 16, 2020 are subject to the following vesting schedule: 100% of the restricted stock units vest on January 16, 2023, contingent upon continuous employment or the satisfaction of certain other service-related conditions upon the executive’s retirement, in either case, through the end of the vesting period. The underlying shares of stock are not issued until vesting at the end of the vesting period.

47

(i)

The restricted stock units awarded January 16, 2020 in settlement of an award under the 2019 Bonus Plan are subject to the following vesting schedule: 100% of the restricted stock units vest January 16, 2023, contingent upon continuous employment or the satisfaction of certain other service-related conditions upon the executive’s retirement, in either case, through the end of the vesting period. The underlying shares of stock are not issued until vesting at the end of the vesting period.


The treatment of the outstanding restricted stock unit awards upon certain terminations of employment (including retirement) or the occurrence of a change in control is described below under “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

 

(2)

The dollar amounts shown are determined by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock units reported in the table by the closing price of a share of our common stock on December 31, 202029, 2023 ($26.38)86.87), which was the last trading day of fiscal 2020.year 2023. The amounts do not include any related dividends accrued with respect to the awards.

 

38


(3)

Represents the following performance share units linked to the performance of the Company’s common stock held by our named executive officers:

 

  January 17, 2019 Award   January 16, 2020 Award 
  Awards
Granted

 

  (a) Adjusted for
Performance
Factor (TSR)
   Awards
Granted

 

  (b) Adjusted for
Performance
Factor (TSR)
 

Joe Bob Perkins

  79,496   198,740    55,255   138,138 

Matthew J. Meloy

  36,550   91,375    85,953   214,883 

Jennifer R. Kneale

  19,493   48,733    28,242   70,605 

Patrick J. McDonie

  19,798   49,495    20,951   52,378 

D. Scott Pryor

  19,798   49,495    20,951   52,378 

Robert M. Muraro

  19,798   49,495    20,951   52,378 

   
 

 

January 20, 2022 Award  January 19, 2023 Award  
     
 

 

Awards  
Granted  
(a) Adjusted for  
Performance  
Factor (TSR)  
Awards  
Granted  

(b) Adjusted for  
Performance  

Factor (TSR)  

     

Matthew J. Meloy

64,748  161,870  53,562  133,905  
     

Jennifer R. Kneale

24,281  60,703  19,423  48,558  
     

Patrick J. McDonie

15,782  39,455  13,586  33,965  
     

D. Scott Pryor

15,782  39,455  13,586  33,965  
    

Robert M. Muraro

15,782  39,455  13,586  33,965  

 

 (a)

Reflects the target number of performance share units granted to the named executive officers on January 17, 201920, 2022 multiplied by a performance percentage of 250%, which in accordance with SEC rules is the next higher performance level under the award that exceeds 20202023 performance. Vesting of these awards is contingent upon continuous employment or the satisfaction of certain other service-related conditions upon the executive’s retirement, in either case, through the end of the performance period, which ends December 31, 2021,2024, and the Company’s performance over the applicable performance period measured against a peer group of companies. The underlying shares of stock are not issued until vesting levels have been determinedcertified by the Compensation Committee.

 

 (b)

Reflects the target number of performance share units granted to the named executive officers on January 16, 202019, 2023 multiplied by a performance percentage of 250%, which in accordance with SEC rules is the next higher performance level under the award that exceeds 20202023 performance. Vesting of these awards is contingent upon continuous employment or the satisfaction of certain other service-related conditions upon the executive’s retirement, in either case, through the end of the performance period, which ends December 31, 2022,2025, and the Company’s performance over the applicable performance period measured against a peer group of companies. The underlying shares of stock are not issued until vesting levels have been determinedcertified by the Compensation Committee.

The treatment of the outstanding performance share unit awards upon certain terminations of employment (including retirement) or the occurrence of a change in control is described below under “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

 

(4)

The dollar amounts shown are determined by multiplying the number of shares of performance share units reported in the table by the closing price of a share of our common stock on December 31, 202029, 2023 ($26.38)86.87), which was the last trading day of fiscal 2020.year 2023. The amounts do not include any related dividends accrued with respect to the awards.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S48


Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 20202023

The following table provides the amount realized during 20202023 by each named executive officer upon the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units. None of our named executive officers exercised any option awards during the 20202023 year and, currently, there are no options outstanding under any of our plans.

 

  Stock Awards 

Name

 Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
  Value Realized on
Vesting (1)

($)
 

Joe Bob Perkins

  64,309  $2,586,513 

Matthew J. Meloy

  26,801   1,067,424 

Jennifer R. Kneale

  12,800   362,050 

Patrick J. McDonie

  17,854   713,836 

D. Scott Pryor

  17,722   709,560 

Robert M. Muraro

  42,474   1,188,928 

  
 

 

Stock Awards
   
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
Value Realized
on Vesting
 (1)
($)
   

Matthew J. Meloy

320,836$ 24,082,346
   

Jennifer R. Kneale

110,847  8,323,563
   

Patrick J. McDonie

91,329  6,863,126
   

D. Scott Pryor

91,329  6,863,126
   

Robert M. Muraro

97,329  7,317,086

 

(1)

Computed with respect to the restricted stock unit awards granted under our Stock Incentive Plan by multiplying the number of shares of stock vesting by the closing price of a share of common stock on the January 6, 202016, 2023 vesting date

39


($41.86)75.40), the January 20, 202019, 2023 vesting date ($41.28), February 28, 202074.87) and the January 20, 2023 vesting date ($32.40), the July 23, 2020 vesting date ($19.05) and the August 1, 2020 vesting date ($18.28)75.66) and does not include associated dividends accrued during the vesting period.

Pension Benefits

Other than our 401(k) plan, we do not have any plan that provides for payments or other benefits at, following, or in connection with, retirement.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

We do not have any plan that provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax qualified.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Aggregate Payments

The table below reflects the aggregate amount of payments and benefits that we believeestimate our named executive officers would have received under the Change in Control Program (described below) and Stock Incentive Plan upon certain specified termination of employment and/or a change in control events, in each case, had such event occurred on December 31, 2020.2023. Details regarding individual plans and arrangements follow the table. The amounts below constitute estimates of the amounts that would be paid to our named executive officers upon each designated event, and do not include any amounts accrued through 2023 fiscal 2020 year-end that would be paid in the normal course of continued employment, such as accrued but unpaid salary and benefits generally available to all salaried employees. The actual amounts to be paid are dependent on various factors, which may or may not exist at the time a named executive officer is actually terminated and/or a change in control actually occurs. Therefore, such amounts and disclosures should be considered “forward-looking statements.”

 

    

Name

 Change in
Control (No
  Termination)  
 Qualifying
  Termination  
Following

Change in
Control
 Termination by
 us without Cause 
   Termination for  
Death or

Disability
Change in Control
(No Termination)
Change in Control
(No Termination)
Qualifying
Termination
Following
Change in Control
Qualifying
Termination
Following
Change in Control
Termination by
us without Cause
Termination by
us without Cause
Termination for
Death or
Disability
Termination for
Death or
Disability

Joe Bob Perkins

  $ 13,696,619    $25,125,587        $20,019,361  
 

Matthew J. Meloy

  7,489,504   21,920,407      13,987,252 $ 82,518,716$ 82,518,716$ 74,367,479$ 74,367,479
 

Jennifer R. Kneale

  3,691,635   9,276,632      5,826,632   30,227,772  30,227,772  25,941,522  25,941,522
 

Patrick J. McDonie

  4,519,662   9,316,054      6,103,492   21,996,636  21,996,636  18,290,757  18,290,757
 

D. Scott Pryor

  4,519,662   9,304,432      6,103,492   21,999,372  21,999,372  18,290,757  18,290,757
   

Robert M. Muraro

  5,047,318   9,839,304      6,631,149   22,005,744  22,005,744  18,290,757  18,290,757

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S49


Executive Officer Change in Control Severance Program

We adopted the Change in Control Program on and effective as of January 12, 2012, and amended in 2015. Each of our named executive officers was an eligible participant in the Change in Control Program during the 20202023 calendar year.

The Change in Control Program is administered by our Senior Vice President—Human Resources. The Change in Control Program provides that if, in connection with or within 18 months after a “Change in Control,” a participant suffers a “Qualifying Termination,” then the individual will receive a severance payment, paid in a single lump sum cash payment within 60 days following the date of termination, equal to three times (i) the participant’s annual salary as of the date of the Change in Control or the date of termination, whichever is greater, and (ii) the amount of the participant’s annual salary multiplied by the participant’s most recent “target”

40


bonus percentage specified by the Compensation Committee prior to the Change in Control. In addition, the participant (and his or her eligible dependents, as applicable) will receive the continuation of their medical and dental benefits until the earlier to occur of (a) three years from the date of termination, or (b) the date the participant becomes eligible for coverage under another employer’s plan.

For purposes of the Change in Control Program, the following terms will generally have the meanings set forth below:

Cause means discharge of the participant by us on the following grounds: (i) the participant’s gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of his duties, (ii) the participant’s conviction of a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude, (iii) the participant’s willful refusal, after 15 days’ written notice, to perform his material lawful duties or responsibilities, (iv) the participant’s willful and material breach of any corporate policy or code of conduct, or (v) the participant’s willfully engaging in conduct that is known or should be known to be materially injurious to us or our subsidiaries.

Cause means discharge of the participant by us on the following grounds: (i) the participant’s gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of his or her duties, (ii) the participant’s conviction of a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude, (iii) the participant’s willful refusal, after 15 days’ written notice, to perform his or her material lawful duties or responsibilities, (iv) the participant’s willful and material breach of any corporate policy or code of conduct, or (v) the participant’s willfully engaging in conduct that is known or should be known to be materially injurious to us or our subsidiaries.

Change in Control means any of the following events: (i) any person (other than the Partnership) becomes the beneficial owner of more than 20% of the voting interest in us or in the General Partner, (ii) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or the General Partner (other than to the Partnership or its affiliates), (iii) a transaction resulting in a person other than Targa Resources GP LLC or an affiliate being the General Partner of the Partnership, (iv) the consummation of any merger, consolidation or reorganization involving us or the General Partner in which less than 51% of the total voting power of outstanding stock of the surviving or resulting entity is beneficially owned by the stockholders of the Company or the General Partner, immediately prior to the consummation of the transaction, or (v) a majority of the members of the Board of Directors or the board of directors of the General Partner is replaced during any 12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the applicable Board of Directors before the date of the appointment or election.

Change in Control means any of the following events: (i) any person (other than the Partnership) becomes the beneficial owner of more than 20% of the voting interest in us or in the General Partner, (ii) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or the General Partner (other than to the Partnership or its affiliates), (iii) a transaction resulting in a person other than Targa Resources GP LLC or an affiliate being the General Partner of the Partnership, (iv) the consummation of any merger, consolidation or reorganization involving us or the General Partner in which less than 51% of the total voting power of outstanding stock of the surviving or resulting entity is beneficially owned by the stockholders of the Company or the General Partner, immediately prior to the consummation of the transaction, or (v) a majority of the members of the Board of Directors or the board of directors of the General Partner is replaced during any 12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the applicable Board of Directors before the date of the appointment or election.

Good Reason means: (i) a material reduction in the participant’s authority, duties or responsibilities, (ii) a material reduction in the participant’s base compensation, or (iii) a material change in the geographical location at which the participant must perform services. The individual must provide notice to us of the alleged Good Reason event within 90 days of its occurrence and we have the opportunity to remedy the alleged Good Reason event within 30 days from receipt of the notice of such allegation.

Good Reason means: (i) a material reduction in the participant’s authority, duties or responsibilities, (ii) a material reduction in the participant’s base compensation, or (iii) a material change in the geographical location at which the participant must perform services. The individual must provide notice to us of the alleged Good Reason event within 90 days of its occurrence and we have the opportunity to remedy the alleged Good Reason event within 30 days from receipt of the notice of such allegation.

Qualifying Termination

Qualifying Termination means (i) an involuntary termination of the individual’s employment by us without Cause or (ii) a voluntary resignation of the individual’s employment for Good Reason.

All payments due under the Change in Control Program will be conditioned on the execution and non-revocation of a release for our benefit and the benefit of our related entities and agents. The Change in Control Program will supersede any other severance program for eligible participants in the event of a Change in Control, but will not affect accelerated vesting of any equity awards under the terms of the plans governing such awards.

If amounts payable to a named executive officer under the Change in Control Program, together with any other amounts that are payable by us as a result of a Change in Control (collectively, the “Payments”), exceed the amount allowed under section 280G of the Code for such individual, thereby subjecting the individual to an excise tax under section 4999 of the Code, then, depending on which method produces the largest net after-tax benefit for the recipient, the Payments shall either be: (i) reduced to the level at which no excise tax applies or (ii) paid in full, which would subject the individual to the excise tax.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S50

41


The following table reflects payments that would have been made to each of the named executive officers under the Change in Control Program in the event there was a Change in Control and the officer incurred a Qualifying Termination, in each case as of December 31, 2020.2023.

 

Name

Qualifying
Termination
Following
Change in
            Control (1)

 

Joe Bob Perkins

Name
  Qualifying Termination Following        
$5,106,226 

Matthew J. Meloy

  $ 8,151,237
7,933,155 

Jennifer R. Kneale

    4,286,250
3,450,000 

Patrick J. McDonie

    3,705,879
3,212,562 

D. Scott Pryor

    3,708,615
3,200,940 

Robert M. Muraro

    3,208,1553,714,987

 

(1)

Includes 3 years’ worth of continued participation in our medical and dental plans, calculated based on the monthly employer-paid portion of the premiums for our medical and dental plans as of December 31, 20202023 for each named executive officer and the officer’s eligible dependents in the following amounts: (a) Mr. Perkins – $14,575, (b) Mr. Meloy – $19,385,$24,987, (b) Ms. Kneale – $0, (c) Ms. Kneale–0, (d) Mr. McDonie – $20,854, (e)$15,879, (d) Mr. Pryor – $16,980,$18,615, and (f)(e) Mr. Muraro—$19,385.24,987.

Stock Incentive Plan

Our named executive officers held outstanding restricted stock units under our form of restricted stock unit agreement (the “Stock Agreement”), and performance share units under our form of performance share unit agreement (the “Performance Agreement”) and the Stock Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2020.2023. The terms applicable to certain Change in Control vesting scenarios within the outstanding Performance Agreements were amended in 2021 in order to bring their terms more in line with practices at our peer group, and the description below reflects those amendments. If a “Change in Control” occurs and the named executive officer has (i) remained continuously employed by us from the date of grant to the date upon which such Change in Control occurs and their employment was terminated by us without Cause or they terminated their employment for Good Reason, in either case within the 18 month24-month period following a Change in Control, (a “Change in Control Termination”) or (ii) retired following the date of grant and either performed consulting services for us or refrained from working for one of our competitors or in a similar role for another company (however, directorships at non-competitors are permitted), through the date of the Change in Control, then, (a) the restricted stock units granted to the officer under the Stock Agreement, and related dividends then credited to the officer, will fully vest on the date upon which such Change in Control Termination occurs with respect to clause (i) above or the Change in Control occurs with respect to clause (ii) above, and (b) the performance share units granted to the officer under the Performance Agreement and related dividends credited to the officer will vest based on a performance factorthe greater of 100% and the actual guideline percentage determined by the Compensation Committee as of the date such Change in Control Termination occurs with respect to clause (i) above or the Change in Control occurs with respect to clause (ii) above. occurs.

The Performance Agreements governing awards granted in 20202023 have a performance period of January 1, 20202023 through December 31, 2022.2025, while the Performance Agreements governing awards granted in 2022 have a performance period of January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024 and the Performance Agreements governing awards granted in 2021 have a performance period of January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023. Upon a Change in Control, the Compensation Committee will take into account the performance level achieved for the applicable performance period using a deemed performance percentage of the greater of 100%. The and the actual guideline percentage. With respect to all outstanding Performance Agreements, the average performance percentage may then be decreased or increased by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. The Performance Agreements governing awards granteddiscretion in 2018 and 2019 have four separate performance periods: (1) the first calendar year of the three-year performance period, (2) the second calendar year of the three-year performance period, (3) the third calendar year of the three-year performance period, and (4) the entirety of the performance period for the full three calendar years. Upon a Change in Control,order to reflect any factors the Compensation Committee will take into accountdeems relevant to properly reflect the average of the performance level achieved for each of the four performance periods, using the actual performance level achieved with respect to any completed period, and a deemed performance percentage of 100% for any performance period that has not been completed. The average percentage may then be decreased or increased by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.event.

Restricted stock units and performance share units granted to a named executive officer under the Stock Agreement and Performance Agreement, and related dividends then credited to the officer, will also fully vest if

42


the named executive officer’s employment is terminated by reason of death or a “Disability” (as defined below). If a named executive officer’s employment with us is terminated for any reason other than death, Disability or a Change in Control Termination, then the officer’s unvested restricted stock units and performance share units are forfeited to us for no consideration, except that (other than with respect to retention grants for Mr. Perkins, Mr. Meloy, Ms. Kneale, Mr. McDonie, Mr. Pryor and Mr. Muraro), if a named executive officer retires, the officer’s awards will continue to vest on the original vesting schedule (unless a Change in Control occurs as described above) if, from the date of the officer’s retirement or termination through the applicable vesting date, the named executive officer has either performed consulting services for us or refrained from working for one of our competitors or in a similar role for another company (however, directorships at non-competitors are permitted).

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S51


The following terms generally have the following meanings for purposes of the Stock Incentive Plan, Stock Agreements and Performance Agreements:

Affiliate means an entity or organization which, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, us.

Affiliate means an entity or organization which, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, us.

Change in Control means the occurrence of one of the following events: (i) any person or group acquires or gains ownership or control (including, without limitation, the power to vote), by way of merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reorganization or otherwise, of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of our voting stock or more than 50% of the combined voting power of the equity interests in the Partnership or the General Partner, (ii) any person, including a group as contemplated by section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, acquires in any twelve-month period (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) ownership, directly or indirectly, of 30% or more of the outstanding shares of our voting stock or of the combined voting power of the equity interests in the Partnership or the General Partner, (iii) the completion of a liquidation or dissolution of us or the approval by the limited partners of the Partnership, in one or a series of transactions, of a plan of complete liquidation of the Partnership, (iv) the sale or other disposition by us of all or substantially all of our assets in one or more transactions to any person other than an Affiliate, (v) the sale or disposition by either the Partnership or the General Partner of all or substantially all of its assets in one or more transactions to any person other than to an Affiliate, (vi) a transaction resulting in a person other than Targa Resources GP LLC or an Affiliate being the General Partner of the Partnership, or (vii) as a result of or in connection with a contested election of directors, the persons who were our directors before such election shall cease to constitute a majority of our Board of Directors.

Change in Control means the occurrence of one of the following events: (i) any person or group acquires or gains ownership or control (including, without limitation, the power to vote), by way of merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reorganization or otherwise, of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of our voting stock or more than 50% of the combined voting power of the equity interests in the Partnership or the General Partner, (ii) any person, including a group as contemplated by section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, acquires in any twelve-month period (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) ownership, directly or indirectly, of 30% or more of the outstanding shares of our voting stock or of the combined voting power of the equity interests in the Partnership or the General Partner, (iii) the completion of a liquidation or dissolution of us or the approval by the limited partners of the Partnership, in one or a series of transactions, of a plan of complete liquidation of the Partnership, (iv) the sale or other disposition by us of all or substantially all of our assets in one or more transactions to any person other than an Affiliate, (v) the sale or disposition by either the Partnership or the General Partner of all or substantially all of its assets in one or more transactions to any person other than to an Affiliate, (vi) a transaction resulting in a person other than Targa Resources GP LLC or an Affiliate being the General Partner of the Partnership, or (vii) as a result of or in connection with a contested election of directors, the persons who were our directors before such election shall cease to constitute a majority of our Board of Directors.

Disability

Disability means a disability that entitles the named executive officer to disability benefits under our long-term disability plan.

The following table reflects amounts that would have been received by each of the named executive officers under the Stock Incentive Plan and related Stock Agreements and Performance Agreements in the event there was a Change in Control or a Change in Control Termination or their employment was terminated due to death or Disability, each as of December 31, 2020.2023. The amounts reported below assume that the price per share of our common stock was $26.38,$86.87, which was the closing price per share of our common stock on December 31, 202029, 2023 (the last trading day of fiscal 2020)year 2023). No amounts are reported assuming retirement as of December 31, 2020,2023, since additional conditions must be met following a named executive officer’s retirement in order for any restricted stock awards or restricted stock units to become vested.

 

Name

 Change in
Control
  Change in
Control
Termination
       Termination for Death  
  or Disability  
 

Joe Bob Perkins (1)

     $ 13,696,619      $20,019,361      $ 20,019,361 

Matthew J. Meloy (2)

  7,489,504   13,987,252      13,987,252 

Jennifer R. Kneale (3)

  3,691,635   5,826,632      5,826,632 

Patrick J. McDonie (4)

  4,519,662   6,103,492      6,103,492 

D. Scott Pryor (5)

  4,519,662   6,103,492      6,103,492 

Robert M. Muraro (6)

  5,047,318   6,631,149      6,631,149 
    

Name

  Change in   
Control   
  Change in Control   
Termination   
  Termination for Death   
or Disability   
    

Matthew J. Meloy (1)

    $ 74,367,479  $ 74,367,479
    

Jennifer R. Kneale (2)

      25,941,522    25,941,522
    

Patrick J. McDonie (3)

      18,290,757    18,290,757
    

D. Scott Pryor (4)

      18,290,757    18,290,757
    

Robert M. Muraro (5)

      18,290,757    18,290,757

 

43


(1)

(a) Of the amount reported under each of the “Change in Control” column, “Change in Control Termination” column and the “Termination for Death or Disability” column:

(i) $1,239,517, and $398,920, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;

(i)

$10,334,663, and $255,779, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2021, which are scheduled to vest January 19, 2024;

(ii) $1,209,022 and $0, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, in settlement of an award under the 2017 Bonus Plan, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;

(ii)

$25,836,702, and $1,085,576, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2021, which have a performance period that ended on December 31, 2023 (using an estimate of a 250% payout);

(iii) $2,144,377, and $690,135, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which have an aggregate performance period that will end on December 31, 2020; however, the awards deemed “earned” were still deemed to be outstanding as of December 31, 2020, therefore a Change in Control or termination due to death or Disability could accelerate the time at which the awards could be settled with the executive;

(iii)

$5,624,659, and $90,647, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 20, 2022, which are scheduled to vest January 20, 2025;

(iv) $2,097,104, and $385,556, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2022;

(iv)

$14,061,647, and $526,078, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 20, 2022, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2024 (using an estimate of a 250% payout);

(v) $1,857,653, and $0, respectively, relate to the restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, in settlement of an award under the 2018 Bonus Plan, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2022; and

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S52

(vi) $3,103,713, and $570,622, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, which have an aggregate performance period that will end on December 31, 2021.


(v)

$4,652,931, and $18,747, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2023, which are scheduled to vest January 19, 2026; and

(b)

(vi)

$11,632,327, and $247,724, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2023, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2025 (using an estimate of a 250% payout).

(2)

Of the amount reported under each of the “Change in Control Termination” column and the “Termination for Death or Disability” column:

(i) $1,457,627, and $66,859 respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 16, 2020, which are scheduled to vest January 16, 2023;

(ii) $2,145,644, and $0, respectively, relate to the restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 16, 2020, in settlement of an award under the 2019 Bonus Plan, which are scheduled to vest January 16, 2023; and

(iii) $2,536,279, and $116,333, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 16, 2020, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2022.

(2)

(a) Of the amount reported under each of the “Change in Control” column, “Change in Control Termination” column and the “Termination for Death or Disability” column:

(i) $1,319,000, and $606,500, respectively, relate to restricted stock units awarded January 20, 2017 as a retention grant which vest (A) 30% on January 20, 2021, (B) 30% on January 20, 2022 and (C) 40% on January 20, 2023, contingent upon continuous employment;

(i)

$3,395,661, and $84,041, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2021, which are scheduled to vest January 19, 2024;

(ii) $695,984, and $223,992, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;

(ii)

$8,489,197, and $356,689, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2021, which have a performance period that ended on December 31, 2023 (using an estimate of a 250% payout);

(iii) $221,645, and $0, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, in settlement of an award under the 2017 Bonus Plan, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;

(iii)

$2,109,290, and $33, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 20, 2022, which are scheduled to vest January 20, 2025;

(iv) $1,204,062, and $387,509, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which have an aggregate performance period that will end on December 31, 2020; however, the awards deemed “earned” were still deemed to be outstanding as of December 31, 2020, therefore a Change in Control or termination due to death or Disability could accelerate the time at which the awards could be settled with the executive;

(iv)

$5,273,226, and $197,283, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 20, 2022, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2024 (using an estimate of a 250% payout);

(v) $964,189, and $177,268, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2022; and

(v)

$1,687,276, and $6,798, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2023, which are scheduled to vest January 19, 2026; and

(vi) $1,427,000, and $262,356, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, which have an aggregate performance period that will end on December 31, 2021.

(vi)

$4,218,233, and $89,832, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2023, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2025 (using an estimate of a 250% payout).

(b)

(3)

Of the amount reported under each of the “Change in Control Termination” column and the “Termination for Death or Disability” column:

(i) $2,267,440, and $104,003, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 16, 2020, which are scheduled to vest January 16, 2023; and

44


(ii) $3,945,340, and $180,965, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 16, 2020, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2022.

(3)

(a) Of the amount reported under each of the “Change in Control” column, “Change in Control Termination” column and the “Termination for Death or Disability” column:

(i) $131,900, and $78,850, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 6, 2016, which are scheduled to vest on January 6, 2021;

(i)

$2,519,056, and $62,346, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2021, which are scheduled to vest January 19, 2024;

(ii) $791,400, and $363,900, respectively, relate to restricted stock units awarded January 20, 2017 as a retention grant which vest (A) 30% on January 20, 2021, (B) 30% on January 20, 2022 and (C) 40% on January 20, 2023, contingent upon continuous employment;

(ii)

$6,297,641 and $264,607, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2021, which have a performance period that ended on December 31, 2023 (using an estimate of a 250% payout);

(iii) $208,798, and $67,198, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;

(iii)

$1,370,982, and $22,095, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 20, 2022, which are scheduled to vest January 20, 2025;

(iv) $62,362, and $0, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, in partial settlement of an award under the 2017 Bonus Plan which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;

(iv)

$3,427,456, and $128,229, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 20, 2022, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2024 (using an estimate of a 250% payout);

(v) $361,221, and $116,254, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which have an aggregate performance period that will end on December 31, 2020; however, the awards deemed “earned” were still deemed to be outstanding as of December 31, 2020, therefore a Change in Control or termination due to death or Disability could accelerate the time at which the awards could be settled with the executive;

(v)

$1,180,216, and $4,755, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2023, which are scheduled to vest January 19, 2026; and

(vi) $514,225, and $94,541, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2022; and

(vi)

$2,950,540, and $62,835, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2023, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2025 (using an estimate of a 250% payout).

(vii) $761,063, and $139,923, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, December 31, 2021.

(b)
(4)

Of the amount reported under each of the “Change in Control Termination” column and the “Termination for Death or Disability” column:

(i) $745,024, and $34,173, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 16, 2020, which are scheduled to vest January 16, 2023; and

(ii) $1,296,340, and $59,460, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 16, 2020, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2022.

(4)

(a) Of the amount reported under each of the “Change in Control” column, “Change in Control Termination” column and the “Termination for Death or Disability” column:

(i) $1,187,100, and $545,850, respectively, relate to restricted stock units awarded January 20, 2017 as a retention grant which vest (A) 30% on January 20, 2021, (B) 30% on January 20, 2022 and (C) 40% on January 20, 2023, contingent upon continuous employment;

(ii) $314,845, and $101,329, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;

(iii) $117,180, and $0, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, in partial settlement of an award under the 2017 Bonus Plan, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;

(iv) $544,694, and $175,302, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which have an aggregate performance period that will end on December 31, 2020; however, the awards deemed “earned” were still deemed to be outstanding as of December 31, 2020, therefore a Change in Control or termination due to death or Disability could accelerate the time at which the awards could be settled with the executive;

(v) $522,271, and $96,020, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2022; and

(vi) $772,960, and $142,110, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, which have an aggregate performance period that will end on December 31, 2021.
(i)

$2,519,056, and $62,346, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2021, which are scheduled to vest January 19, 2024;

 

(ii)

$6,297,641, and $264,607, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2021, which have a performance period that ended on December 31, 2023 (using an estimate of a 250% payout);

45

(iii)

$1,370,982, and $22,095, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 20, 2022, which are scheduled to vest January 20, 2025;

(iv)

$3,427,456, and $128,229, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 20, 2022, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2024 (using an estimate of a 250% payout);

(v)

$1,180,216, and $4,755, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2023, which are scheduled to vest January 19, 2026; and

(vi)

$2,950,540, and $62,835, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2023, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2025 (using an estimate of a 250% payout).

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S53


(b)

(5)

Of the amount reported under each of the “Change in Control Termination” column and the “Termination for Death or Disability” column:

(i) $552,687, and $25,351, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 16, 2020, which are scheduled to vest January 16, 2023; and

(ii) $961,683, and $44,111, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 16, 2020, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2022.

(5)

(a) Of the amount reported under each of the “Change in Control” column, “Change in Control Termination” column and the “Termination for Death or Disability” column:

(i) $1,187,100, and $545,850, respectively, relate to restricted stock units awarded January 20, 2017 as a retention grant which vest (A) 30% on January 20, 2021, (B) 30% on January 20, 2022 and (C) 40% on January 20, 2023, contingent upon continuous employment;

(ii) $314,845, and $101,329, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;

(iii) $117,180, and $0, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, in partial settlement of an award under the 2017 Bonus Plan, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;

(iv) $544,694, and $175,302, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which have an aggregate performance period that will end on December 31, 2020; however, the awards deemed “earned” were still deemed to be outstanding as of December 31, 2020, therefore a Change in Control or termination due to death or Disability could accelerate the time at which the awards could be settled with the executive;

(v) $522,271, and $96,020, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2022; and

(vi) $772,960, and $142,110, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, which have an aggregate performance period that will end on December 31, 2021.

(b) Of the amount reported under each of the “Change in Control Termination” column and the “Termination for Death or Disability” column:

(i) $552,687, and $25,351, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 16, 2020, which are scheduled to vest January 16, 2023; and

(ii) $961,683, and $44,111, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 16, 2020, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2022.

 

 (6)(i)

(a) Of the amount reported under each of the “Change in Control” column, “Change in Control Termination” column$2,519,056, and the “Termination for Death or Disability” column:$62,346, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2021, which are scheduled to vest January 19, 2024;

(i) $1,582,800, and $727,800, respectively, relate to restricted stock units awarded January 20, 2017 as a retention grant which vest (A) 30% on January 20, 2021, (B) 30% on January 20, 2022 and (C) 40% on January 20, 2023, contingent upon continuous employment;

(ii) $298,279, and $95,991, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;

(iii) $89,085, and $0, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, in partial settlement of an award under the 2017 Bonus Plan, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;

(iv) $544,694, and $175,302, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which have an aggregate performance period that will end on December 31, 2020; however, the awards deemed “earned” were still deemed to be outstanding as of December 31, 2020, therefore a Change in Control or termination due to death or Disability could accelerate the time at which the awards could be settled with the executive;

(v) $522,271, and $96,020, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2022;
(ii)

$6,297,641, and $264,607, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2021, which have a performance period that ended on December 31, 2023 (using an estimate of a 250% payout);

 

(iii)

$1,370,982, and $22,095, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 20, 2022, which are scheduled to vest January 20, 2025;

46

(iv)

$3,427,456, and $128,229, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 20, 2022, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2024 (using an estimate of a 250% payout);

(v)

$1,180,216, and $4,755, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2023, which are scheduled to vest January 19, 2026; and

(vi)

$2,950,540, and $62,835 respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2023, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2025 (using an estimate of a 250% payout).

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S54


(vi) $772,960, and $142,110, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, which have an aggregate performance period that will end on December 31, 2021.

(b) Of the amount reported under each of the “Change in Control Termination” column and the “Termination for Death or Disability” column:

(i) $552,687, and $25,351, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 16, 2020, which are scheduled to vest January 16, 2023; and

(ii) $961,683, and $44,111, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 16, 2020, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2022.

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth the compensation earned by our non-employee directors for 2020:2023:

 

Name

 

Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash

   Stock Awards (1)    Total Compensation  

Charles R. Crisp

  $                147,250   $  152,481   $  299,731 

Ershel C. Redd Jr.

  109,250   152,481   261,731 

Chris Tong

  109,250   152,481   261,731 

Laura C. Fulton

  133,000   152,481   285,481 

Waters S. Davis, IV

  128,250   152,481   280,731 

Rene R. Joyce

  109,250   152,481   261,731 

Robert B. Evans

  123,500   152,481   275,981 

Beth A. Bowman

  109,250   152,481   261,731 

James W. Whalen

  80,500      80,500 

Lindsey M. Cooksen (2)

  63,250   40,552   103,802 

    
Name  Fees Earned or Paid in Cash    Stock Awards (1)    Total Compensation  
    

Paul W. Chung

  $ 210,000    $ 246,927    $ 456,927  
    

Joe Bob Perkins

    115,000      166,274      281,274  
    

Charles R. Crisp

    118,750      166,274      285,024  
    

Ershel C. Redd Jr.

    115,000      166,274      281,274  
    

Laura C. Fulton

    140,000      166,274      306,274  
    

Waters S. Davis, IV

    131,250      166,274      297,524  
    

Rene R. Joyce

    115,000      166,274      281,274  
    

Robert B. Evans

    130,000      166,274      296,274  
    

Beth A. Bowman

    130,000      166,274      296,274  
    

Lindsey M. Cooksen

    115,000      166,274      281,274  

 

(1)

Amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted shares of our common stock with a one-year vesting period awarded to the non-employee directors under our Stock Incentive Plan, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, disregarding the estimate of forfeitures. For a discussion of the assumptions and methodologies used to value the awards reported in this column, see the discussion contained in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements at Note 2522 – Compensation Plans included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.2023. On January 16, 2020,19, 2023, each director serving at that time received 3,6842,243 restricted shares of our common stock, except for our Chairman of the Board who received 3,331 restricted shares of our common stock, in connection with their 20202023 service on our Board of Directors, and the grant date fair value of each share of common stock computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 was $41.39. On June 2, 2020, Ms. Cooksen, received 2,149 restricted shares of our common stock in connection with her 2020 service on our Board of Directors, and the grant date fair value of each share of common stock computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 was $18.87.$74.13. As of December 31, 2020,2023, each of the directors who received an award still held the outstanding restricted shares granted to them in 20202023 (which was equal to 3,6842,243 shares for everyone other than Ms. Cooksen,Mr. Chung, who held 2,1493,331 shares), and none of our non-employee directors helddid not hold any outstanding stock options.

(2)

Ms. Cooksen was appointed, effective June 1, 2020.

Narrative to Director Compensation Table

For 2020,2023, the annual cash retainer for all non-employee directors was $115,000. The additional annual retainers for (i) eachthe Chairman of the lead director andBoard was $80,000, (ii) the Chairman of the Audit Committee was $25,000, (ii) the Chairman of the Compensation Committee was $20,000 and (iii) each of the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee, and the Chairman of the Risk Management Committee and the Chairman of the Sustainability Committee was $15,000. Due to temporary cost cutting measures, the retainers were temporarily reduced for the second and third quartersPayments of 2020. Payment of non-employee director retainers are made quarterly. All non-employee directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board of Director and committee meetings.

A director who is also an employee receives no additional compensation for services as a director. Accordingly, Messrs. Perkins andMr. Meloy havehas been omitted from the table. Because Messrs. Perkins andMr. Meloy areis a named executive officersofficer for 2020,2023, the Summary Compensation Table reflects the total compensation theyhe received for

47


services performed for us and our affiliates. Mr. Whalen retired from employment with the Company on March 1, 2020 and he received the annual cash retainer prorated for the portion of the year he was a non-employee director.

Director Long-term Equity Incentives.Incentives. We granted equity awards in January 20202023 to our non-employee directors serving at that time under the Stock Incentive Plan. Each of these directors received an award of 3,6842,243 restricted shares of our common stock, except for our Chairman of the Board who received 3,331 restricted shares of our common stock, with a one-year vesting period. These grants reflect our intent to provide our directors with a target value of approximately $150,000$165,000 in annual long-term incentive awards.awards, except for the grant to our Chairman of the Board which included an additional award with a target value of approximately $80,000. The awards are intended to align the long-term interests of our directors with those of our shareholders.

Changes for 20212024

Director Compensation. For 2021, the ChairmanCompensation. The Board of the Board will receive an additional equity portion of the annual retainer equalDirectors did not make any material changes to $80,000 and an annual cash retainer of $80,000 and the Chairman of the Sustainability Committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $15,000. In addition, the annual retainerour non-employee director compensation program for the lead director was eliminated.2024.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S55


Pay Ratio Disclosures

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Meloy, our Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”).

For 2020,2023, our last completed fiscal year:

 

The median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than the CEO) was $113,398,

The median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than the CEO) was $133,130.

 

The annual total compensation of Mr. Meloy was $12,102,596.

The annual total compensation of Mr. Meloy was $14,191,630.

 

Based on this information, for 2020 the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees (“CEO Pay Ratio”) was reasonably estimated to be 107 to 1.

Based on this information, for 2023 the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees (“CEO Pay Ratio”) was reasonably estimated to be 107 to 1.

To calculate the CEO Pay Ratio we must identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and our CEO. To these ends, we took the following steps:

 

We determined that, as of December 31, 2023, our employee population consisted of approximately 3,182 individuals. This population consisted of our full-time and part-time employees, as we do not have temporary or seasonal workers.

We used a consistently applied compensation measure to identify our median employee of comparing the amount of salary or wages, bonuses, company contributions under our 401(k) plan, and the grant date fair value of equity awards determined under FASB ASC Topic 718. We identified our median employee by consistently applying this compensation measure to all of our employees included in our analysis. For individuals hired after January 1, 2023 that were included in the employee population, we calculated these compensation elements on an annualized basis. We did not make any cost of living adjustments in identifying the median employee.

We combined all of the elements of the median employee’s compensation for the 2023 year in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $133,130.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S56


Pay Versus Performance
As required by Item 402(v) of December 31, 2020, our employee population consisted of approximately 2,372 individuals. This population consisted of our full-time and part-time employees, as we do not have temporary or seasonal workers.

Regulation
S-K,

We used a consistently applied compensation measure to identify our median employee of comparing the amount of salary or wages, bonuses, company contributions under our 401(k) plan, and the grant date fair value of equity awards determined under FASB ASC Topic 718. We identified our median employee by consistently applying this compensation measure to all of our employees included in our analysis. For individuals hired after January 1, 2020 that were included in the employee population, we calculated these compensation elements on an annualized basis. We did not make any cost of living adjustments in identifying the median employee.

We combined all of the elements of the median employee’s compensation for the 2020 year in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $113,398.

With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our 2020 Summary Compensation Table included in Item 11 of Part III of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

48


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board of Directors believes that sound governance practices and policies provide an important framework to assist it in fulfilling its duty to stockholders. The Company’s “Corporate Governance Guidelines” coverCompany is providing the following principal subjects:

Roleinformation regarding the relationship between executive compensation and functions of the Board of Directors

Qualifications and independence of directors

Size of the Board of Directors and director selection process

Committee functions

Meetings of non-employee directors

Self-evaluation

Ethics and conflicts of interest (a copy of the current “Code of Conduct” is posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance)

Compensation of the Board of Directors

Succession planning

Access to senior management and to independent advisors

New director orientation

Continuing education

The Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance. The Corporate Governance Guidelines will be reviewed periodically, and any proposed additions to or amendments of the Corporate Governance Guidelines will be presented to the Board of Directors for its approval.

The NYSE has adopted rules that require listed companies to adopt governance guidelines covering certain matters. The Company believes that the Corporate Governance Guidelines comply with the NYSE rules.

Board Leadership

Mr. Chung has served as Chairman of the Board of the Company’s Board of Directors since January 1, 2021 and served as Executive Vice President and Senior Legal Advisor of the Company between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020. Mr. Perkins served as Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company’s Board of Directors between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020 and served as Chief Executive Officer between January 1, 2012 and March 1, 2020. He has also served as a director of the Company since January 1, 2012. Mr. Whalen previously served as Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company’s Board of Directors between January 1, 2015 and March 1, 2020 and has served as a director of the Company since its formation in October 2005. Mr. Meloy has served as Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company since March 1, 2020. Our bylaws allow the same individual to hold the position of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors.

To ensure a strong and independent board, all directors of the Company, other than Messrs. Chung, Meloy, Perkins and Whalen, are independent. The non-management members of the Board of Directors regularly meet in

49


executive session without the presence of the CEO or other members of management. In addition, the independent members of the Board of Directors meet in executive session without the presence of the CEO or other members of management at least once annually. Mr. Chung is chair of meetings of the non-management directors and Mr. Crisp is chair of meetings of the independent directors.

In his capacity as chair of the meetings of non-management directors, Mr. Chung provides, in conjunction with the CEO, leadership and guidance to the Board of Directors. He also (i) establishes the agenda for each meeting of the non-management directors and (ii) provides the Board’s guidance and feedback to the CEO and the Company’s management team. All directors are encouraged to suggest the inclusion of agenda items or revisions to meeting materials, and any director is free to raise at any Board meeting items that are not on the agenda for that meeting.

Given the strong leadership of the Company’s CEO, the effective counterbalancing role of the Chairman and a Board comprised of strong and independent directors, the Board believes that, at the present time, the current structure of the Board best serves the interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Communications with the Board of Directors

Stockholders or other interested parties can contact any director (including Mr. Chung or Mr. Crisp), any committee of the Board of Directors, or our non-management directors as a group, by writing to them at Targa Resources Corp., 811 Louisiana Street, Suite 2100, Houston, Texas 77002, Attention: Secretary. Comments or complaints relating to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will also be referred to members of the Audit Committee. All such communications will be forwarded to the appropriate member(s) of the Board of Directors.

Director Independence

The Company’s standards for determining director independence require the assessment of directors’ independence each year. A director cannot be considered independent unless the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that he or she does not have any relationship with management or the Company that may interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment, including any of the relationships that would disqualify the director from being independent under the rules of the NYSE.

The Board of Directors has assessed the independence of each non-employee director and each nominee for director under the Company’s guidelines and the independence standards of the NYSE. The Board of Directors affirmatively determined that nine non-employee directors (Mses. Bowman, Cooksen and Fulton and Messrs. Crisp, Davis, Evans, Joyce, Redd and Tong) are independent.

Financial Literacy of Audit Committee and Designation of Financial Experts

The Board of Directors evaluated the members of the Audit Committee in December 2010 for financial literacy and the attributes of a financial expert as well as the Exchange Act independence requirements. The Board of Directors also evaluated new members of the Audit Committee in February 2013, March 2016, March 2019 and June 2020 for financial literacy. The Board of Directors determined that each of the Audit Committee members is financially literate and that the Chairman of the Audit Committee, Ms. Fulton, is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC.

50


Oversight of Risk Management

Except for the responsibilities of the Audit Committee discussed below, the Board of Directors as a whole (including the committees of the Board of Directors) oversees the assessment of major risks of the Company and the management of such risks. For example, the Board of Directors, including the committees of the Board of Directors:

reviews and approves the Company’s annual business plan and capital budget and reviews with management on at least a quarterly basis the Company’s financial performance including any variations fromfor each of the annual business planfour years in the period ended December 31, 2023. In accordance with the applicable SEC rules, the adjustments described and capital budget;

quantified below were made to the values reported in the Summary Compensation Table for each applicable year to determine the “actual” compensation paid to our Principal Executive Officers (“PEOs”) and the average “actual” compensation paid to our other Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”).

has established specific dollar limitsThe following table summarizes compensation values reported in the Summary Compensation Table for our PEO and the average for our other NEOs, as compared to “compensation actually paid” or “CAP” and the Company’s financial performance for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020:

          
 Year 
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for First
PEO
(1)
  
Compensation
Actually Paid
to First PEO
(1)
(2)
  
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Second
PEO
(1)
  
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Second
PEO
(1) (2)
  
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for
Non-PEO

NEOs
(1)
  
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to
Non-PEO

NEOs
(1) (2)
  
Value of Initial
Fixed $100
Investment Based
On:
  
Net
Income
(Loss)
(In
Millions)
  
Adjusted
EBITDA
(in
Millions)
 
 TSR  
Peer
Group
TSR
(3)
 
           
(a)   (b)    (c)    (b)    (c)    (d)    (e)    (f)    (g)    (h)    (i)  
           
 2023
  N/A   N/A  $14,191,630  $28,563,134  $4,581,109  $8,656,712  $234.84  $167.99  $1,579.3  $3,530.0 
           
 2022
  N/A   N/A  $15,202,542  $39,196,628  $4,719,589  $11,823,921  $194.07  $140.99  $1,531.4  $2,901.1 
           
 2021
  N/A   N/A  $14,691,940  $40,278,218  $4,364,561  $12,154,312  $135.07  $108.82  $422.1  $2,052.0 
           
 2020
 $11,213,260  $3,897,160  $12,102,596  $7,050,069  $3,598,338  $1,236,586  $67.48  $75.04  $(1,325.1 $1,636.6 
(1)
The first and second PEOs reflected in columns (b) and (c) represent Joe Bob Perkins and Matthew J. Meloy, respectively. Both men served as our PEO during periods of the 2020 year. The
non-PEO
NEOs reflected in columns (d) and (e) for each of 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 are as follows: Jennifer R. Kneale, Patrick J. McDonie, D. Scott Pryor and Robert M. Muraro.
(2)
The Company deducted from and added to the Summary Compensation Table total compensation as disclosed in the tables below to calculate compensation actually paid in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
as disclosed in columns (c) and (e) for the PEO and
Non-PEO
NEOs in 2023. As the Company’s NEOs do not participate in any defined benefit plans, no adjustments were required to amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table totals related to the value of benefits under such plans.
(3)
The peer group that we have used for purposes of this Pay Versus Performance section is the Alerian US Midstream Energy Index, which is the same index that we use for our stock performance graph each year within our Annual Report on Form
10-K.
        2023    
 Second PEO Summary Compensation Table Totals
  
$
14,191,630
 
 Add (Subtract):     
 Fair value of equity awards granted during the year from the Summary Compensation Table   (10,864,516
 Fair value at year end of equity awards granted during the year   13,580,645 
 Fair value of equity awards granted and vested during the year   - 
 Change in fair value of equity awards granted in prior years that were unvested as of the
 end of the year
   9,543,756 
 Change in fair value of equity awards granted in prior years that vested during the year   571,584 
 Equity awards granted in prior years that were forfeited during the year   - 
 Dividends or other earnings paid on equity awards during the year   1,540,032 
 Total Equity Award Related Adjustments   14,371,504 
 Compensation Actually Paid Totals
  
$
28,563,134
 
Targa Resources Corp.
|
Proxy Statement
|
2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S
57

       2023    
 Non-PEO
NEOs Summary
 Compensation Table Totals
  
$
4,581,109
 
 Add (Subtract):     
 Fair value of equity awards granted during the year from the Summary Compensation Table   (3,051,779
 Fair value at year end of equity awards granted during the year   3,814,723 
 Fair value of equity awards granted and vested during the year   - 
 Change in fair value of equity awards granted in prior years that were unvested as of the end of the year   2,573,840 
 Change in fair value of equity awards granted in prior years that vested during the year   151,447 
 Equity awards granted in prior years that were forfeited during the year   - 
 Dividends or other earnings paid on equity awards during the year   587,372 
 Total Equity Award Related Adjustments   4,075,603 
 Average Compensation Actually Paid Totals
  
$
8,656,712
 
The charts on the commitment authority of members of senior managementfollowing pages reflect that the PEOs’ and requires Board approvalother NEOs’ CAP align with the Company’s TSR and Peer Group TSR, Net Income, and Adjusted EBITDA over the four-year period presented in the tables. This is primarily because of the Company’s capital expenditures and investments exceeding that authority; and

monitorsuse of equity-based awards, which are tied directly to changes in the Company’s interest ratestock price. For fiscal year 2023, the Company targeted approximately 74% for the PEO and commodity hedging activities.

The Company’s Audit Committee is responsible63% for overseeing the Company’s assessment and management of financial reporting and internal control risks, as well as other risks such as the credit risks associated with counterparty exposure and our cybersecurity efforts and measures. Management and the Company’s external auditors report regularly to the Audit Committee on those subjects Given the strong leadershipNEOs of the Company’s CEO, the effective counterbalancing rolevalue of the Chairman and a Boardtotal compensation to be comprised of strongequity-based awards, divided 50% each between RSUs and independent directors,PSUs. Please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2023 Executive Compensation Program Snapshot—Pay Mix” for further detail regarding the Board believestotal direct compensation.

LOGO
Targa Resources Corp.
|
Proxy Statement
|
2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S
58

LOGO
LOGO
Most Important Performance Measures for Fiscal Year 2023
The measures listed below represent the most important financial performance measures that at the present time, the current structurewe used to determine CAP for fiscal year 2023 as further described in our CD&A.
Most Important Financial Performance Measures
Adjusted EBITDA
Distributable Cash Flow per Share
Relative TSR
Targa Resources Corp.
|
Proxy Statement
|
2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S
59


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 29, 202119, 2024 (unless otherwise indicated) held by:

each person who beneficially owns more than 5% of our then outstanding shares of common stock;

each person who beneficially owns more than 5% of our then outstanding shares of common stock;

each of our named executive officers;

each of our named executive officers;

each of our directors; and

each of our directors; and

all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

The Company owns all of the outstanding Partnership common units of the Partnership. As of March 29, 2021, none of our directors or executive officers owned any Series A Preferred Stock of the Company.

all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC. In general, these rules attribute beneficial ownership of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power and/or investment power with respect to those securities and include, among other things, securities that an individual has the right to acquire within 60 days. Unless otherwise indicated, the stockholders identified in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all securities shown as beneficially owned by them. Percentage ownership calculations for any security holder listed in the table below are based on 228,654,590222,535,258 shares of our common stock outstanding on March 29, 2021.

          Targa Resources Corp.         

Name of Beneficial Owner (1)

 Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
   Percentage of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned

The Vanguard Group (2)

  23,264,742    10.17%  

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (3)

  17,250,268    7.54% 

Joe Bob Perkins (4)

  940,667    * 

Matthew J. Meloy

  120,980    * 

Jennifer R. Kneale

  37,541    * 

Patrick J. McDonie

  108,556    * 

D. Scott Pryor

  81,743    * 

Robert M. Muraro

  70,245    * 

Paul W. Chung (5)

  560,717    * 

Rene R. Joyce (6)

  866,507    * 

James W. Whalen (7)

  603,700    * 

Charles R. Crisp

  122,807    * 

Chris Tong (8)

  96,913    * 

Robert B. Evans (9)

  89,190    * 

Ershel C. Redd Jr.

  23,646    * 

Laura C. Fulton

  18,679    * 

Waters S. Davis, IV

  15,963    * 

Beth A. Bowman

  8,823    * 

Lindsey M. Cooksen

  0    * 

All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons)

  3,859,817    1.69% 

19, 2024.
  
    Targa Resources Corp.
   
 Name of Beneficial Owner
(1)
 Common Stock
   Beneficially Owned   
 Percentage of
Common Stock
   Beneficially Owned   
   
The Vanguard Group
(2)
 26,814,175 12.02%
   
BlackRock, Inc.
(3)
 20,030,896 8.98%
   
State Street Corporation
(4)
 14,542,581 6.52%
   
Joe Bob Perkins
(5)
    350,585 *
   
Matthew J. Meloy
    530,151 *
   
Jennifer R. Kneale
    166,438 *
   
Patrick J. McDonie
    248,784 *
   
D. Scott Pryor
(6)
    156,098 *
   
Robert M. Muraro
    177,621 *
   
Paul W. Chung
(7)
    546,424 *
   
Rene R. Joyce
(8)
    783,083 *
   
Charles R. Crisp
    100,524 *
   
Ershel C. Redd Jr.
     29,276 *
   
Laura C. Fulton
     28,719 *
   
Waters S. Davis, IV
(9)
     11,718 *
   
Beth A. Bowman
     18,863 *
   
Lindsey M. Cooksen
      9,279 *
   
R. Keith Teague
      5,000 *
   
Caron A. Lawhorn
          0 *
   
All directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons)
  3,210,432 1.44%
*

Less than 1%.

(1)

Unless otherwise indicated, the address for all beneficial owners in this table is 811 Louisiana Street, Suite 2100, Houston, Texas 77002.

Targa Resources Corp.
|
Proxy Statement
|
2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S
60

(2)

As reported on Schedule 13G/A as of December 31, 202029, 2023 and filed with the SEC on
February 10, 2021,
13, 2024, the business address for The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355. The Vanguard Group has shared voting power over 278,396398,532 shares of common stock, sole
dispositive
power over 22,804,97425,782,401 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power over 459,7681,031,774 shares of common stock.

(3)

As reported on Schedule 13G as of December 31, 20202023, and filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021,January 25, 2024, the business address for T. Rowe Price Associates,BlackRock, Inc. is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202. T. Rowe Price Associates,50 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001. BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 4,906,32518,224,325 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 17,250,26820,030,896 shares of common stock.

52


(4)

As reported on Schedule 13G as of December 31, 2023, and filed with the SEC on January 30, 2024, the business address for State Street Corporation is State Street Financial Center, 1 Congress Street, Suite 1, Boston, MA 02114. State Street Corporation has an aggregate beneficial ownership of 14,542,581 shares, sole voting power over 0 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power over 0 shares of
common
stock, shared voting power over 9,692,464 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power over 14,505,888 shares of common stock.
(5)
Shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Perkins include: (i) 480,283260,470 shares issued to the Perkins Blue House Investments Limited Partnership (“PBHILP”), (ii) 28,622 shares held by PBHtwo LP and (ii) 93(iii) 25,000 shares held by Mr. Perkins’ wife. Mr. Perkins is the sole member of JBP GP, L.L.C., one of the general partners of the PBHILP.

PBHILP and PBHtwo LP.
(5)(6)

Shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Pryor include 156,098 shares held by the Pryor Trust, of which Mr. Pryor and his spouse serve as
co-trustees.
(7)
Shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Chung include: (i) 244,208 shares held by the Paul Chung 2008 Family Trust, of which Mr. Chung serves as trustee; and (ii) 244,209200,500 shares held by the Helen Chung 2007 Family Trust, of which Mr. Chung’s spouse and Mr. Chung’s
sister-in-law
serve as
co-trustees.

(6)(8)

Shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Joyce include: (i) 223,759193,759 shares issued to The Rene Joyce 2010 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust, of which Mr. Joyce and his wife are
co-trustees
and have shared voting and investment power; and (ii) 401,292371,292 shares issued to The Kay Joyce 2010 Family Trust, of which Mr. Joyce’s wife is trustee and has sole voting and investment power. 575,567 shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Joyce are pledged to a financial institution to secure a loan.

(7)(9)

Shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mr. WhalenDavis include (i) 280,999 shares issued to the Whalen Family Investments Limited Partnership and (ii) 181,799 shares issued to the Whalen Family Investments Limited Partnership 2.

(8)

Shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Tong include 4346,777 shares held by the Waters Davis Legacy Trust, of which Mr. Tong’s wife.

Davis is
co-trustee
and
co-beneficiary.
(9)
Targa Resources Corp.
|
Proxy Statement
|
2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S

Shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Evans include 27,000 shares held by Mr. Evan’s wife.

61


SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE

UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 20202023, regarding our long-term incentive plans, under which our common stock is authorized for issuance to our employees, consultants and directors of us, the General Partner and their affiliates.directors. Our sole equity compensation plan, under which we will make equity grants, is our Second Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by our stockholders on May 22, 2017.Plan.

 

Plan category

Number of securities to

be issued upon exercise

of outstanding options,

warrants and rights

  
 Plan category

  Number of securities to be  
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,

warrants and rights

Weighted average


exercise price of


  
outstanding options,

  
warrants and rights

Number of securities remaining
  available for future issuance under  
equity compensation plans

(excluding securities reflected in
column (a))

  

Number of securities

remaining available for future

issuance under equity

compensation plans (excluding

securities reflected in column

(a))

 
 

 (a) (b)(b)(c)
  (c) 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)

 -  -6,866,2055,739,057

 

(1)

Generally, awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance share units to our officers and employees under the Stock Incentive Plan are subject to vesting over time as determined by the Compensation Committee and, prior to vesting, are subject to forfeiture. Stock incentive plan awards may vest in other circumstances, as approved by the Compensation Committee and reflected in an award agreement. Restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance share units are issued, subject to vesting, on the date of grant. The Compensation Committee may provide that dividends on restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance share units are subject to vesting and forfeiture provisions, in which case such dividends would be held, without interest, until they vest or are forfeited.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S62


TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Our Relationship with Targa Resources Partners LP and its General Partner

Our operating assets are held by subsidiaries of the Partnership and our interests in the Partnership consist of (i) a 2.0% general partner interest in the Partnership and (ii) all of the outstanding common units of the Partnership.

Reimbursement of Operating and General and Administrative Expense

Under the terms of the Partnership’s partnership agreement (the “partnership agreement”), the Partnership reimburses us for all direct and indirect expenses, as well as expenses otherwise allocable to the Partnership in

 

53


connection with the operation of the Partnership’s business, incurred on the Partnership’s behalf, which includes operating and direct expenses, including compensation and benefits of operating personnel, including 401(k), pension and health insurance benefits, and for the provision of various general and administrative services for the Partnership’s benefit. We perform centralized corporate functions for the Partnership, such as legal, accounting, treasury, insurance, risk management, health, safety and environmental, information technology, human resources, credit, payroll, internal audit, taxes, engineering and marketing. The General Partner determines the amount of general and administrative expenses to be allocated to the Partnership in accordance with the partnership agreement. Other than our direct costs of being a reporting company, so long as our operating assets are held by subsidiaries of the Partnership, substantially all of our general and administrative costs have been, and will continue to be, allocated to the Partnership.

Competition

We are not restricted, under the Partnership’s partnership agreement, from competing with the Partnership. We may acquire, construct or dispose of additional midstream energy or other assets in the future without any obligation to offer the Partnership the opportunity to purchase or construct those assets.

Contracts with Affiliates

Indemnification Agreements with Directors and Officers

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers, including directors and officers who serve or served as directors and/or officers of the General Partner.officers. Each indemnification agreement provides that we will indemnify and hold harmless each indemnitee for Expenses (as defined in the indemnification agreement) to the fullest extent permitted or authorized by law, including the Delaware General Corporation Law, in effect on the date of the agreement or as it may be amended to provide more advantageous rights to the indemnitee. If such indemnification is unavailable as a result of a court decision and if we and the indemnitee are jointly liable in the proceeding, we will contribute funds to the indemnitee for his or her Expenses in proportion to relative benefit and fault of us and indemnitee in the transaction giving rise to the proceeding.

Each indemnification agreement also provides that we will indemnify the indemnitee for monetary damages for actions taken as our director or officer or for serving at our request as a director or officer or another position at another corporation or enterprise, as the case may be but only if (i) the indemnitee acted in good faith and, in the case of conduct in his or her official capacity, in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in our best interests and, in all other cases, not opposed to our best interests and (ii) in the case of a criminal proceeding, the indemnitee must have had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful. The indemnification agreement also provides that we must advance payment of certain Expenses to the indemnitee, including fees of counsel, subject to receipt of an undertaking from the indemnitee to return such advance if it is ultimately determined that the indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification.

Transactions with Related Persons

Relationship with Sajet Resources LLC

In December 2010, immediately prior to Targa’s initial public offering, Sajet Resources LLC (“Sajet”) was spun-off, in part, from Targa. AtTarga to persons who were common equity holders in Targa at such time (the “Pre-IPO Holders”). Sajet’s assets were comprised of various non-core assets which were not considered to be central to the time, Rene Joyce, James Whalen and Joe Bob Perkins,business which Targa was taking public. The directors of Targa,Sajet were also directors of Sajet. Joe Bob Perkins, James Whalen, Paul Chung,Matthew J. Meloy, Jennifer R. Kneale, Robert M. Muraro, and Matthew Meloy, executive officers of Targa at the time, wereGerald R. Shrader, who are also executive officers of Sajet.Targa. The current directors of Sajet are Matthew Meloy, Jennifer Kneale, Regina Gregory and Scott Rogan. The current executive officers of Sajet arewere Matthew J. Meloy, Robert M. Muraro, Jennifer R. Kneale, Regina GregoryGerald R. Shrader and Julie Boushka.H. Boushka, who are also executive officers of Targa. The primary assets of Sajet areat the time of the Consolidation Transaction (as defined below) consisted of cash and interests in real property. Sajet also holds (i) an ownership interest in Floridian Natural Gas Storage Company, LLC through a December 2016 merger with Tesla Resources LLC and (ii) an ownership interest in Allied CNG Ventures LLC. Former holders of our pre-IPO common equity,The Pre-IPO Holders, including certain of our current and former executives, managers and directors,

54


collectively own an 18%owned a 17% interest in Sajet. We holdSajet (the “Minority Interest”).

On December 31, 2023, we rolled up and acquired all of the Minority Interests in Sajet through a merger (the “Consolidation Transaction”). Pursuant to or in connection with the Consolidation Transaction, (i) Sajet repaid to Targa approximately $15.3 million representing repayment of all of the outstanding principal on three outstanding promissory notes fromowed by Sajet in the amounts of $9.9 million, $0.5 million and $0.2 million. Theto Targa (including accrued interest, rate on each of the promissory notes accrueswhich accrued at the prime rate plus six percent annum.percent) and (ii) the Minority Interest holders were cashed out of Sajet for an aggregate cash consideration of $1,271,162 (the “Merger Consideration”). Certain of our directors and executive officers (in their capacity as holders of a portion of the Minority Interest) received a portion of the Merger Consideration as follows: Rene Joyce $197,231, Joe Bob Perkins $168,059, Paul Chung $108,757, Charlie Crisp $27,799, Clark White $21,867, Scott Pryor $21,867, Robert Muraro $12,953, and Matthew Meloy $11,100.

As a result of the Consolidation Transaction, Sajet is wholly-owned by Targa.

Since March 2018, Sajet has been accounted for on a consolidated basis in our consolidated financial statements.

Relationship with Apache Corp.

Rene R. Joyce, a director of Targa and of the Partnership’s general partner, is also a director of Apache Corporation (“Apache”) with whom we purchase and sell natural gas and NGLs and engage in construction services. During 2020, we made sales to Apache of $0.4 million and purchases of $71.1 million from Apache.

Relationship with NJR Energy Services Company

Robert B. Evans, a director of Targa and of the Partnership’s general partner, is also a director of New Jersey Resources Corporation (“NJR”). We have gas purchase and sale arrangements with NJR Energy Services Company (“NJR Services”), a subsidiary of NJR. During 2020, we made sales of $5.5 million to NJR Services and purchases of $12.4 million from NJR Services.

Relationships with Southern Company Gas, EOG Resources Inc., and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Charles R. Crisp, a director of the Company and of the Partnership’s general partner, is a director of Southern Company Gas, parent company of Sequent Energy Management, LP (“Sequent”) and Northern Illinois Gas Company d/b/a NICOR Energy (“NICOR”). We purchase and sell natural gas and NGL products from and to Sequent and sell natural gas products to NICOR. In addition, we purchase electricity from Mississippi Power (“MS Power”), an affiliate of Southern Company, parent company of Southern Company Gas. Mr. Crisp also serves as a director of EOG Resources, Inc. (“EOG”), from whom we purchase natural gas and from whom, together with EOG’s subsidiary EOG Resources Marketing, Inc. (“EOG Marketing”), we purchase crude oil. We also bill EOG and EOG Marketing for well connections to our gathering systems and associated equipment, and for services to operate certain EOG and jointly owned gas and crude oil gathering facilities. Mr. Crisp is also a director of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (“ICE Group”), parent company of ICE US OTC Commodity Markets LLC from whom we purchase brokerage services, NYSE Market Inc. and ICE NGX Canada Inc., which provide platform services utilized by us for the purchase and sale of physical gas and natural gas liquids with third parties. The following table shows our transactions with each of these entities during 2020:

Entity

             Sales                     Purchases        
     (In millions)

Sequent

 $    41.1   $    6.1  

NICOR

   0.2     

MS Power

       0.4 

EOG

   19.2    1.6 

ICE Group

   6.8    3.9 

Relationship with Southwest Energy LP

Ershel C. Redd Jr., a director of Targa and of the Partnership’s general partner, has an immediate family member who is an officer and part owner of Southwest Energy LP (“Southwest Energy”) from and to whom we purchase and sell natural gas and NGL products. During 2020, we made sales to Southwest Energy of $22.3 million and purchases of $2.9 million from Southwest Energy.

Relationship with Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Jennifer R. Kneale, our Chief Financial Officer, of Targa and of the Partnership’s general partner, has an immediate family member who is an officer of ICE Group. During 2020,2023, we made sales to ICE Group of $6.8$24,793,574 million and purchases of $3.9 million from ICE Group.Group of $5,368,283 million.

These transactions were at market prices consistent with similar transactions with other nonaffiliated entities.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S63

55


Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

Our policies and procedures for approval or ratification of transactions with “related persons” are not contained in our Audit Committee Charter which provides that the Audit Committee will review, approve or ratify, as necessary, related party transactions that are reportable under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K unless such related party transaction is reviewed, approved or ratified by another independent body of the Board. Any transaction to which we were, or are proposed to be, a single policyparty that involves an amount exceeding $120,000, and in which a director or procedure. Instead, they are reflectedexecutive officer (or such person’s immediate family member) has a material interest (a “related party transaction”) would be subject to this approval requirement. We expect that the Audit Committee would consider, among other things, the nature, size and terms of the transaction, the extent of the interest of the related party in the general operationproposed transaction and the existing relationship of our Board of Directors, consistent with past practice.the parties to the proposed transaction. We distribute and review a questionnaire to our executive officers and directors requesting information regarding, among other things, certain transactions with us in which they or their family members have an interest. Pursuant to our Code of Conduct, our officers and directors are required to avoid any activity or interest that creates a conflict of interest between them and us or any of our subsidiaries, unless the conflict is disclosed and pre-approved by our Board of Directors.

Director Independence

Mses. Bowman, Cooksen, and Fulton and Lawhorn and Messrs. Chung, Crisp, Davis, Evans, Joyce, ReddPerkins, Teague and TongRedd are our independent directors under the NYSE’s listing standards. On February 26, 2024, Mr. Evans resigned from the Board. Mr. Redd will not be standing for reelection and is retiring from the Board, effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting. Our Board of Directors examined the commercial relationships between us and companies for whom our independent directors serve as directors or with whom family membersand the terms of our independent directors have an employment relationship.the Sajet Consolidation Transaction. The commercial relationships reviewed consisted of product and services purchases and product sales at market prices consistent with similar arrangements with unrelated entities.

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee oversees our financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board of Directors. The charter, among other things, provides that the Audit Committee has authority to appoint, retain and oversee the independent auditor and is available on our website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance. At the time of the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, Mses. Bowman, Cooksen and Fulton and Mr. ReddEvans were the members of our Audit Committee. On March 15, 2021, Ms. Bowman andFebruary 26, 2024, Mr. ReddEvans resigned as membersa member of the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors appointed Mr. EvansTeague as a member of the Audit Committee.

In this context, the Audit Committee, as composed prior to March 15, 2021:Committee:

 

reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements;

reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements;

 

reviewed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality and acceptability of our accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under generally accepted auditing standards;

received the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence from the Company and its subsidiaries, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the firm’s independence;

discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required to be discussed by the accounting standards as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S64


discussed with the Company’s internal auditors and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the internal auditors and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of our internal controls and the overall quality of our financial reporting;

based on the foregoing reviews and discussions, recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, for filing with the SEC; and

approved the selection and appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our independent auditors. This report has been furnished by the members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

Audit Committee under generally accepted auditing standards;

received the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence from the Company and its subsidiaries, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the firm’s independence;

discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required to be discussed by the accounting standards as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;

discussed with the Company’s internal auditors and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the internal auditors and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of our internal controls and the overall quality of our financial reporting;

56


based on the foregoing reviews and discussions, recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, for filing with the SEC; and

approved the selection and appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our independent auditors.

This report has been furnished by the members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, as such committee was composed prior to March 15, 2021:

Audit Committee

Laura C. Fulton, Chairman

Beth A. Bowman (Former Committee Member)

Ershel C. Redd Jr. (Former Committee Member)

Lindsey M. Cooksen

The report of the Audit Committee in this report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any other filing by Targa Resources Corp. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S65

57


PROPOSAL TWO

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent auditors of the Company for 2021.2024. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements since 2005. The 20202023 audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements was completed on February 18, 2021.15, 2024.

The Board of Directors is submitting the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for ratification at the Annual Meeting. The submission of this matter for approval by stockholders is not legally required, but the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee believe the submission provides an opportunity for stockholders through their vote to communicate with the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee about an important aspect of corporate governance. If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection of that firm as the Company’s auditors.

The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to retain, evaluate and replace the Company’s auditors. The stockholders’ ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not limit the authority of the Audit Committee to change auditors at any time.

Audit and Other Fees

The Audit Committee has approved the use of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent principal accountant. All services provided by our independent principal accountant are subject to pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is informed of each engagement of the independent principal accountant to provide services to us.

We have engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent principal accountant. The following table summarizes fees we were billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for independent auditing, tax and related services for each of the last two fiscal years:

 

      2020        2019   
  (In millions) 
Audit fees (1) $    4.4  $    4.8 
Audit-related fees (2)      
Tax fees (3)      
All other fees (4)  0.2   0.2 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
 $4.6  $5.0 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

   
  

 

        2023               2022       
  
  

 

 (In millions)
   

Audit fees (1)

 $  4.6 $  4.3
   

Audit-related fees (2)

     —     —
   

Tax fees (3)

     —     —
   

All other fees (4)

    0.4     —
   
 

 

 $  5.0 $  4.3

 

(1)

Audit fees represent amounts billed for each of the years presented for professional services rendered in connection with (i) the integrated audit of our annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, (ii) the review of our quarterly financial statements or (iii) those services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements including comfort letters, consents and other services related to SEC matters. This information is presented as of the latest practicable date for this proxy statement.

 

(2)

Audit-related fees represent amounts we were billed in each of the years presented for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit or quarterly reviews of our financial statements and are not reported under audit fees.

 

(3)

Tax fees represent amounts we were billed in each of the years presented for professional services rendered in connection with tax compliance.

 

(4)

All other fees represent amounts we were billed in each of the years presented for services not classifiable under the other categories listed in the table above.

The Company expects that representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if they desire to do so.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S66

58


Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures


The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit services performed by the independent auditor to assure that performing such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve fees related to other non-recurring services. During the approval process, the Audit Committee considers the impact of the types of services and the related fees on the independence of the auditors. The services and fees must be deemed compatible with the maintenance of the auditors’ independence, including compliance with SEC rules and regulations.

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to be voted on the proposal on the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote at the 2021 Annual Meeting is required for approval of Proposal Two. Brokers have discretionary authority in the absence of timely instructions from you to vote on this proposal. Please see “Quorum and Voting—Vote Required” for further information regarding the impact of abstentions and broker non-votes.

Recommendation of our Board of Directors

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent auditors of the Company for 2021.2024.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S67

59


PROPOSAL THREE

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Introduction

We are asking our stockholders to provide advisory, non-binding approval of the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as described in the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement, beginning on page 35.45. Our Board of Directors recognizes that executive compensation is an important matter for our stockholders. As described in detail in the CD&A section of this proxy statement, the Compensation Committee is tasked with the implementation of our executive compensation philosophy, and the core of that philosophy is to pay our executives based on performance. In particular, the Compensation Committee strives to attract, retain and motivate exceptional executives, to reward past performance measured against established goals and provide incentives for future performance, and to align executives’ long-term interests with the interests of our stockholders. To do so, the Compensation Committee uses a combination of short- and long-term incentive compensation to reward near-term excellent performance and to encourage executives’ commitment to our long-range, strategic business goals. It is the intention of the Compensation Committee that our executive officers be compensated competitively and consistently with our strategy, sound corporate governance principles, other companies in the same and closely related industries, and stockholder interests and concerns.

As described in the CD&A, we believe our compensation program is effective, appropriate and strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders and that the total compensation package provided to our named executive officers (including potential payouts upon a termination or change ofin control) are reasonable and not excessive. As you consider this Proposal Three, we urge you to read the CD&A section of this proxy statement for additional details on executive compensation, including information about our compensation philosophy and objectives and the past compensation of our named executive officers, and to review the tabular disclosures regarding named executive officer compensation together with the accompanying narrative disclosures in the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement. Among the program features incorporated by the Compensation Committee to align with our executive compensation philosophy are the following:

 

annual base salary, which is annual fixed-cash compensation that is a critical factor in attracting and retaining qualified talent;

annual base salary, which is annual fixed-cash compensation that is a critical factor in attracting and retaining qualified talent;

 

annual variable incentive bonus awards, paid in the form of cash, tied to the achievement of key financial, operational and strategic objectives based on a rigorous, holistic evaluation of performance, ultimately subject to the Compensation Committee’s business judgement; and

annual variable incentive bonus awards, paid in the form of cash, tied to the achievement of key financial, operational and strategic objectives based on a rigorous, holistic evaluation of performance, ultimately subject to the Compensation Committee’s business judgement; and

 

a combination of restricted stock unit awards and performance share unit awards under our stock incentive plan to promote alignment with our stockholders by tying a majority of our executive officers’ compensation to creation of long-term value and by encouraging executives to build meaningful equity ownership stakes.

a combination of restricted stock unit awards and performance share unit awards under our stock incentive plan to promote alignment with our stockholders by tying a majority of our executive officers’ compensation to creation of long-term value and by encouraging executives to build meaningful equity ownership stakes.

Section 14A of the Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we provide stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, our named executive officers’ compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the rules of the SEC. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.

As an advisory vote, Proposal Three is not binding on our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee, will not overrule any decisions made by our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee, and will not require our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee to take any specific action. Although the vote is non-binding, our Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders, and will carefully consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers. In particular, to the extent there is any significant vote against our named executive officers’ compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns, and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.

We currently conduct annual advisory votes on executive compensation and expect to conduct the next advisory vote at our next annual meeting of stockholders in 2025.

60

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S68


Text of the Resolution to be Adopted

We are asking stockholders to vote FOR the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the CD&A, the 20202023 Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosures.”

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to be voted on the proposal on the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote at the 2021 Annual Meeting is required for approval of Proposal Three. If you own shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must instruct your bank, broker or other holder of record how to vote in order for them to vote your shares so that your vote can be counted on this proposal. Please see “Quorum and Voting—Vote Required” for further information regarding the impact of abstentions and broker non-votes.

Recommendation of our Board of Directors

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S69

61


PROPOSAL FOUR

AUTHORIZATION AND APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE TO 450,000,000 SHARES

Our Board of Directors has approved a proposal to amend Article FOURTH of the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) to increase the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock from 300,000,000 to 450,000,000 and has directed that the amendment be submitted to the Company’s stockholders for their approval. We are not proposing any increase to the authorized number of shares of the Company’s preferred stock, which will remain unchanged at 100,000,000 shares. The proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation would replace the first sentence of the first paragraph of Article FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation with the following language:

“The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 550 million shares of capital stock, classified as (i) 100 million shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Preferred Stock”), and (ii) 450 million shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”).”

The Board of Directors believes it is in the best interest of the Company to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock in order to give the Company greater flexibility in considering and planning for future general corporate needs, including shares reserved under equity compensation plans. Additionally, as further described below, after accounting for the current number of outstanding, authorized and reserved shares of our common stock, we have approximately five percent of our authorized shares of common stock available for issuance. As a result, the Board of Directors believes that the amount of the proposed increase in the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance will give the Company greater flexibility to address future general corporate needs while reducing the need to routinely submit additional proposals to the Company’s stockholders to further increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance.    

The Certificate of Incorporation presently authorizes us to issue 300,000,000 shares of common stock, of which, as March 1, 2021, (i) 228,654,246 shares were issued and outstanding (excluding treasury shares) (ii) 10,952,462 shares remain authorized for issuance under our Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (including shares subject to outstanding awards) and (iii) 44,260,953 shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to the terms of our Series A Preferred Stock, which requires us to use commercially reasonable efforts to reserve for issuance the number of shares of common stock that would be issuable upon conversion of all outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock. Based on the number of outstanding, authorized and reserved shares of common stock described above, we have only 16,132,339 shares of common stock remaining available for issuance for future corporate needs. To that end, if this proposal is not approved by the Company’s stockholders, then our ability to seek favorable financing and acquisition opportunities in a timely manner, to continue to issue equity awards under our compensation plans and to complete other corporate transactions requiring the issuance of common stock may be adversely affected. Such consequences may put us at a competitive disadvantage in relation to our competitors and adversely impact our business and financial results.

The Company has no current plan, commitment, arrangement, understanding or agreement regarding the issuance of the additional shares of common stock that will result from the Company’s adoption of the proposed amendment. Except as otherwise required by law or by a regulation of the NYSE, the newly authorized shares of common stock will be available for issuance at the discretion of the Board of Directors (without further action by the stockholders) for various future corporate needs. Adoption of the proposed amendment would not have any immediate dilutive effect on the proportionate voting power or other rights of the Company’s existing stockholders, but any future issuance of additional authorized shares of the Company’s common stock may, among other things, dilute the earnings per share of the common stock and the equity and voting rights of those holding common stock.

In addition to the corporate purposes previously mentioned, an increase in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock may make it more difficult to, or discourage an attempt to, obtain control

62


of the Company by means of a takeover bid that the Board of Directors determines is not in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. Nevertheless, the Board of Directors does not intend or view the proposed increase in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock as an anti-takeover measure and is not aware of any attempt or plan to obtain control of the Company.

Any newly authorized shares of the Company’s common stock will be identical to the shares of common stock now authorized and outstanding. The proposed amendment will not affect the rights of current holders of the Company’s common stock, none of whom has preemptive or similar rights to acquire the newly authorized shares.

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of holders of at least 66 2/3% of the shares outstanding and entitled to be voted on the proposal on the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote at the 2021 Annual Meeting is required for approval of Proposal Four. Brokers have discretionary authority in the absence of timely instructions from you to vote on this proposal. Please see “Quorum and Voting—Vote Required” for further information regarding the impact of abstentions and broker non-votes.

Recommendation of our Board of Directors

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the authorization and approval of an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance to 450,000,000 shares.

63


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS

FOR 2022; THE 2025 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS;

IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES

Any stockholder of the Company who desires to submit a proposal for action at the 20222025 annual meeting of Stockholdersstockholders and wishes to have such proposal (a “Rule 14a-8 Proposal”) included in the Company’s proxy materials must follow the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and must submit such Rule 14a-8 Proposal to the Company at its principal executive offices no later than December 9, 2021,November 21, 2024, unless the Company notifies the stockholders otherwise. Only those Rule 14a-8 Proposals that are timely received by the Company and proper for stockholder action (and otherwise proper) will be included in the Company’s proxy materials.

The Company’s bylaws provide for proxy access whereby a stockholder or a group of up to 20 stockholders (with funds having specified relationships constituting a single stockholder) owning at least 3% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock continuously for at least three years may nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials up to a number of director nominees that constitutes no more than 20% of the total number of directors on the Board, provided that the stockholder and nominee(s) satisfy the requirements set forth in the Company’s bylaws. Any stockholder who intends to use these procedures to nominate a candidate for election to the Board for inclusion in our 2025 proxy statement must satisfy the requirements set forth in the Company’s bylaws and must provide notice to the Company, which must be delivered to, mailed and received at, the principal executive offices of the Company by the Secretary of the Company, no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days before the anniversary of the date that the Company delivered its proxy statement for the immediately proceeding annual meeting of stockholders, and in the case of the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders, between October 22, 2024 and November 21, 2024. The notice of proxy access must include information specified in Article II, Section 2.8 of the Company’s bylaws, including information concerning the nominee(s) and information about the stockholder’s ownership of and agreements related to the Company’s stock.

Any stockholder of the Company who desires to submit a proposal for action at the 20222025 annual meeting of stockholders but does not wish to have such proposal (a “Non-Rule 14a-8 Proposal”) included in the Company’s proxy materials (a “Non-Rule 14a-8 Proposal”), must comply with the requirements set forth in the Company’s bylaws and submit such a Non-Rule 14a-8 Proposal to the Company at its principal executive offices so that it is received between January 25, 202216, 2025 and February 24, 2022,15, 2025, unless the Company notifies the stockholders otherwise.

“Discretionary voting authority” is the ability to vote proxies that stockholders have executed and submitted to the Company, on matters not specifically reflected in the Company’s proxy materials, and on which stockholders have not had an opportunity to vote by proxy.

It is the responsibility of the Nominating and Governance Committee to identify, evaluate and recommend to the Board of Directors nominees for election at the annual meeting of stockholders, as well as to fill vacancies or additions on the Board of Directors that may occur between annual meetings. When recommending director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers and reviews each candidate’s relevant skills and experience, business judgment, service on boards of directors of other companies, personal and professional integrity, including commitment to the Company’s core values, openness and ability to work as part of a team, the overall variety and mix of experience, skills, attributes and viewpoints of the Board of Directors, taken as a whole, willingness to commit the required time to serve as a board member and familiarity with the Company and its industry.

Although the Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity, the Committee considers the diversity of, and the optimal enhancement of the current mix of talent and experience on the Board of Directors and endeavors to achieve an overall balance of diversity of experiences, skills, attributes and viewpoints. The Nominating and Governance Committee believes it has achieved that balance through the representation on the Board of Directors of members having experience in various sectors of the energy industry, finance, accounting and investment analysis, among other areas. The Nominating and Governance Committee does not discriminate based upon race, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, citizenship or any other legally protected status.

In identifying potential director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee relies on any source available for the identification and recommendation of candidates, including current directors and officers and stockholders. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee from time to time may engage a third party search firm to identify or evaluate, or assist in identifying or evaluating potential candidates, for which the third party search firm will be paid a fee.

The Nominating and Governance Committee will also consider any nominee recommended by stockholders for election at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 20222025 if that nomination complies with the requirements set forth in the Company’s bylaws and is submitted in writing, between January 25, 202216, 2025 and February 24, 2022,15, 2025, to Targa Resources Corp., 811 Louisiana Street, Suite 2100, Houston, Texas 77002, Attention: Secretary. The Nominating and Governance Committee treats recommendations for directors that are received from the Company’s stockholders equally with recommendations received from any other source. With respect to each such nominee, the stockholder must provide all of the information required by our bylaws, including the following information that must be provided to the Company with the written nomination:

 

 a)

the nominee’s name, address and other personal information;

 

 b)

the number of shares of each class and series of stock of the Company held by such nominee;

 

64


 c)

the nominating stockholder’s name, residential address and telephone number, and business address and telephone number; and

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S70


 d)

all other information required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

Each submission must also include a statement of the qualifications of the nominee, a notarized consent signed by the nominee evidencing a willingness to serve as a director, if elected, and a written representation and agreement that such person (i) is not and will not become a party to any voting agreement or compensation agreement that has not been disclosed to the Company or that could limit or interfere with the nominee’s ability to comply with their fiduciary duties under applicable law and (ii) will comply with all of the Company’s applicable corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality and stock ownership and trading policies and guidelines.

To comply with Rule 14a-19 of the Exchange Act, in addition to satisfying the requirements in the notice procedures of our bylaws as set forth above, a stockholder who intends to solicit proxies in support of nominees other than the Company’s nominees for our 2025 annual meeting of Stockholders must provide the information required under Rule 14a-19 of the Exchange Act to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive offices, as set forth below, so that it is received between January 16, 2025 and February 15, 2025, unless Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act provides for an earlier date, in which case, such earlier date shall apply.

Written requests for inclusion of any stockholder proposal should be addressed to Targa Resources Corp., 811 Louisiana Street, Suite 2100, Houston, Texas 77002, Attention: Secretary. The Company suggests that any such proposal be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S71


SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

Solicitation of Proxies may be made by internet, mail, personal interview or telephone by officers, directors and regular employees of the Company. The Company may also request banking institutions, brokerage firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation material to the beneficial owners of the common stock that those companies or persons hold of record, and the Company will reimburse the forwarding expenses. In addition, the Company has retained Alliance Advisors, LLC to assist in solicitation for an initial fee of $18,000$10,000 and the reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. The Company will bear all costs of solicitation.

STOCKHOLDER LIST

In accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Company will maintain at its corporate offices in Houston, Texas, a list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The list will be open to the examination of any stockholder, for purposes germane to the Annual Meeting, during ordinary business hours for ten days before the Annual Meeting and at the Annual Meeting.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S72


PROXY MATERIALS, ANNUAL REPORT AND OTHER INFORMATION

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20202023 is being made available to stockholders concurrently with this proxy statement and does not form part of the proxy solicitation material.

A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, as filed with the SEC, will be sent to any stockholder without charge upon written request. One copy of the Notice, this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Proxy Materials”) will be sent to stockholders who share an address, unless they have notified the Company that they want to continue receiving multiple packages. A copy of the Proxy Materials will also be promptly sent upon written or oral request to any stockholder of a shared address to which a single copy of the Proxy Materials was delivered. If two or more stockholders with a shared address are currently receiving only one copy of the Proxy Materials, then the stockholders may request to receive multiple packages in the future, or if a stockholder is currently receiving multiple packages of the Proxy Materials, then the stockholder may request to receive a single copy in the future. Such requests may be made by writing to Investor Relations, Targa Resources Corp., 811 Louisiana Street, Suite 2100, Houston, Texas 77002 or by calling (713) 584-1133. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K is also available at the SEC’s website in its EDGAR database at www.sec.gov.www.sec.gov.

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S73

65


INTERNET AND PHONE VOTING

For shares of stock that are registered in your name, you may vote by internet or phone using procedures provided by Alliance Advisors, LLC. Votes submitted by internet or phone must be received by 11:59 p.m., Central Time, on May 24, 2021.15, 2024. The giving of such a proxy will not affect your right to vote in person should you decide to attend the Annual Meeting.

The internet and phone voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholder identities, to allow stockholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly. Stockholders voting by internet should remember that the stockholder must bear costs associated with electronic access, such as usage charges from internet access providers and telephone companies.

For shares of stock that are registered in a street name (the stockholder owns shares in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record on the books of the Company’s transfer agent), you will receive instructions with your proxy materials that you must follow in order to have your shares voted. Please review your proxy card or voting instruction card to determine whether you can vote by phone or electronically.

******

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT PROXIES BE RETURNED PROMPTLY. WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON, YOU ARE URGED TO VOTE BY INTERNET, BY PHONE OR IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED PAPER COPIES OF THE PROXY MATERIALS, BY COMPLETING, SIGNING AND RETURNING THE PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID, ADDRESSED ENVELOPE.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Regina L. GregoryGerald R. Shrader

SecretarySECRETARY

Houston, Texas

April 1, 2021March 21, 2024

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S74


APPENDIX A

 

66


Appendix A

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This proxy statement includes the Company’s non-GAAP financial measures: Adjusted EBITDA, andadjusted free cash flow and distributable cash flow. The following tables provide reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measure. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as alternatives to GAAP measures such as net income or any other GAAP measure of liquidity or financial performance.

The Company utilizes We utilize non-GAAP measures to analyze the Company’sour performance. Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are non-GAAP measures. The GAAP measure most directly comparable to these non-GAAP measures isare income (loss) from operations, net income (loss) attributable to the Company.Company and segment operating margin. These non-GAAP measures should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP net income attributable to the Companymeasures and have important limitations as analytical tools. Investors should not consider these measures in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of the Company’sour results as reported under GAAP. Additionally, because the Company’s our non-GAAP measures exclude some, but not all, items that affect net income and segment operating margin, and are defined differently by different companies within the Company’sour industry, the Company’sour definitions may not be comparable with similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing their utility. Management compensates for the limitations of the Company’s our non-GAAP measures as analytical tools by reviewing the comparable GAAP measures, understanding the differences between the measures and incorporating these insights into the Company’sour decision-making processes.

Adjusted EBITDA

AdjustedWe define adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) attributable to the Company before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and other items that the Company believeswe believe should be adjusted consistent with the Company’sour core operating performance. The adjusting items are detailed in the Adjustedadjusted EBITDA reconciliation table and its footnotes. Adjusted EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measure by the Companyus and by external users of the Company’sour financial statements such as investors, commercial banks and others to measure the ability of the Company’sour assets to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs, support the Company’sour indebtedness and pay dividends to the Company’sour investors.

Distributable Cash Flow and Adjusted Free Cash Flow

FreeWe define distributable cash flow is defined as Adjustedadjusted EBITDA less distributions to the PartnershipTRP preferred limited partners, cash interest expense on debt obligations, cash tax (expense) benefit and maintenance capital expenditures (net of any reimbursements of project costs),. The Preferred Units that were issued by the Partnership in October 2015 were redeemed in December 2020. We define adjusted free cash flow as distributable cash flow less growth capital expenditures, net of contributions from noncontrolling interest and net contributions to investments in unconsolidated affiliates. The preferred units that were issued by the Partnership in October 2015 were redeemed in December 2020, and are no longer outstanding as of the end of the year. FreeDistributable cash flow is aand adjusted free cash flow are performance measuremeasures used by the Companyus and by external users of the Company’sour financial statements, such as investors, commercial banks and research analysts, to assess the Company’sour ability to generate cash earnings (after servicing the Company’sour debt and funding capital expenditures) to be used for corporate purposes, such as payment of dividends, retirement of debt or redemption of other financing arrangements.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S75



Reconciliation

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income attributabletables reconcile the non-GAAP financial measures used by management to Targa to Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flowthe most directly comparable GAAP measures for the periods indicated:indicated.

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
              2020                              2019             
  (In millions)    
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) attributable to Targa to Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow        
Net income (loss) attributable to Targa     $(1,553.9              $(209.2 
Income attributable to TRP preferred limited partners                          15.1                                11.3          
Interest (income) expense, net  391.3        337.8  
Income tax expense (benefit)  (248.1       (87.9 
Depreciation and amortization expense  865.1        971.6  
Impairment of long-lived assets  2,442.8        225.3  
(Gain) loss on sale or disposition of business and assets  58.4        71.1  
Write-down of assets  55.6        17.9  
(Gain) loss from sale of equity-method investment          (69.3 
(Gain) loss from financing activities (1)  (45.6       1.4  
Equity (earnings) loss  (72.6       (39.0 
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates and preferred partner interests, net  108.6        61.2  
Change in contingent considerations  (0.3       8.7  
Compensation on equity grants  66.2        60.3  
Risk management activities  (228.2       112.8  
Severance and related benefits (2)  6.5          
Noncontrolling interests adjustments (3)  (224.3       (38.5 
 

 

 

       

 

 

  
Targa Adjusted EBITDA     $1,636.6         $1,435.5  
 

 

 

       

 

 

  
Distributions to TRP preferred limited partners  (15.1       (11.3 
Interest expense on debt obligations (4)  (388.9       (342.1 
Cash tax refund  44.4          
Maintenance capital expenditures  (109.5       (141.7 
Noncontrolling interests adjustments of maintenance capital expenditures  5.3        6.8  
 

 

 

       

 

 

  
Growth capital expenditures, net (5)  (597.9       (2,281.7 
 

 

 

       

 

 

  
Free Cash Flow     $574.9         $(1,334.5 
 

 

 

       

 

 

  
  
  

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
      
  

 

  2023   2022   2021   2020   2019 
  
  

 

  (In millions) 
  

Reconciliation of Net income (loss) attributable
to Targa Resources Corp. to Adjusted EBITDA,
Distributable Cash Flow and Adjusted Free Cash Flow

                         
     

Net income (loss) attributable to Targa Resources Corp.

   $  1,345.9    $  1,195.5    $  71.2    $  (1,553.9)    $  (209.2) 
     

Income attributable to TRP preferred limited partners

               15.1    11.3 
     

Interest (income) expense, net (1)

   687.8    446.1    387.9    391.3    337.8 
     

Income tax expense (benefit)

   363.2    131.8    14.8    (248.1)    (87.9) 
     

Depreciation and amortization expense

   1,329.6    1,096.0    870.6    865.1    971.6 
     

Impairment of long-lived assets

           452.3    2,442.8    225.3 
     

(Gain) loss on sale or disposition of business and assets

   (5.3)    (9.6)    2.0    58.4    71.1 
     

Write-down of assets

   6.9    9.8    10.3    55.6    17.9 
     

(Gain) loss from financing activities (2)

   2.1    49.6    16.6    (45.6)    1.4 
     

(Gain) loss from sale of equity-method investment

       (435.9)            (69.3) 
     

Transaction costs related to business acquisition (3)

       23.9             
     

Equity (earnings) loss

   (9.0)    (9.1)    23.9    (72.6)    (39.0) 
     

Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates and preferred partner interests, net

   18.6    27.2    116.5    108.6    61.2 
     

Change in contingent considerations

           0.1    (0.3)    8.7 

 

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S76


  
  

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
      
  

 

  2023   2022   2021   2020   2019 
  
  

 

  (In millions) 
     

Compensation on equity grants

   62.4    57.5    59.2    66.2    60.3 
     

Risk management activities (4)

   (275.4)    302.5    116.0    (228.2)    112.8 
     

Severance and related benefits (5)

               6.5     
     

Noncontrolling interests adjustments (6)

   (3.7)    15.8    (89.4)    (224.3)    (38.5) 
     

Litigation expense (7)

   6.9                 
     

Adjusted EBITDA (8)

   $  3,530.0    $  2,901.1    $  2,052.0    $  1,636.6    $  1,435.5 
     

Distributions to TRP preferred limited partners

               (15.1)    (11.3) 
     

Interest expense on debt obligations (9)

   (675.8)    (447.6)    (376.2)    (388.9)    (342.1) 
     

Maintenance capital expenditures, net (10)

   (223.4)    (168.1)    (131.7)    (104.2)    (134.9) 
     

Cash taxes

   (13.6)    (6.7)    (2.7)    44.4     
     

Distributable Cash Flow

   $  2,617.2    $  2,278.7    $  1,541.4    $  1,172.8    $  947.2 
     

Growth capital expenditures, net (10)

   (2,224.5)    (1,177.2)    (407.7)    (597.9)    (2,281.7) 
     

Adjusted Free Cash Flow

   $  392.7    $  1,101.5    $  1,133.7    $  574.9    $  (1,334.5) 

(1)

Includes the change in estimated redemption value of the mandatorily redeemable preferred interests.

(2)

Gains or losses on debt repurchases or early debt extinguishments.

(2)(3)

Includes financial advisory, legal and other professional fees, and other one-time transaction costs.

(4)

Risk management activities related to derivative instruments including the cash impact of hedges acquired in the 2015 mergers with Atlas Energy L.P. and Atlas Pipeline Partners L.P. The cash impact of the acquired hedges ended in December 2017.

(5)

Represents one-time severance and related benefit expense related to the Company’s cost reduction measures.

(3)(6)

Noncontrolling interest portion of depreciation and amortization expense (including the effects of the impairment of long-lived assets on non-controlling interests).

(4)(7)

Charges related to litigation resulting from winter storm in February 2021 unreflective of our ongoing core operations.

(8)

Beginning in the second quarter of 2019, we revised our reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) attributable to TRC to Adjusted EBITDA to exclude the Splitter Agreement adjustment previously included in the comparative periods presented herein. For all comparative periods presented, our Adjusted EBITDA measure previously included the Splitter Agreement adjustment, which represented the recognition of the annual cash payment received under the condensate splitter agreement ratably over four quarters. The effect of these revisions reduced TRC’s Adjusted EBITDA by $75.2 million and $43.0 million for 2018 and 2017. There was no impact to Distributable Cash Flow.

(9)

Excludes amortization of interest expense.

(5)(10)

Represents growth capital expenditures, net of contributions from noncontrolling interests and includes net contributions to investments in unconsolidated affiliates.

Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S77


LOGO


LOGO

Targa Resources Corp. 20212024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 25, 202116, 2024 8:00 a.m. Central Time 811 Louisiana Street Suite 2100 Houston, Texas 77002 This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The undersigned stockholder(s) of Targa Resources Corp. hereby acknowledge receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Proxy Statement for the 20212024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) and the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202023 and hereby appoint Jennifer R. Kneale and Regina L. Gregory,Gerald R. Shrader, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power of substitution, to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess itif personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Targa Resources Corp. to be held on May 25, 202116, 2024 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof. The undersigned hereby revokes all proxies previously given by the undersigned to vote at the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. Should the undersigned be present and choose to vote at the Annual Meeting, and once the Corporate Secretary is notified of the decision to terminate this proxy, then the power of the proxies will be terminated. The shares represented by this proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed by the undersigned stockholder(s). If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR all nominees listed in Item 1 and FOR Items 2 3 and 4.3. If any other matters come properly before the meeting, the person named in this proxy will vote in their discretion.discretion pursuant to Rule 14a-4(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Continued and to be signed on the reverse side PLEASE DETACH ALONG PERFORATED LINE AND MAIL IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 25, 2021.16, 2024. The Proxy Statement is available at http://www.viewproxy.com/Targa/20212024


LOGO


LOGO

Please mark your votes like this
The Board of Directors Recommendsrecommends a vote FOR each of the nominees listed in Item 1 and FOR Items 2 3 and 4.
3. 1. To elect the fivethree Class II Directors named in this proxy statement, each to serve until the 2024
2027 2. To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders:stockholders. independent auditors for 20212024. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 01 Beth A. Bowman FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 02 Lindsey M. Cooksen 3.Cooksen. To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named 03 Robert B. Evans executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 042023. 03 Joe Bob Perkins AGAINST ABSTAIN 05 Ershel C. Redd Jr. 4. To approve an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance to 450,000,000 shares. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN ABSTAIN 1 FOR Date Signature DO NOT PRINT IN THIS AREA Signature (Shareholder Name & Address Data) Signature Address Change: (If you noted any Address Changes above, please mark box.) Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting Signature Please sign exactly as name(s) appear hereonappears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. CONTROL NUMBER
A Address Change: (If you noted Please indicate if you any Address Changes above, plan to attend this meeting ☐ please mark box.) ☐ PLEASE DETACH ALONG PERFORATED LINE AND MAIL IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. A TARGA RESOURCES CORP. As a shareholder of Targa Resources Corp., you have the option of voting your shares electronically through the Internet or on the telephone, eliminating the need to return the proxy card. Your electronic vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed, dated and returned the proxy card. Votes submitted electronically over the Internet or by telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m., CT on May 24, 2021.15, 2024. SCAN TO CONTROL NUMBER SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE w PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS Please have your 11-digit control number ready when voting by Internet or Telephone
INTERNET TELEPHONE MAIL Vote Your Proxy on the Internet: Vote Your Proxy by Phone: Vote Your Proxy by Mail: Go to www.AALVote.com/TRGP Call 1 (866) 804-9616 Have your proxy card available Use any touch-tone telephone to Mark, sign, and date your proxy when you access the above website. Follow the prompts to vote your shares.
TELEPHONE Vote Your Proxy by Phone:
Call 1 (866) 804-9616
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card available when you call. Follow the voting instructions to vote your shares.
MAIL Vote Your Proxy by Mail: Mark, sign, and date your proxy card, then detach it, and return website. Follow the prompts to card available when you call. it in the postage-paid envelope vote your shares. Follow the voting instructions to provided.
vote your shares. If you vote your proxy by Internet or by Telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your Proxy Card.