Washington,(Amendment (Amendment No. )☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ ☒ Definitive Proxy Statement ☐ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Targa Resources Corp.(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):☒ No fee required. ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:(5)Total fee paid:☐Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ☐ Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided byRule 0-11(a)(2) Rules identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.(1)Amount Previously Paid:(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:(3)Filing Party:(4)Date Filed:
TARGA RESOURCES CORP.
811 Louisiana Street
|Suite 2100
|Houston, Texas 77002
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To the Stockholders of Targa Resources Corp.:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Targa Resources Corp. (the “Company” or “Targa”) will be held at 811 Louisiana Street, Suite 2100, Houston, TX 77002 on May 25, 2021,16, 2024, at 8:00 a.m. Central Time (the “Annual Meeting”). The Annual Meeting is being held for the following purposes:
1. | To elect the |
2. | To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for |
3. | To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, |
4. |
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting. |
These proposals are described in the accompanying proxy materials. You will be able to vote at the Annual Meeting only if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March 29, 2021.19, 2024.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Please vote over the internet at www.AALVote.com/TRGP or by phone at 1-866-804-9616 promptly so that your shares may be voted in accordance with your wishes and so we may have a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Alternatively, if you did not receive a paper copy of the proxy materials (which includes the proxy card), you may request a paper proxy card, which you may complete, sign and return by mail.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
By Order of the Board of Directors, | ||||
| ||||
Gerald R. Shrader | Houston, Texas | |||
SECRETARY | March 21, 2024 |
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 25, 2021:May 16, 2024:
OUR PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 20212024 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND OUR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K ARE AVAILABLE AT http:HTTP://www.viewproxy.com/Targa/2021.WWW.VIEWPROXY.COM/TARGA/2024.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TARGA RESOURCES CORP.
(the “Company”)
811 Louisiana Street
Suite 2100
Houston, Texas 77002
PROXY STATEMENT
2021
TARGA RESOURCES CORP. (the “Company”)
811 Louisiana Street | Suite 2100 | Houston, Texas 77002
PROXY STATEMENT
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors” or “Board”) is providing the information in this proxy statement to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) that will be held May 25, 2021,16, 2024, at 8:00 a.m. Central Time, at 811 Louisiana Street, Suite 2100, Houston, TX 77002. By submitting your proxy card, you authorize the persons named on the proxy card to represent you and vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. Those persons will also be authorized to vote your shares to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time and to vote your shares at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.
We encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote in person. Only stockholders of the Company (or their authorized representatives) and the Company’s invited guests may attend the Annual Meeting. All attendees should be prepared to present government-issued photo identification (such as a driver’s license or passport) for admittance. If you are not present at the Annual Meeting, your shares may be voted only by a person to whom you have given a proper proxy. You may revoke your proxy in writing at any time before it is exercised at the Annual Meeting by delivering to the Secretary of the Company a written notice of the revocation, by submitting your vote electronically through the internet or by phone after the grant of your proxy, or by signing and delivering to the Secretary of the Company a proxy card with a later date. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not revoke your proxy unless you give written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company before your proxy is exercised or unless you vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting.
We intend to hold theElectronic Availability of Proxy Statement and Annual Meeting in person. However, we are continuing to actively monitor the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and related governmental restrictions; we are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our stockholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold the Annual Meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the meeting partially or solely by means of remote communication. Please monitor our Annual Meeting website at http://www.viewproxy.com/Targa/2021 for updated information.
ELECTRONIC AVAILABILITY OF PROXY STATEMENT AND ANNUAL REPORTReport
As permitted under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company is making this proxy statement and its Annual Report on Form 10-K available to its stockholders electronically via the internet. The Company is sending on or about April 8, 2021,March 21, 2024, a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to its stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 29, 2021,19, 2024, which Notice will include (i) instructions on how to access the Company’s proxy materials electronically, (ii) the date, time and location of the Annual Meeting, (iii) a description of the matters intended to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, (iv) a list of the materials being made available electronically, (v) instructions on how a stockholder can request to receive paper or e-mail copies of the Company’s proxy materials, (vi) any control/identification numbers that a stockholder needs to access his or her proxy card and instructions on how to access the proxy card, and (vii) information about attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.
1
Stockholders of Record and Beneficial Owners
Most of the Company’s stockholders hold their shares through a broker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.
Stockholders of Record.Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice is being sent directly to you by our agent. As a stockholder of record, you have the right to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail instead of the Notice, the proxy materials include a proxy card for the Annual Meeting.
Beneficial Owners. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice will be forwarded to you by your bank, broker or nominee. The bank, broker or nominee is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker how to vote. Beneficial owners that receive the Notice by mail from the stockholder of record should follow the instructions included in the Notice to
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 3 |
view the proxy statement and transmit voting instructions. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail instead of the Notice, the proxy materials include a voting instruction card for the Annual Meeting. To vote electronically over the Internetinternet or by telephone, you should follow the instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other nominee.
If you are a beneficial owner and want to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting, you will need to ask your bank, broker or other nominee to furnish you with a legal proxy. You will not be able to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting without a legal proxy provided by your bank, broker or other nominee.
If you are a beneficial owner, you must follow the instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other nominee to revoke prior voting instructions. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not revoke your vote unless you obtain a legal proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee and you vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 4 |
2
QUORUM AND VOTING
Voting Stock. The Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“common stock”), is the only class of securities that entitles holders to vote generally at meetings of the Company’s stockholders. Each share of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote. Following the Annual Meeting, voting results will be tabulated and certified by the inspector of elections appointed by the Board and timely announced by the Company.
Record Date.Date. The record date for stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting will be the close of business on March 29, 2021.19, 2024. As of the record date, there were a total of 228,654,590222,535,258 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting.
Quorum and Adjournments. Adjournments. The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote generally in the election of directors at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting.
If a quorum is not present, a majority of the stockholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting have the power to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time, without notice other than an announcement at the Annual Meeting,as required by applicable law, until a quorum is present. At any adjourned Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the Annual Meeting as originally notified.
Vote Required. The votes required to pass each proposal is as follows:
Proposal | Required Vote for Approval | Broker Discretionary
| Impact of Abstentions | |||
ONE (Election of | The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote with respect to that director’s election (meaning that the number of the votes cast “for” a director’s election must exceed the number of the votes cast “against” that director’s election). | Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal.
Broker non-votes are not considered votes cast and do not affect the outcome. | Abstentions are not considered votes cast and do not affect the outcome. | |||
TWO (Ratification | The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to | Brokers have discretionary authority in the absence of timely instructions from their customers to vote on this proposal. As a result, there will be no broker non-votes with respect to this proposal. | Abstentions are treated as present and entitled to vote on the matter and will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. | |||
THREE (Advisory of Named | The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to
This advisory vote is not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board. However, the Compensation Committee and the Board will take into account the result of the vote when determining future executive compensation programs. | Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal.
Broker non-votes are not entitled to vote and do not affect the outcome. | Abstentions are treated as present and entitled to vote on the matter and will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. |
3
|
|
|
| |||
If your shares of common stock are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you will receive instructions from that holder of record that you must follow in order for your shares to be voted at the Annual Meeting. Brokers who hold shares in street name for customers are required to vote shares in accordance with instructions received from the beneficial owners.
Default Voting.Voting. A proxy card that is properly completed and submitted will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions on the proxy card. If you properly complete and submit a proxy card, but do not indicate any contrary voting instructions, your shares will be voted consistent with the Board of Directors’ recommendation as follows:
FOR the election of the five persons named in this proxy statement as the Board of Directors’ nominees for election as Class II Directors, each to serve until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders.
∎ | FOR the election of the three persons named in this proxy statement as the Board of Directors’ nominees for election as Class II Directors, each to serve until the 2027 annual meeting of stockholders (Proposal One). |
FOR the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2021.
∎ | FOR the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2024 (Proposal Two). |
FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.
FOR the approval of an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance to 450,000,000 shares.
∎ | FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC (Proposal Three). |
If any other business properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the meeting, your shares will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the holders of your proxy. The Board of Directors knows of no matters, other than those previously stated, to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 6 |
4
SUSTAINABILITY AND ESGBUSINESS OVERVIEW
At Targa (NYSE: TRGP) is a publicly traded Delaware corporation formed in October 2005. Targa is a leading provider of midstream services and is one of the largest independent midstream infrastructure companies in North America. We own, operate, acquire, and develop a diversified portfolio of complementary domestic midstream infrastructure assets.
Our Operations
We are engaged primarily in the business of:
∎ | gathering, compressing, treating, processing, transporting, and purchasing and selling natural gas; |
∎ | transporting, storing, fractionating, treating, and purchasing and selling natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) and NGL products, including services to LPG exporters; and |
∎ | gathering, storing, terminaling, and purchasing and selling crude oil. |
To provide these services, we striveoperate in two primary segments: (i) Gathering and Processing, and (ii) Logistics and Transportation (also referred to conduct our business safelyas the Downstream Business).
Our Gathering and with integrity, creating lasting benefitsProcessing segment includes assets used in the gathering and/or purchase and sale of natural gas produced from oil and gas wells, removing impurities and processing this raw natural gas into merchantable natural gas by extracting NGLs; and assets used for our stakeholders, including investors, lenders, customers, employees, business partners, regulators,the gathering and terminaling and/or purchase and sale of crude oil. The Gathering and Processing segment’s assets are located in the Permian Basin of West Texas and Southeast New Mexico (including the Midland, Central and Delaware Basins); the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas; the Barnett Shale in North Texas; the Anadarko, Ardmore, and Arkoma Basins in Oklahoma (including the SCOOP and STACK) and South Central Kansas; the Williston Basin in North Dakota (including the Bakken and Three Forks plays); and the communities in which we liveonshore and work. We are proud to be partnear offshore regions of the energy infrastructure that is delivering safe, reliable energy to industry, farmers,Louisiana Gulf Coast and communities across America.the Gulf of Mexico.
Our operations connect U.S.Logistics and Transportation segment includes the activities and assets necessary to convert mixed NGLs into NGL products and also includes other assets and value-added services such as transporting, storing, fractionating, terminaling, and marketing of NGLs and NGL products, including services to LPG exporters and certain natural gas supply and marketing activities in support of our other businesses. The Logistics and Transportation segment also includes the Grand Prix NGL Pipeline, which connects our gathering and processing positions in the Permian Basin, Southern Oklahoma and North Texas with our Downstream facilities in Mont Belvieu, Texas. Our Downstream facilities are located predominantly in Mont Belvieu and Galena Park, Texas, and in Lake Charles, Louisiana.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 7 |
SUSTAINABILITY AT TARGA
Targa Resources Corp. is one of the largest independent midstream infrastructure companies in North America. As a predominately natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL) supply to markets where there is growing demand for cleaner fuel and feedstocks. We believe that natural gas, NGLs and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) are part of the solution to reducing the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. Natural gas, NGLs, and LPG are playing a meaningful role globally in improving public health and the environment with about half of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions compared to coal combustion. The increasing use of natural gas has helped the U.S. lower its emissions even as the economy has grown over the last 15 years. Globally, where electricity is not available, the use of LPGs for fuel has a positive impact on the health and prosperity for local people in less industrialized nations.
Safety - At Targa, safety is a core value. We believe that “Zero is Achievable” and our goal is to operate and deliver our products without any injuries. We continually seek to maintain and deepen our safety culture by providing a safe working environment that encourages active employee engagement. To protect our employees, contractors, and surrounding community from workplace hazards and risks, Targa implements and maintains an integrated system of policies, practices, and controls.
Operational Excellence - We recognize that operating our assets, including thousands of miles of pipelines, natural gas processing facilities, and NGL fractionation and distribution facilities, is a great responsibility. Throughout our organization,focused energy infrastructure company, we are committed to maintaining our reputation as a responsible and operating ourreliable operator of critical energy infrastructure.
We strive to safely and reliably operate a strong and diversified portfolio of gathering, processing, logistics, and transportation assets. Our assets connect natural gas and NGLs to domestic and international markets as part of an integrated energy value chain that is designed to deliver affordable and reliable energy for everything from electricity, dependable home heating and cooling, transportation fuel, and products that touch lives every day.
Targa’s products help to provide necessary, affordable, reliable, and dependable sources of energy and feedstocks that meet the world’s growing energy demand. We believe that, for many in the world today, natural gas and NGLs help provide critical access to the infrastructure, employment, clean water and food, education, and healthcare that all people deserve. Our mission is to safely efficiently, anddeliver energy, including to energy-poor areas of the world, in ana more environmentally responsible manner. We invest each year in integrity management, maintenance,way, caring for and environmental programs. Wherever we operate, we strive to conduct our business with attention tobeing stewards of the environment and to manage risks to enable sustainable business growth.environment.
Integrity and CodeAs part of Conduct - Our actions are guided by Targa’s Code of Conduct, the overarching policy that empowers us to commit to ethics, integrity, and compliance. Targa’s Code of Conduct establishes the high standard of ethical conduct that our employees are expected to follow and outlines how everyday behavior is expected to align with our core values. We further reinforce our commitment through adherence to our policies and practices, as well as through Code of Conduct annual training.
Throughout our organization, we are committed to operating safely, with excellence and high integrity. This is a commitment that starts with and is maintained by our Board of Directors, where the full Board holds the senior management team accountable for implementing our sustainability and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) objectives, including through administration of the Company’s annual incentive program.
ESG and sustainability remain a core Board agenda item, with metrics and focus topics discussed at each quarterly meeting led by different members of the cross-functional team supporting our ESG efforts. Our performance on sustainability factors played a role in 2020 compensation decisions and will continue to play a role in the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of annual incentive compensation. To further develop and advance our goals and approachDirectors’ continued commitment to sustainability, Targa has a cross-functional sustainability working group comprised of leadership from our Environmental, Safety and Health, Operations, Engineering, Human
5
Resources, Legal, Supply Chain, Financial Accounting, Commercial, and Investor Relations departments. The coordinated efforts are led by our Senior Vice President of Sustainability and Environmental, Safety and Health (ES&H), who reports directly to our Chief Executive Officer. Our sustainability efforts are designed to generate attractive economic returns for our investors, while minimizing environmental and social impacts.
Furthermore, the Board has established a Sustainability Committee to assist the Board in overseeing our compliance with all laws, regulationsoversees environmental, social, and Company policies and procedures related to material ESGsustainability matters, including governance in relation to such matters, and overseeingmatters. One of the committee’s purposes is to oversee management’s process for establishing and implementing a strategy to integrate sustainability into various business activities of the Company, with the goal of creating long-term stakeholder benefits. The full Board of Directors also reviews the Company’s progress at each quarterly board meeting. Our CEO and Executive Management team, including our Senior Vice President of Sustainability, oversee the development, implementation, and reporting of our environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) practices, and facilitate our enterprise risk management (“ERM”) process with participation and oversight from the Board of Directors.
Our Performance
We continue to engage with our stakeholders regarding our ESG efforts, and are proud of the progress we have made.
First, across multiple safety metrics, Targa continues to achieve our best safety performance in years, due in large part to multiyear investment in and implementation of standardized processes and digital systems, training programs, and proactive work practices. In 2022, we achieved a 26% reduction in Total Recordable Incident Rate compared to 2021, completed more than 44,000 total safety and environmental training hours, and conducted 69 formal safety audits and investigations. We strive to make safety part of everything we do and who we are as a company; for example, although we recently acquired two new businesses, we still improved our overall safety record.
Additionally, Targa continues efforts to demonstrate on-going commitment to and leadership in methane management and limiting methane loss in our systems, which includes:
∎ | Committing to reduce our methane intensity to 0.08% for our gathering and boosting segment and to 0.11% for our processing segment by 2025 as part of our membership in Our Nation’s Energy Future (ONE Future), a goal we are already well on our way to meeting with a total company methane intensity performance of 0.087% as of December 31, 2022 compared to the ONE Future goal of 0.19%; |
∎ | Conducting aerial methane surveys for all of our assets, including twice in the Permian in 2023; |
∎ | Performing voluntary optical gas imaging for methane leak detection quarterly at all of our compressor stations and bi-monthly at all of our gas plants; |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 8 |
∎ | Creating a cross-functional Methane Team to study our operations, work with third-party power providers, and collaborate with engine manufacturers to reduce our methane emissions; |
∎ | Piloting continuous methane monitoring equipment at multiple facilities; |
∎ | Executing power purchase agreements for long-term solar and wind in the Permian; |
∎ | Installing additional electrical compression to displace the use of natural gas-fired compression as we continue to evaluate our total greenhouse gas emission reduction opportunities; |
∎ | Taking active leadership roles in ONE Future with a newly elected ONE Future Board member and Technical Committee co-chair; and |
∎ | Taking a proactive approach to mitigating flaring incidents by aiming to reduce flared volumes through a combination of strategic planning, collaboration, strong asset integrity and maintenance programs, and effective combustion techniques, while maintaining the safety and integrity of our operations. |
Further, even as we have acquired new assets, started up new gas plants, and added additional fractionation capacity, which all increased volumes on our systems, we have been able to keep our greenhouse gas (“GHG”) intensity at or below that of the previous year. Our Low Carbon Energy Ventures team is investigating new opportunities for Targa all the time, including renewable power and carbon capture and sequestration, and is exploring other ideas that complement our strengths.
As we look forward, we will continue to strive to improve our performance, conduct our business safely and with integrity, and create long-term stockholder value.lasting benefits for all of our stakeholders.
We invite you to review our recent Sustainability Report, which is available on the Company’s website at https://www.targaresources.com/sustainability.
2021 BUSINESS OVERVIEW
The transitionsustainability. However, please note that the content of Targathat report, and other materials on our website, are not incorporated into a fully integrated midstream company with scalethis proxy statement by reference. Additionally, we may provide information in this proxy statement that is not necessarily “material” under the federal securities laws for SEC reporting purposes, but that is informed by various ESG standards and asset diversity is complete, with 2020 representingframeworks (including standards for the key inflection point inmeasurement of underlying data), and the interests of various stakeholders, which may be impacted by matters outside of our corporate life cycle. Since early 2017, we placed in-service approximately $7 billioncontrol. This proxy statement also contains forward-looking statements, which may be impacted by many risks, including those identified on our most recently filed Form 10-K. Accordingly, the actual conduct of projects,our activities, including the Grand Prix NGL Pipeline (“Grand Prix”), onesetting and pursuit of the most strategic projects since our inception. We believe our assets are not easily replicated, are locatedany goals, strategies, priorities, and initiatives discussed and forecasted in many attractive and active areas of exploration and production activity and are near key markets and logistics centers. Grand Prix connects our gathering and processing positionsthis proxy statement, may differ materially in the Permian Basin, Southern Oklahomafuture. Our approach to setting, measuring and North Texas withreporting on various emissions metrics, including our downstream facilitiesemissions-related goals, may change in Mont Belvieu, Texas and further increases our competitive capabilities to provide reliable, integrated midstream services to customers. Over the longer term, we expect our growth willfuture as methodologies for such activities continue to evolve. Moreover, under current or future approaches to setting, measuring or reporting on various emissions metrics, we may not be driven byable to meet our integrated midstream service offeringgoals and the strong position of our quality assets which will benefit from production from shale plays and by the deployment of shale exploration and production technologies in both liquids-rich natural gas and crude oil resource plays that will also provide additional opportunities for our Downstream Business.targets.
As we look forward, the next phase for Targa is to optimize our existing asset base, and to continue to invest along our core integrated value chain.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 9 |
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
6
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors has nominated the following individuals for election as Class II Directors of the Company to serve for a three-year term to expire at the 20242027 annual meeting of stockholders:
Beth A. Bowman
∎ | Beth A. Bowman |
Lindsey M. Cooksen
∎ | Lindsey M. Cooksen |
Robert B. Evans
Joe Bob Perkins
Ershel C. Redd Jr.
∎ | Joe Bob Perkins |
Mses. Bowman and Cooksen and Messrs. Evans,Mr. Perkins and Redd are currently serving as directors of the Company. Their biographical information is contained in the “Directors and Executive Officers” section below.
The Board currently consists of twelve directors. As part of our ongoing Board succession planning, Director Ershel C. Redd Jr. will not stand for reelection and announced his retirement from the Board effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting. Mr. Redd’s decision not to stand for reelection was not the result of any disagreement with the Company or any of its affiliates on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices. Our bylaws provide that the number of directors will be determined by the Board of Directors, and the number of directors is currently set at twelve. We will reduce the number of directors to eleven following the Annual Meeting.
The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of its nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. If a nominee becomes unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election, either the number of the Company’s directors will be reduced or the persons acting via proxy will vote for the election of a substitute nominee that the Board of Directors recommends.
Our bylaws provide that in an uncontested election, each director will be elected by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote with respect to that director’s election (meaning that the number of votes cast “for” a director’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director’s election). Pursuant to our bylaws, each incumbent director nominated for election must submit an irrevocable resignation, contingent on (i) not receiving a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election, and (ii) acceptance of that proffered resignation by the Board of Directors in accordance with the following policies and procedures. In the event an incumbent director fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election, the Nominating and Governance Committee, or such other committee designated by the Board, will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors as to whether to accept or reject the resignation of such incumbent director, or whether other action should be taken. The Board of Directors will act on the proffered resignation, taking into account such committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision regarding the resignation and, if such resignation is rejected, the rationale behind the decision within ninety days following certification of the election results. Such committee, in making its recommendation, and the Board of Directors, in making its decision, each may consider any factors and other information that they consider appropriate and relevant. The director whose resignation is being considered will not participate in the deliberations of such committee or the Board of Directors with respect to whether to accept such director’s resignation. If the director’s resignation is not accepted by the Board of Directors, such director will continue to serve until his or her successor is duly elected, or until his or her earlier resignation or removal.
Vote Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote with respect to each director’s election is required to elect that director (meaning that the number of votes cast “for” a director’s election must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director’s election). If you own shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must instruct your bank, broker or other holder of record how to vote in order for them to vote your shares so that your vote can be counted on this proposal. Please see “Quorum and Voting—Vote Required” for further information regarding the impact of abstentions and broker non-votes.
Recommendation of our Board of Directors
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the election of each of the nominees.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 10 |
7
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
After the Annual Meeting, assuming the stockholders elect the nominees of the Board of Directors as set forth in “Proposal One—Election of Directors” above, the
The Board of Directors of the Company will be, and the executive officers of the Company are:
| |||||||||
Name | Age (1) | Position | |||||||
| |||||||||
Matthew J. Meloy | 46 | Chief Executive Officer and Director | |||||||
Patrick J. McDonie | 63 | President – Gathering and Processing | |||||||
D. Scott Pryor | 61 | President – Logistics and Transportation | |||||||
Robert M. Muraro | 47 | Chief Commercial Officer | |||||||
Jennifer R. Kneale | 45 | Chief Financial Officer | |||||||
| 64 | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | |||||||
| |||||||||
Julie H. Boushka | 61 | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer | |||||||
Paul W. Chung | 64 | Chairman of the Board of Directors | |||||||
Joe Bob Perkins | 63 | Director | |||||||
| |||||||||
Rene R. Joyce | 76 | Director | |||||||
Charles R. Crisp | 76 | Director | |||||||
| |||||||||
Ershel C. Redd Jr.(2) | 76 | Director | |||||||
Laura C. Fulton | 60 | Director | |||||||
Waters S. Davis, IV | 70 | Director | |||||||
| |||||||||
Beth A. Bowman | 67 | Director | |||||||
Lindsey M. Cooksen | 41 | Director | |||||||
R. Keith Teague | 59 | Director | |||||||
Caron A. Lawhorn | 63 | Director |
(1) | Ages as of |
(2) | Mr. Redd will not be standing for reelection and is retiring from the Board, effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting, and therefore will no longer be considered a member of the Board as of the date of the Annual Meeting. |
Matthew J. Meloyhas served as Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company andsince March 1, 2020. He also served as a director of Targa Resources GP LLC (the “General Partner”) of Targa Resources Partners LP (the “Partnership” or “TRP”) between March 2020 and May 2021. Mr. Meloy has also served as Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner since March 1, 2020. Mr. Meloy previously served asPresident of the Company and the General Partner between March 2018 and March 2020. Mr. Meloy also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the General Partner between May 2015 and February 2018. He also served as Treasurer of the Company and the General Partner until December 2015. Mr. Meloy previously served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company between October 2010 and May 2015 and of the General Partner between December 2010 and May 2015. He also served as Vice President—Finance and Treasurer of the Company between April 2008 and October 2010, and as Director, Corporate Development of the Company between March 2006 and March 2008 and of the General Partner between March 2006 and March 2008. He served as Vice President—Finance and Treasurer of the General Partner between April 2008 and December 15, 2010. Mr. Meloy was with The Royal Bank of Scotland in the structured finance group, focusing on the energy sector from October 2003 to March 2006. Mr. Meloy’s extensive knowledge of the Company’s operational and strategic initiatives and capital investment program, attained from his service as President for two years and Chief Financial Officer for eight years, combined with his experience in the finance industry, brings operational, financial and capital markets experience to the Board.
Patrick J. McDonie has served as President—Gathering and Processing of the Company and the General Partner since March 2018. Mr. McDonie previously served as Executive Vice President—Southern Field Gathering and Processing of the Company and the General Partner between November 2015 and February 2018. He also
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 11 |
served as President of Atlas Pipeline Partners GP LLC (“Atlas”), which was acquired by the Partnership in February 2015, between October 2013 and February 2015. He also served as Chief Operating Officer of Atlas
8
between July 2012 and October 2013 and as Senior Vice President of Atlas between July 2012 and October 2013. He served as President of ONEOK Energy Services Company, a natural gas transportation, storage, supplier and marketing company between May 2008 and July 2012.
D. Scott Pryor has served as President—Logistics and Transportation of the Company and the General Partner, since March 2018. Mr. Pryor previously served as Executive Vice President—Logistics and Marketing of the Company and the General Partner between November 2015 and February 2018. He also served as Senior Vice President—NGL Logistics & Marketing of Targa Resources Operating LLC (“Targa Operating”) and various other subsidiaries of the Partnership between June 2014 and November 2015. He also served as Vice President of Targa Operating between July 2011 and May 2014 and has held officer positions with other Partnership subsidiaries since 2005.
Robert M. Muraro has served as Chief Commercial Officer of the Company and the General Partner since March 2018. Mr. Muraro previously served as Executive Vice President—Commercial of the Company and the General Partner between February 2017 and February 2018. He also served as Senior Vice President—Commercial and Business Development of Targa Midstream Services LLC (“Targa Midstream”) and various other subsidiaries of the Partnership between March 2016 and February 2017. He also served as Vice President—Commercial Development of Targa Midstream and various other subsidiaries of the Partnership between January 2013 and March 2016. He held the position of Director of Business Development between August 2004 and January 2013.
Jennifer R. Kneale has served as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the General Partner since March 2018. She also served as Treasurer of the Company between September 2022 and April 2023 and of the General Partner between August 2022 and April 2023. Ms. Kneale previously served as Vice President—Finance of the Company and the General Partner between December 2015 and February 2018. She also served as Senior Director, Finance of the Company and the General Partner between March 2015 and December 2015. She also served as Director, Finance of the Company and the General Partner between May 2013 and February 2015. Ms. Kneale was with Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. in its energy private equity group, TPH Partners, from September 2011 to May 2013, most recently serving as Director of Investor Relations.2013.
Regina L. GregoryGerald R. Shrader has served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company and the General Partner since March 1, 2020. Ms. Gregory previouslyDecember 2023. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Shrader served as Vice President and Assistant General Counselin various roles with subsidiaries of the Company and the General Partner between May 2019 andbeginning in March 2020 and of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries between April 2019 and March 2020. From June 2017 until joining the Company in July 2018, she was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Frontier Midstream Services IV LLC. She also served2015, most recently serving as Senior Vice President, General CounselCounsel—Southern Field G&P and Corporate Secretary for the general partner of American Midstream Partners, LP during 2016 and 2017.those subsidiaries. Prior to that, she was General Counsel, Vice President,joining Targa, Mr. Shrader served as Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary of Traverse MidstreamAtlas Pipeline Partners LP inGP, LLC from October 2009 until March 2015 and, 2016prior to that time, served in various roles with affiliates of Atlas beginning in July 2007. Prior to Atlas, Mr. Shrader worked both for publicly traded energy companies and in private practice (including the general partner of Access Midstream Partners LP (previously Chesapeake Midstream Partners LP) from 2010 through 2015. Additionally, Ms. Gregory held a numberprovision of legal positions with different companies, including the law firms of Jones Dayservices to private and Fulbright & Jaworski (now Norton Rose Fulbright)publicly traded energy companies).
G. Clark White has served as Executive Vice President—Operations of the Company and the General Partner since September 2020 and served as Executive Vice President—Engineering and Operations of the Company and the General Partner between November 2015 and September 2020. Mr. White previously served as Senior Vice President—Field G&P of Targa Operating and various other subsidiaries of the Partnership between June 2014 and November 2015. He also served as Vice President of Targa Operating between July 2011 and May 2014 and has held officer positions with other Partnership subsidiaries since 2003.
Julie H. Boushka has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company and the General Partner since March 2019. Ms. Boushka previously served as Vice President—Controller of the Company, the General Partner and various subsidiaries of the Company between February 2017 and February 2019. She also served as Assistant Controller—Financial Accounting of the Company and the General Partner between November 2016 and February 2017. Ms. Boushka served as a Senior Vice President for Financial Planning and the Chief Risk Officer for Columbia Pipeline Group (“CPG”) between June 2015 and August 2016,
9
where she was responsible for the financial planning function and managing enterprise risk. She also served as the Business Unit Chief Financial Officer of CPG between May 2013 and June 2015, where she was responsible for the accounting and financial planning functions. Prior to that, Ms. Boushka spent approximately 18 years in various roles at El Paso Corporation (and its predecessor, Tenneco, Inc.), including accounting, financial reporting and business development.
Paul W. Chunghas served as a director and Chairman of the Board of the Company since January 1, 2021. Mr. Chung previously served as a director and Chairman of the Board of the General Partner sincebetween January 1,2021 and May 2021. From March 2020 until December 31, 2020, he served as Executive Vice President and Senior Legal Advisor of the Company. From May 2004 to March 2020, Mr. Chung served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company and its predecessor entities and of the General Partner since its formation. From 1999 to May 2004, he served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of various Shell Oil
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 12 |
Company (“Shell”) affiliates, including Coral Energy, LLC and Shell Trading North America Company. In these positions, Mr. Chung was responsible for all legal and regulatory affairs. From 1996 to 1999, he served as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of Tejas Gas Corporation (“Tejas”).Corporation. Prior to 1996, Mr. Chung held a number of legal positions with different companies, including the law firm of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. Mr. Chung’s knowledge of the Company, together with his background in the energy industry and his legal and regulatory experience, enable Mr. Chung to provide a valuable and distinct perspective to the Board on a range of business and management matters.
Joe Bob Perkins has served as a director of the Company and the General Partner since January 2012. Mr. Perkins previously served as Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company and the General Partner between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, and as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the General Partner between January 2012 and March 2020.2020, and as a director of the General Partner between January 2012 and May 2021. He also served as President of the Company between the date of its formation onin October 2005 and December 2011. Prior to 2005, Mr. Perkins served predecessor Targa companies as President since their founding in 2003. Prior to that, Mr. Perkins served in various leadership roles within the energy industry across several different companies, had employment experience with companies operating in both the midstream and upstream sectors, and was a management consultant with McKinsey & Company working primarily in energy. Mr. Perkins’ intimate knowledge of all facets of the Company, derived from his past services as Executive Chairman of the Board and as President and Chief Executive Officer, coupled with his broad experience in the energy industry, and specifically in the midstream sector, his engineering and business educational background, and his experience with the investment community, and experiences on other boards enable Mr. Perkins to provide a valuable and unique perspective to the Board on a range of business and management matters.
James W. Whalen Rene R. Joycehas served as a director of the Company since its formation in October 2005 and of the General Partner since February 2007. Mr. Whalen previously servedas Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company and the General Partner between January 2015 and March 2020. He also served as director of an affiliate of the Company during 2004 and 2005. Mr. Whalen previously served as Advisor to Chairman and CEO of the Company and the General Partner between January 2012 and December 2014. He served as Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company between October 2010 and December 2011 and of the General Partner between December 2010 and December 2011. He also served as President-Finance and Administration of the Company between January 2006 and October 2010 and the General Partner between October 2006 and December 2010 and for various Targa subsidiaries since November 2005. Between October 2002 and October 2005, Mr. Whalen served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Parker Drilling Company. Between January 2002 and October 2002, he was the Chief Financial Officer of Diversified Diagnostic Products, Inc. He served as Chief Commercial Officer of Coral Energy Holding, L.P. (“Coral”) from February 1998 through January 2000. Previously, he served as Chief Financial Officer for Tejas from 1992 to 1998. Mr. Whalen brings a breadth and depth of experience as an executive, Board member, and audit committee member across several different companies and in energy and other industry areas. His valuable management and financial expertise includes an understanding of the accounting and financial matters that the Company and industry address on a regular basis.
Rene R. Joyce has served as a director of the Company since its formation in October 2005 and of the General Partner since October 2006. Mr. Joyce previously served as Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company and the General Partner between January 2012 and December 2014.2014 and as a director of the General Partner between October 2005 and May 2021. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of the
10
Company between October 2005 and December 2011 and the General Partner between October 2006 and December 2011. He also served as an officer and director of an affiliate of the Company during 2004 and 2005 and was a consultant for the affiliate during 2003. Mr. Joyce isserved as a director of Apache Corporation.APA Corporation (NASDAQ: APA) between May 2017 and May 2021. Mr. Joyce served as a consultant in the energy industry from 2000 through 2003 providing advice to various energy companies and investors regarding their operations, acquisitions and dispositions. Mr. Joyce served as President of onshore pipeline operations of Coral Energy, LLC, a subsidiary of Shell from 1998 through 1999 and President of energy services of Coral, a subsidiary of Shell which was the gas and power marketing joint venture between Shell and Tejas, during 1999. Mr. Joyce served as President of various operating subsidiaries of Tejas, a natural gas pipeline company, from 1990 until 1998 when Tejas was acquired by Shell. As the founding Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Joyce brings deep experience in the midstream business, expansive knowledge of the oil and gas industry, as well as relationships with chief executives and other senior management at peer companies, customers and other oil and natural gas companies throughout the world. His experience and industry knowledge, complemented by an engineering and legal educational background, enable Mr. Joyce to provide the Board with executive counsel on the full range of business, technical, and professional matters.
Charles R. Crisp has served as a director of the Company since its formation in October 2005 and2005. He also served as a director of the General Partner sincebetween March 2016. He also served as2016 and May 2021 and a director of an affiliate of the Company during 2004 and 2005. Mr. Crisp was President and Chief Executive Officer of Coral Energy, LLC, a subsidiary of Shell, from 1999 until his retirement in November 2000, and was President and Chief Operating Officer of Coral from January 1998 through February 1999. Prior to this, Mr. Crisp served as President of the power generation group of Houston Industries and, between 1988 and 1996, as President and Chief Operating Officer of Tejas. Mr. Crisp is a director of EOG Resources Inc. (NYSE: EOG). He was also a director of Intercontinental Exchange Inc. (NYSE: ICE) from 2002 until May 2022 and Southern Company Gas (formerly known as AGL Resources Inc.), a subsidiary of The Southern Company EOG Resources Inc. and Intercontinental Exchange Inc.(NYSE: SO), from 2003 until April 2023. Mr. Crisp brings extensive energy experience, a vast understanding of many aspects of our industry and experience serving on the boards of other public companies in the energy industry. His leadership and business experience and deep knowledge of various sectors of the energy industry bring a crucial insight to the Board.
Chris Tong has served as a director of the Company since January 2006 and of the General Partner since March 2016. Mr. Tong served as a director of Kosmos Energy Ltd. from 2011 until September 2019. He served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Noble Energy, Inc. from January 2005 until August 2009. He also served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. from August 1997 until December 2004. Prior thereto, he was Senior Vice President of Finance of Tejas Acadian Holding Company and its subsidiaries, including Tejas Gas Corp., Acadian Gas Corporation and Transok, Inc., all of which were wholly-owned subsidiaries of Tejas. Mr. Tong held these positions from August 1996 until August 1997, and had served in other treasury positions with Tejas since August 1989. Mr. Tong brings a breadth and depth of experience as a chief financial officer in the energy industry, a financial executive, a director of other public companies and a member of other audit committees. He brings significant financial, capital markets and energy industry experience to the Board.
Ershel C. Redd Jr. has served as a director of the Company since February 2011 and2011. Mr. Redd previously served as a director of the General Partner sincebetween March 2016.2016 and May 2021. Mr. Redd has served as a consultant in the energy industry since 2008 providing advice to various energy companies and investors regarding their operations,
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 13 |
acquisitions and dispositions. Mr. Redd was President and Chief Executive Officer of El Paso Electric Company, a public utility company, from May 2007 until March 2008. Prior to this, Mr. Redd served in various positions with NRG Energy, Inc., a wholesale energy company, including as Executive Vice President—Commercial Operations from October 2002 through July 2006, as President—Western Region from February 2004 through July 2006, and as a director between May 2003 and December 2003. Mr. Redd served as Vice President of Business Development for Xcel Energy Markets, a unit of Xcel Energy Inc., from 2000 through 2002, and as President and Chief Operating Officer for New Century Energy’s (predecessor to Xcel Energy Inc.) subsidiary, Texas Ohio Gas Company, from 1997 through 2000. Mr. Redd brings to the Company extensive energy industry experience, a vast understanding of varied aspects of the energy industry and experience in corporate performance, marketing and trading of natural gas and natural gas liquids,NGLs, risk management, finance, acquisitions and divestitures, business development,
11
regulatory relations and strategic planning. His leadership and business experience and deep knowledge of various sectors of the energy industry bring a crucial insight to the Board.
Laura C. Fulton has served as a director of the Company since February 2013 and2013. Ms. Fulton previously served as a director of the General Partner since March 2016.between February 2013 and May 2021. Ms. Fulton has served as the Senior Vice President Financeand Chief Financial Officer of the American Bureau of Shipping since July 2021 and previously served as the Vice President of Finance from January 2020.2020 until July 2021. Ms. Fulton served as the Chief Financial Officer of Hi-Crush Proppants LLC from April 2012 until December 2019 and Hi-Crush GP LLC, the general partner of Hi-Crush Partners LP, from May 2012 until May 2019 and its successor, Hi-Crush Inc., from May 2019 to December 2019. OnDuring July 12, 2020, Hi-Crush Inc. and each of its direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (including Hi-Crush Proppants LLC) (collectively, “Hi-Crush”) filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code. OnDuring October 9, 2020, Hi-Crush’s Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization was confirmed. From March 2008 to October 2011, Ms. Fulton served as Executive Vice President, Accounting and then Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Services, LLC (“AEI”), an owner and operator of essential energy infrastructure assets in emerging markets. Prior to AEI, Ms. Fulton spent 12 years with Lyondell Chemical Company in various capacities, including as general auditor responsible for internal audit and the Sarbanes-Oxley certification process, and as the assistant controller. Prior to that, she spent 11 years with Deloitte & Touche in public accounting, with a focus on audit and assurance. As a chief financial officer, general auditor and external auditor, Ms. Fulton brings to the company extensive financial, accounting and compliance process experience. Ms. Fulton’s experience as a financial executive in the energy industry, including her positions with a publicly-traded company and master limited partnership, also brings industry and capital markets experience to the Board.
Waters S. Davis, IV has served as director of the Company since July 2015 and2015. Mr. Davis previously served as a director of the General Partner sincebetween March 2016. Mr. Davis has served2016 and May 2021 and as President of National Christian Foundation, Houston sincefrom July 2014.2014 until December 2020. Mr. Davis was Executive Vice President of NuDevco LLC (“NuDevco”) from December 2009 to December 2013. Prior to his employment with NuDevco, he served as President of Reliant Energy Retail Services from June 1999 to January 2002 and as Executive Vice President of Spark Energy from April 2007 to November 2009. He previously served as a senior executive at a number ofseveral private companies and as an advisor to a private equity firm, providing operational and strategic guidance. Mr. Davis also serves as a director of Milacron Holdings Corp. Mr. Davis brings expertise in the retail energy, midstream and services industries, which enhances his contributions to the Board.
Robert B. EvansBeth A. Bowman has served as a director of the Company since March 2016 and of the General Partner since February 2007. Mr. Evans is also a director of New Jersey Resources Corporation and One Gas, Inc. Mr. Evans was a director of Sprague Resources GP LLC until OctoberSeptember 2018. Mr. Evans was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy Americas, a business unit of Duke Energy Corp., from January 2004 until his retirement in March 2006. Mr. Evans served as the transition executive for Energy Services, a business unit of Duke Energy, during 2003. Mr. Evans also served as President of Duke Energy Gas Transmission beginning in 1998 and was named President and Chief Executive Officer in 2002. Prior to his employment at Duke Energy, Mr. Evans served as Vice President of marketing and regulatory affairs for Texas Eastern Transmission and Algonquin Gas Transmission from 1996 to 1998. Mr. Evans’ extensive experience in the gas transmission and energy services sectors enhances the knowledge of the Board in these areas of the oil and gas industry. As a former President and CEO of various operating companies, his breadth of executive experiences is applicable to many of the matters routinely facing the Partnership.
Beth A.Ms. Bowman has previously served as a director of the Company and the General Partner sincebetween September 2018.2018 and May 2021. Ms. Bowman has served as a director of Sprague Resources GP LLC, the general partner of Sprague Resources LP (“Sprague”), sincefrom October 2014 and she currently serves on the Audit Committee of Sprague.until November 2022. Ms. Bowman held management positions at Shell Energy North America (US) L.P. (“Shell Energy”) for 17 years until her retirement in September 2015. While at Shell Energy, she held the roles of Senior Vice President of the West and Mexico and later as the Senior Vice President of Sales and Origination for Shell’s North America business. Prior to joining Shell Energy, Ms. Bowman held management positions at Sempra Energy Trading and Sempra’s San Diego Gas & Electric utility in various areas including trading and marketing, risk management, fuel and power supply, regulatory, finance and engineering. Ms. Bowman also served on the board of the California Power Exchange and the board of the California Foundation of Energy and Environment from 2004 until 2015.
12
Ms. Bowman’s extensive energy industry background, including her experience in origination, commodities markets and risk management enhances the knowledge of the Board in these areas of the oil and gas industry.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 14 |
Lindsey M. Cooksen has served as a director of the Company andsince June 2020. Ms. Cooksen previously served as a director of the General Partner sincebetween June 1, 2020.2020 and May 2021. Ms. Cooksen has served as the founder and managing director of Cooksen Wealth, LLC, a wealth management firm, since April 2019. She previously held various positions with Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management (“Morgan Stanley”) from August 2009 to April 2019. While at Morgan Stanley she held the roles of Private Wealth Advisor, Family Wealth Director and Portfolio Management Director. She also previously worked for Citigroup Global Investment Bank between July 2005 and August 2007. Ms. Cooksen’s extensive corporate experience in the financial services industry, including wealth management and portfolio construction, tax planning and analysis and risk mitigation brings financial experience and an investor’s perspective to the Board.
R. Keith Teague has served as a director of the Company since February 2024. Mr. Teague served as the Chief Operating Officer of Tellurian, Inc. and its predecessors from October 2016 to July 2022. Prior to joining Tellurian Investments LLC, Mr. Teague served in various leadership roles at Cheniere Energy Inc. (“Cheniere”), including Executive Vice President, Asset Group from February 2014 to September 2016, Senior Vice President – Asset Group from April 2008 to February 2014, Vice President – Pipeline Operations from May 2006 to April 2008, and Director of Facility Planning from February 2004 to May 2006. From December 2001 to September 2003, Mr. Teague served as the Director of Strategic Planning for the CMS Panhandle Companies. He began his career with Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, where he managed pipeline operations and facility expansion projects. Mr. Teague previously served as a director on the Board of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: CQP), a publicly traded subsidiary partnership of Cheniere, from April 2008 to October 2016 and previously served on the Board of Directors for the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA), and the Board and Executive Committee of the INGAA Foundation. Mr. Teague’s engineering and business educational background, his experience on a publicly traded partnership Board, and his extensive project execution experience provide the Board with valued perspective related to energy infrastructure development and operations.
Caron A. Lawhorn has served as a director of the Company since March 2024. Ms. Lawhorn served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ONE Gas, Inc. (NYSE: OGS) from March 2019 until her retirement in December 2023. Prior to that role, Ms. Lawhorn served at OGS as Senior Vice President, Commercial, responsible for the commercial activities of OGS’ three natural gas distribution utilities, as well as overseeing the company’s information technology and cybersecurity function, from OGS’ separation from ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) into a standalone, publicly traded company in January 2014. Ms. Lawhorn served in the same role at OKE prior to the separation. Before that, she served as President of OKE’s natural gas distribution segment. From July 2009 until March 2011, she served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Planning and Development of OKE and ONEOK Partners, responsible for business development, strategic and long-range planning, and capital investment. Ms. Lawhorn became Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer for OKE in 2007, adding responsibility for ONEOK Partners in 2008. Prior to that, she served as Senior Vice President of Financial Services and Treasurer of OKE. Ms. Lawhorn joined OKE in 1998, after serving as a Senior Manager at KPMG and Chief Financial Officer of Emergency Medical Services Authority in Tulsa. She also serves a director of AAON, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAON), where she has chaired the audit committee since 2019. Ms. Lawhorn’s extensive background in various accounting, finance, operational and executive positions, including her experience as a financial executive of a publicly traded energy company, provides the Board with significant accounting and financial expertise. Additionally, Ms. Lawhorn’s previous experience in overseeing information technology and cybersecurity matters also provides the Board with valuable cybersecurity experience.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 15 |
Summary of Director Qualifications and Experience
This table provides a summary view of the qualifications and attributes of each director and director nominee.
Directors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Knowledge, Skills, Experience
| Knowledge, Skills, Experience |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounting | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business Operations | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital Management | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Governance Leadership | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cybersecurity | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Experience | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Expertise | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HR / Compensation | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Independence | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industry Experience | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal / Regulatory | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mergers & Acquisitions | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Public Company Board Experience | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk Management | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strategic Planning / Oversight | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demographic Background
| Demographic Background |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Targa Board Tenure (Years)1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Targa Board Tenure (Years) (1) | 5 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 8 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 13 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gender (Male / Female) | F | M | F | M | M | M | F | M | M | M | M | M | M | F | M | F | M | M | F | M | F | M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Race / Ethnicity
| Race / Ethnicity |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asian / Pacific Islander | • | ∎ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Black | • | ∎ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Caucasian / White | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | ∎ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hispanic / Latino | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Native American
|
(1)
(1) | As of the date of the Annual Meeting. Tenure calculated from the closing date of the Targa initial public offering. |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 16 |
Board Composition and Governance Highlights
92% Board Independence | 42% Board Diversity | |
Average Tenure = 7.5 Years(1) | Average Age = 63.4 | |
13
(1) | As of the date of the Annual Meeting. Tenure calculated from the closing date of the Targa initial public offering. |
96% Support on Say on Pay in 2023 | 100% Independent Audit, Compensation, and |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 17 |
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS
Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors currently consists of thirteentwelve members. The Board of Directors reviewed the independence of our directors using the independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and various other factors discussed under “Director Independence” and, based on this review, determined that Mses. Bowman, Cooksen, and Fulton and Lawhorn and Messrs. Chung, Crisp, Davis, Evans, Joyce, Perkins, Redd and TongTeague are independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards currently in effect. On February 26, 2024, Mr. Evans resigned from the Board. Mr. Redd will not be standing for reelection and is retiring from the Board, effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting. The Board held eleveneight meetings during 2020.2023. In addition, the independent members of the Board of Directors meet in executive session without the presence of the CEO or other members of management at least once annually. During 2020,2023, each of the directors that served on the Board of Directors during the year attended at least 75%100% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of meetings of all committees of the Board on which that director served.
Our directors are divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms. Class I, Class II and Class III directors will serve until our annual meetings of stockholders in 2023, 20212026, 2024 and 2022,2025, respectively. The Class I directors are Messrs. Chung, Crisp and WhalenTeague and Ms. Fulton, the Class II directors are Messrs. Evans, Redd (who is retiring from the Board and will not be standing for reelection) and Perkins and Mses. Bowman and Cooksen and the Class III directors are Messrs. Davis, Joyce and Meloy and Tong.Ms. Lawhorn. At each annual meeting of stockholders, directors will be elected to succeed the class of directors whose terms have expired. This classification of our Board of Directors could have the effect of increasing the length of time necessary to change the composition of a majority of the Board of Directors. In general, at least two annual meetings of stockholders will be necessary for stockholders to effect a change in a majority of the members of the Board of Directors.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee, Risk Management Committee and Sustainability Committee, and may have such other committees as the Board of Directors shall determine from time to time. Each of the standing committees of the Board of Directors has the composition and responsibilities described below.
Audit Committee
The members of our Audit Committee are Mses. Cooksen and Fulton, Lawhorn and Mr. Evans.Teague. Ms. Fulton is the Chairman of this committee. Our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that Mses. Cooksen and Fulton and Mr. Evans areeach of the members of the Audit Committee is independent as described in the rules of the NYSE and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Our Board of Directors has also determined that, based upon relevant experience, Ms. Fulton is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K.
This committee oversees, reviews, acts on and reports on various auditing and accounting matters to our Board of Directors, including: the selection of our independent auditors, the scope of our annual audits, fees to be paid to the independent auditors, the performance of our independent auditors and our accounting practices. In addition, theThe Audit Committee oversees our compliance programs relating to legal and regulatory requirements and our cybersecurity efforts and measures. Committee:
∎ | Oversees, reviews, acts on and reports on various auditing and accounting matters to our Board of Directors, including: the selection of our independent auditors, the scope of our annual audits, fees to be paid to the independent auditors, the performance of our independent auditors and our accounting practices; |
∎ | Oversees our compliance programs relating to legal and regulatory requirements; |
∎ | Reviews and acts on, as necessary, related party transactions, pursuant to our policies and procedures and applicable accounting standards; and |
∎ | Reviews our risk management program regarding enterprise-wide risks (including those associated with ESG policies, trends, and issues) and mitigants and reviews risks and initiatives relating to data privacy, cybersecurity and information technology. |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 18 |
We have adopted an Audit Committee charter defining the committee’s primary duties in a manner consistent with the rules of the SEC and NYSE that is posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance. The Audit Committee held four meetings during 2020.2023.
Compensation Committee
The members of our Compensation Committee are Messrs. Crisp, DavisMr. Teague and EvansMses. Cooksen and Bowman. Ms. Bowman. Mr. DavisBowman is the Chairman of this committee. This committee establishes salaries, incentives and other forms of compensation for officers, directors and other employees. This includes establishing our ESG-linked compensation program, which aims to align executive compensation with sustainability goals and targets, and assessing our ESG performance. Our Compensation Committee also administers our incentive compensation and benefit plans.plans, and oversees our clawback policy. We have adopted a Compensation Committee charter defining the committee’s
14
primary duties in a manner consistent with the rules of the SEC and NYSE that is posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance. The Compensation Committee held fourfive meetings during 2020.2023. Our Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Compensation Committee is (i) independent under the NYSE’s rules governing Compensation Committee membership; and (ii) a “non-employee director” under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act.
The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain, compensate, direct, oversee and terminate outside counsel, compensation consultants and other advisors hired to assist the Compensation Committee. In April 2020,May 2023, the Compensation Committee retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (the “Compensation Consultant” or “Meridian”) as its independent compensation consultant for matters related to executive and non-management director compensation. The Compensation Consultant reports to the Compensation Committee and does not provide any additional services to us.
In April 2020,May 2023, the Compensation Committee considered the independence of Meridian in light of SEC rules and the NYSE listing standards. The Compensation Committee requested and received a letter from Meridian addressing the consulting firm’s independence, including the following factors:
Other services provided to us by Meridian;
∎ | Other services provided to us by Meridian; |
Fees paid by us as a percentage of Meridian’s total revenue;
∎ | Fees paid by us as a percentage of Meridian’s total revenue; |
Policies or procedures maintained by Meridian that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest;
∎ | Policies or procedures maintained by Meridian that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; |
Any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and members of the Compensation Committee;
∎ | Any business or personal relationships between the individual consultants involved in the engagement and members of the Compensation Committee; |
Any stock of the Company owned by the individual consultants involved in the engagement; and
∎ | Any stock of the Company owned by the individual consultants involved in the engagement; and |
Any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and Meridian or the individual consultants involved in the engagement.
∎ | Any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and Meridian or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. |
The Compensation Committee discussed these considerations and concluded that the work of Meridian did not raise any conflict of interest.
Nominating and Governance Committee
The members of our Nominating and Governance Committee are Messrs. Crisp and Davis and Tong and Ms.��Fulton. Mr. CrispDavis is the Chairman of this committee. This committee identifies, evaluates and recommends qualified nominees to serve on our Board of Directors, develops and oversees our internal corporate governance processes and maintains a management succession plan. We have adopted a Nominating and Governance Committee charter defining the committee’s primary duties in a manner consistent with the rules of the SEC and NYSE that is posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance. The Nominating and Governance Committee held threefour meetings during 2020.2023. Our Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent under the NYSE’s rules governing board membership.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 19 |
In evaluating director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee assesses whether a candidate possesses the integrity, judgment, knowledge, experience, skills and expertise that are likely to enhance the Board’s ability to manage and direct the affairs and business of the Company, including, when applicable, to enhance the ability of committees of the Board to fulfill their duties.
Risk Management Committee
The members of our Risk Management Committee are Messrs. Joyce, TongPerkins and Whalen and Ms. Bowman. Ms. BowmanDavis. Mr. Perkins is the Chairman of this committee. This committee oversees our commodity price and commodity basis risk management and hedging activity.
15
The primary purpose of our commodity risk management activities is to hedge our exposure to price risk and to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in commodity prices on cash flow.
We have adopted a Risk Management Committee charter defining the committee’s primary duties that is posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance.
Sustainability Committee
The members of our Sustainability Committee are Ms. Cooksen and Messrs. Chung, Joyce and Crisp and Ms. Cooksen.Joyce. Mr. Chung is the Chairman of this committee. This committee oversees the Company’s materialenvironmental, social, and sustainability matters, including governance in relation to such matters.
The primary purpose of our Sustainability Committee is to assist the Board in overseeing our compliance with all laws, regulations and Company policies and procedures related to material ESGenvironmental, social and sustainability matters, including governance in relationour stakeholder engagement program as it relates to such matters,sustainability and to overseethe establishment and retention of a sustainable and diverse workforce. Our Sustainability Committee also oversees management’s process for establishing and implementing a strategy to integrate sustainability into various business activities of the Company to create long-term stockholder value.stakeholder benefits.
We have adopted a Sustainability Committee charter defining the committee’s primary duties that is posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 20 |
16
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board of Directors believes that sound governance practices and policies provide an important framework to assist it in fulfilling its duty to stockholders. The Company’s “Corporate Governance Guidelines” cover the following principal subjects:
∎ | Role and functions of the Board of Directors |
∎ | Qualifications and independence of directors |
∎ | Size of the Board of Directors and director selection process |
∎ | Our policy on the number of public company boards a director may serve on |
∎ | Role of Lead Independent Director |
∎ | Committee functions |
∎ | Meetings of non-employee directors |
∎ | Self-evaluation |
∎ | Ethics and conflicts of interest (a copy of the current “Code of Conduct” is posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance) |
∎ | Compensation of the Board of Directors |
∎ | Succession planning |
∎ | Access to senior management and to independent advisors |
∎ | New director orientation |
∎ | Continuing education |
The Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted on the Company’s website at www.targaresources.com/investors/corporate-governance. The Corporate Governance Guidelines will be reviewed periodically, and any proposed additions to or amendments of the Corporate Governance Guidelines will be presented to the Board of Directors for its approval.
The NYSE has adopted rules that require listed companies to adopt governance guidelines covering certain matters. The Company believes that the Corporate Governance Guidelines comply with the NYSE rules.
Board Leadership
Mr. Chung has served as Chairman of the Board of the Company’s Board of Directors since January 1, 2021 and served as Executive Vice President and Senior Legal Advisor of the Company between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020. Mr. Meloy has served as Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company since March 1, 2020. Although the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors are held currently by different individuals, our bylaws allow the same individual to hold the position of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors.
To further ensure a strong and independent board, the Board appointed Ms. Fulton as Lead Independent Director, and all directors of the Company, other than Mr. Meloy, are independent. Given the strong leadership of the Company’s CEO, the effective counterbalancing role of the Chairman, the strong Lead Independent Director, and a Board comprised of strong and independent directors, the Board believes that, at the present time, the current structure of the Board best serves the interests of the Company and its stockholders.
In his capacity as chair of the meetings of non-management directors, Mr. Chung provides, in conjunction with the CEO, leadership and guidance to the Board of Directors. He also (i) establishes the agenda for each meeting of the non-management directors and (ii) provides the Board’s guidance and feedback to the CEO and the Company’s management team. All directors are encouraged to suggest the inclusion of agenda items or revisions to meeting materials, and any director is free to raise at any Board meeting items that are not on the agenda for that meeting.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 21 |
In her capacity as the Lead Independent Director, Ms. Fulton (i) presides at executive sessions of the independent directors and has the authority to call additional executive sessions or meetings of the independent directors and (ii) presides at Board meetings of the non-management directors in the Chairman’s absence. The Lead Independent Director is available for consultation and direct communication with major stockholders, if requested.
The non-management members of the Board of Directors regularly meet in executive session without the presence of the CEO or other members of management. In addition, the independent members of the Board of Directors meet in executive session without the presence of the CEO or other members of management at least once annually. Mr. Chung is chair of meetings of the non-management directors and Ms. Fulton chairs the meetings of the independent directors.
Board Composition
It is the responsibility of the Nominating and Governance Committee to identify, evaluate and recommend to the Board of Directors nominees for election at the annual meeting of stockholders, as well as to fill vacancies or additions on the Board of Directors that may occur between annual meetings. Although the Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity or apply a strict “Rooney Rule” approach, the Committee considers a diverse pool of candidates for new member election to the Board of Directors, considering each candidate’s individual business and professional experience, demonstrated leadership ability, diversity, and acumen (financial, industry, technology, investor, ESG, and other specialized skills). We view and define diversity in a broad sense, which includes gender, ethnicity, age, education, industry/profession, experience, and leadership qualities. In assessing the composition of the Board of Directors, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee strive to achieve an overall balance of diversity of backgrounds and experience with a complementary mix of skills, viewpoints, and professional experience in areas relevant to the Company’s business and strategy.
When recommending director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee also considers and reviews each candidate’s business judgment, service on boards of directors of other companies and other time commitments, personal and professional integrity, including commitment to the Company’s core values, openness and ability to work as part of a team and willingness to commit the required time to serve as a board member and familiarity with the Company and its industry. In 2023, the Board implemented a policy on the number of public company boards a director may serve on. The policy, which can be found in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, states that Directors should not serve on more than three other boards of public companies in addition to the Company’s Board. The Chief Executive Officer should not serve on the boards of more than two other public companies in addition to the Company’s Board. Any exception requires a determination by the Board or the Nominating and Governance Committee that such service does not impair the director’s ability to effectively serve as a member of the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee has determined that, in its view, no director on the Board currently has time commitments that would prevent such director from properly discharging his or her duties as a director.
As part of our commitment to refresh our Broad and retain experienced individuals, we are pleased to have added two new qualified members to our Board, Mr. R. Keith Teague and Ms. Caron A. Lawhorn, in early 2024. We are proud of our efforts to maintain a board with diversity of experiences, perspectives and backgrounds. This commitment has seen the gender diversity on our Board rise from 10% to 33% over the past six years. We will continue to ensure that the benefits of increasing diversity are a central part of the Nominating and Governance Committee’s deliberations on potential appointments and included in the Board’s process for succession planning, including within our Board refreshment plans and part of our annual evaluation of Board effectiveness and composition.
When identifying potential director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee relies on any source available for the identification and recommendation of candidates, including current directors and officers and stockholders. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee from time to time may engage a third party search firm to identify or evaluate, or assist in identifying or evaluating potential candidates, for which the third party search firm will be paid a fee.
Communications with the Board of Directors
Stockholders or other interested parties can contact any director (including the Chairman of the Board, Mr. Chung, or the Lead Independent Director, Ms. Fulton), any committee of the Board of Directors, or our non-management
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 22 |
directors as a group, by writing to them at Targa Resources Corp., 811 Louisiana Street, Suite 2100, Houston, Texas 77002, Attention: Secretary. Comments or complaints relating to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will also be referred to members of the Audit Committee. The Secretary will review these communications and will forward any communications that they determine bears substantively on the business, management, or governance of the Company.
Director Independence
The Company’s standards for determining director independence require the assessment of directors’ independence each year. A director cannot be considered independent unless the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that he or she does not have any relationship with management or the Company that may interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment, including any of the relationships that would disqualify the director from being independent under the rules of the NYSE.
The Board of Directors has assessed the independence of each director and each nominee for director under the Company’s guidelines and the independence standards of the NYSE. The Board of Directors affirmatively determined that Mses. Bowman, Cooksen, Fulton and Lawhorn and Messrs. Chung, Crisp, Davis, Evans, Joyce, Perkins, Teague and Redd are independent. On February 26, 2024, Mr. Evans resigned from the Board. Mr. Redd will not be standing for reelection and is retiring from the Board, effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting.
Financial Literacy of Audit Committee and Designation of Financial Experts
The Board of Directors has determined that each of the Audit Committee members is financially literate and that the Chairman of the Audit Committee, Ms. Fulton, is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC.
Oversight of Risk Management
Except for the responsibilities of the Audit Committee discussed below, the Board of Directors as a whole (including the committees of the Board of Directors) oversees the assessment of major risks that the Company faces in the short-, intermediate- and long-term timeframe, and the management of such risks. For example, at least annually, the Board of Directors, including the committees of the Board of Directors:
∎ | reviews and approves the Company’s annual business plan and capital budget and reviews with management on at least a quarterly basis the Company’s financial performance, including any variations from the annual business plan and capital budget; |
∎ | oversees the Company’s enterprise risk management process; |
∎ | has established specific dollar limits on the commitment authority of members of senior management and requires Board approval of the Company’s capital expenditures and investments exceeding that authority; and |
∎ | monitors the Company’s hedging activities. |
The Company’s Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s assessment and management of financial reporting and internal control risks, as well as other risks such as the credit risks associated with counterparty exposure. The Audit Committee also oversees the Company’s data privacy, cybersecurity and information technology risks, as well as related key initiatives and action plans. Management and the Company’s external auditors report regularly to the Audit Committee on those subjects. The Company’s Sustainability Committee assists the Board of Directors in overseeing our ESG-related risks and environmental and safety performance. Given the strong leadership of the Company’s CEO, the effective counterbalancing role of the Chairman and a Board comprised of strong and independent directors, the Board believes that, at the present time, the current structure of the Board best serves the interests of the Company and its stockholders in overseeing and managing the Company’s major risks.
Attendance at Annual Meetings
While there is no formal attendance policy, the Board of Directors encourages all directors to attend the annual meetings of stockholders, if practicable. We anticipate that the majority of our directors will attend the Annual Meeting. All directors serving at the time attended the annual meeting of stockholders in 2023.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 23 |
Shareholder Engagement
We communicate with our shareholders through various platforms, including SEC filings, quarterly earnings calls and press releases, investor conferences, our sustainability report, and regular shareholder engagement meetings and calls. We regularly engage with our shareholders throughout the year to discuss our business strategy and performance, corporate governance, sustainability, executive compensation, and other topics. These engagements provide an important platform for Targa’s management team and Board of Directors to communicate business, sustainability, and other updates to shareholders and to receive feedback on key topics. Below is a graphical representation of our annual engagement practices with shareholders:
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 24 |
Our engagements with shareholders cover a variety of topics, including business strategy and performance, corporate governance, executive compensation, and ESG and sustainability-related matters, among other topics. These discussions typically include some combination of our CFO, General Counsel, SVP – Sustainability, SVP – Finance and Treasurer, VP – Finance and Investor Relations, and Board members. We receive important feedback from shareholders through these conversations that we report to our full Board of Directors. During our recent engagements with shareholders, Targa gained valuable feedback on key topics, including:
Overall Business | ∎ Shareholders provided positive feedback around the Company’s overall business strategy and execution. ∎ Shareholders positively highlighted our strong operational and financial performance, coupled with our strong balance sheet, which positions us to return increasing capital to our shareholders through a higher common dividend and share repurchases. | |
Executive Compensation | ∎ Shareholders expressed continued appreciation for our executive compensation practices and our commitment to engage with our shareholders on executive compensation. ∎ Shareholders appreciated that the majority of our compensation is in the form of at-risk variable pay with payouts tied to our performance through several strategic and financial objectives. | |
ESG | ∎ Shareholders positively received our expanded methane management plan disclosures and additional disclosure on our midstream flaring practices. ∎ Shareholders appreciated the publication of an updated version of our Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”) index on our website demonstrating the progress we have made on alignment of our disclosures with the recommendations of the TCFD. ∎ Shareholders also provided constructive feedback around our efforts towards advancing and enhancing our sustainability disclosures across each of the ESG pillars, including: – Our goals to reduce our methane intensity to 0.08% for our gathering and boosting segment and to 0.11% for our processing segment by 2025, which we remain on track to achieve; – Our continued focus on flaring reduction and our continued efforts with ONE Future and API on methane emissions, including working with engine manufacturers on methane slip; and – Our tying 10% of cash awards under our annual incentive compensation program to sustainability performance metrics. |
Fall 2023 Shareholder Engagement Efforts
2023 Annual Meeting Results: Prior to our shareholder outreach efforts, the Board and management team make it a priority to analyze the results of the annual meeting to gauge shareholder sentiment and identify topics to discuss with shareholders and solicit feedback on. When analyzing the results of the annual meeting, we noted that the shareholder proposal titled “Limit Supply Chain Flaring” saw 41.1% support. Although the proposal did not pass, the Board prioritizes being responsive to shareholders’ views and made a concerted effort to better understand their views on the proposal and related topics.
Engagement Efforts: As part of our commitment to ongoing shareholder engagement, we reached out in fall of 2023 to our top 30 shareholders, which represented approximately 64% of shares outstanding. In the fall of 2023 and into 2024, we engaged directly with shareholders representing approximately 56% of shares outstanding. We also reached out to two proxy advisors and engaged with both of them, and engaged with other investors outside of our top 30 investors. Two of our Directors, Waters S. Davis, IV and Lindsey M. Cooksen, also participated in a
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 25 |
number of the meetings. Targa’s management team and Board members discussed a variety of topics with shareholders, including those related to the shareholder proposal. Specifically, topics discussed included our methane management plan along with our coordination efforts with upstream operators and customers to reduce flaring.
Fall 2023 Shareholder Outreach Efforts
We contacted shareholders representing over | We met with shareholders representing approximately | |
What We Heard:
After thorough engagement and discussing the views of many shareholders on the shareholder proposal specifically, the primary feedback we heard on the proposal and related topics included:
∎ | Shareholders asked for additional disclosure around how we curtail upstream venting and flaring; |
∎ | Shareholders requested that we provide additional disclosure around our procedures to provide as much advance notice as practicable to upstream operators about potential outages or planned maintenance activities; |
∎ | Shareholders inquired about our coordination efforts with upstream operators on projected timing and volumes from new wells to secure takeaway capacity for when production begins; |
∎ | Shareholders expressed concerns with potentially setting reduction targets for our upstream partners and the potential negative financial impact that could have on our business; and |
∎ | Shareholders noted that the appropriate location for these disclosures was in our annual sustainability report. |
How We Responded: Following our extensive engagement process, it was very important to the Board and management team to demonstrate responsiveness to our shareholders’ views. Targa provided enhanced disclosure in our most recent sustainability report as a direct response to shareholder feedback. This enhanced disclosure included expanded disclosure on our methane management plan, which centers around the utilization of various detection technologies. We also disclosed additional details around our ongoing efforts to reduce flaring from unplanned and unexpected downtime. In addition, we provided more transparency into our communication practices with upstream customers.
We view the disclosures within our report as responsive to our shareholders’ feedback at this time, and remain committed to further regular engagement with shareholders to understand their views across a variety of topics. For additional information, we invite you to visit our most recent sustainability report which is available on the Company’s website at https://www.targaresources.com/sustainability. However, please note that the content of that report, and other materials on our website, are not incorporated into this proxy statement by reference. Additionally, we may provide information in this proxy statement that is not necessarily “material” under the federal securities laws for SEC reporting purposes, but that is informed by various ESG standards and frameworks (including standards for the measurement of underlying data), and the interests of various stakeholders, which may be impacted by matters outside of our control. This proxy statement also contains forward-looking statements, which may be impacted by many risks, including those identified on our most recently filed Form 10-K.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 26 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) reviews the elements and objectives of Targa’s executive compensation program and the decision-making process by our Compensation Committee in support of those objectives. We encourage you to read this CD&A in combination with the compensation tables that follow for context regarding the Compensation Committee’s 20202023 decisions on compensation for our Named Executive Officers (NEOs), as listed below.
| ||||||||
Executive Officers |
|
Matthew J. Meloy |
| |||||
| Chief Executive Officer (CEO) | |||||||
Jennifer R. Kneale | Chief Financial Officer (CFO) | |||||||
Patrick J. McDonie | President – Gathering and Processing | |||||||
D. Scott Pryor | President – Logistics and Transportation | |||||||
Robert M. Muraro | ||||||||
|
Chief Commercial Officer
|
Executive Summary
Growing EBITDA, Growing Dividend, Reducing Share Count, Strong Balance Sheet
As part of our leadership transition plan, Matthew J. Meloy became our CEO effective March 1, 2020 at which time Joe Bob Perkins, our former CEO, became Executive Chairman of our Board of Directors.
Effective January 1, 2021, Paul W. Chung, Executive Vice President and Senior Legal Advisor, retired from the management team and was elected as Chairmanone of the Board of Directors. Atlargest independent midstream infrastructure companies in North America, we are focused on delivering natural gas and NGLs from wellhead to domestic and global markets, helping to meet the same time, Joe Bob Perkins retired from his position as Executive Chairman and from the management team. Mr. Perkins continues to serve on the Board of Directors.
Some of the changes discussed in this CD&A regarding compensation opportunities for 2020 reflect this leadership transition and continued work by the Committee to ensure that compensation opportunities reflect market median practice for each of our NEOs.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2020 Business Environment
During 2020, global commodity prices declined due to factors that significantly impacted both supply and demand. As the COVID-19 pandemic spread and travel and other restrictions were implemented globally, theworld’s growing demand for commodities declined substantially. Additionally, certain major oil producing nations significantly increased their oilmore reliable and gas production late in the first quarter which further contributed to the surplus productionmore affordable fuels and feedstocks that help support higher global standards of commodities. Despite these nations subsequently agreeing to reduce global commodity supplies and global economies beginning to re-open, commodity prices remained weak relative to historical levels and continued to be volatile. Reduced economic activity due to the COVID-19 pandemic, combined with uncertainty around global commodity supply and demand, contributed to lower commodity prices. Furthermore, the decline in commodity prices led many exploration and production companies to reduce planned capital expenditures for drilling and production activities and also led to some companies shutting in wells primarily in the first half of 2020. While commodity prices remain low relative to historical levels and uncertainties associated with the impacts of COVID-19 continue, production from wells that were previously shut-in during the first half of 2020 across our operating areas has largely resumed and energy demand and commodity prices continued to recover compared to the first half of 2020.
In the first quarter of 2020, in a response to market conditions, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a reduction in the Company’s quarterly common dividend to $0.10 per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 from $0.91 per share in the previous quarter. This reduction provided
17
for approximately $755 million of additional annual direct cash flow, resulting in significant free cash flow available to reduce debt. Additionally, we meaningfully reduced capital spending. We continue to work through numerous internal initiatives to respond to current market conditions, including identifying and implementing cost reduction measures such as reducing or deferring non-essential operating and general and administrative expenses.
As a critical energy infrastructure operator, Targa prioritizes safety in all parts of our organization. In response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we moved early and quickly to protect the health and safety of our employees and are continuing to proactively manage our response to an evolving national and global situation. We activated and continue to operate under our Business Continuity Plan and took several additional strategic, proactive measures in response to information from the Centers for Disease Control and the local, state and national authorities to try to minimize the risk of business disruption and to protect our ability to deliver reliable services to our customers. Our Business Continuity Plan included:
Forming a critical response team of senior management in January 2020 to collaborate, review, and execute Targa’s business response to COVID-19
Proactively conducting a mandatory work-from-home drill for all non-field employees ahead of the stay-at-home orders issued by applicable governmental authorities
Preserving our workforce by providing our non-field employees with technology and equipment to perform their work duties remotely
Instituting social distancing practices and routine deep cleaning protocols at all facility locations to manage the spread of the virus
Equipping our facilities’ employees with personal face coverings
Continuing to provide leading customer service and reliable operations through enhanced facilities protocols, including limiting access to facilities by essential personnel, enabling social distancing, conducting jobsite safety meetings under social distancing protocols and encouraging virtual meetings rather than in-person meetings when possible
Engaging with our supply chain to review their capabilities and continuity of operations and service
Implementing plans for safely returning to offices over time
Our Board of Directors receives regular updates around preserving the well-being of our employees and continuity of Targa business operations as COVID-19 evolves.
Despite the challenges experienced during 2020, we remain focused in operating our infrastructure assets safely and protecting the health and safety of our employees.
2020 Performance Highlights
Our overall business performed well in 2020, led by our leadership position in the Permian Basin and our integrated NGL platform. Our full year average Permian natural gas inlet volumes increased 19% when compared to 2019, and drove increasing volumes through our Logistics and Transportation systems, demonstrating the strength of our integrated system. Grand Prix Pipeline throughput, and our fractionation and LPG export volumes all increased significantly over 2019.
Our full year net income (loss) for 2020 was ($1.5) billion compared to ($209.2) million for 2019. Our full year 2020 Adjusted EBITDA of $1.64 billion increased 14% over 2019 and we generated $575 million of free cash flow in the year. In 2020, increasing Adjusted EBITDA and reduced growth capital spending resulted in improving leverage metrics, and we exited 2020 with meaningfully lower leverage when compared to 2019. See Appendix A for a discussion of Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow, and reconciliations of such measures to their most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).
18
In 2020, we completed several major projects on time and on budget, including two processing plants in the Permian Basin, two fractionation trains in Mont Belvieu, the phased expansion of our LPG export capabilities (“LEP 3”), and the extension of our Grand Prix Pipeline into central Oklahoma. These expansions position Targa to benefit from increasing operating leverage moving forward.
living. We believe that our key strategic effortsexcellent operational performance, industry leading EBITDA growth outlook, identification of attractive investment opportunities, strong balance sheet and increasing return of capital to shareholders differentiate our company and mean we are well positioned now and for the future.
(1) | Based on estimated 2024 adjusted operating margin. |
(2) | Management expects to recommend to the Company’s Board of Directors an increase to the 2024 quarterly cash common dividend to $3.00 per share annualized. |
2023 Business Environment
Targa’s excellent performance drove record financial and operational metrics across a challenging business environment in 2023, highlighting the strength and resiliency of Targa’s strategy and business model. Commodity prices were lower in 2023 and volatility continued in global markets. Global events continued to underscore the critical nature of safe, reliable and affordable fossil fuels to support everyday life domestically and around re-contracting to add fees inthe world. Volume growth across Targa’s assets, highlighted by record Permian Gathering and Processing reducing growth capital spending, identifying opportunitiesvolumes driving record volumes through our NGL transportation, fractionation and export assets, continues to reduce operating and general and administrative expenses, reducing our dividend, and focusing on integrated opportunities position us forsupport the thesis that the Permian is a successful 2021 and beyond.
Shareholder Outreachglobally cost-advantaged supply basin.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 27 |
With decades of producer drilling expected within our areas of operation and the necessity of additional infrastructure to support our customers, we continued to invest in attractive organic growth projects, bringing major projects online on-time and on-budget, despite a business environment challenged by supply chain constraints and the continued impacts of inflation.
2023 Performance Highlights
(1) | Reported Permian natural gas inlet volumes. |
(2) | Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Please see the section of this proxy statement entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a discussion of adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of such measure to its most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. |
Track Record of Growth
Increasing volume trajectory through Targa’s difficult to replicate integrated NGL infrastructure footprint
(1) | Operational metrics represent average annual volumes. |
(2) | Targa’s Grand Prix NGL Pipeline commenced full operations during third quarter of 2019. |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 28 |
Track Record of Growth Driving an Increasing Return of Capital to Shareholders
Integrated NGL business and strong business fundamentals drive increasing cash flow outlook and return of capital
(1) | Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. Please see the section of this proxy statement entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a discussion of adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of such measure to its most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. Adjusted EBITDA growth based on midpoint of projected estimated 2024 Adjusted EBITDA range compared to 2019 Adjusted EBITDA. |
(2) | Management expects to recommend to the Company’s Board of Directors an increase to the 2024 quarterly cash common dividend to $3.00 per share annualized. |
Strong Investment Grade Balance Sheet Supported by Increasing G&P Fee Margin
Targa’s Gathering and Processing business has undergone a significant transformation in adding fees and fee floors to contracts
~90% Fee-Based Volumes in G&P Exiting 2023 | ∎ In 2023, we continued to add fees and fee floors to contracts in our Gathering and Processing business to reduce exposure to downside commodity prices. ∎ Exiting 2023, ~90% of our G&P volumes are fee-based or have fee floors. ∎ Adding fees and fee floors to G&P contracts has been a large multi-year strategic initiative across our organization and we are proud of our organization’s execution. |
Other 2023 Performance Highlights
∎ | Strong safety performance. |
∎ | Major projects came online on-time, on-budget and highly utilized at start-up (Legacy II plant, Midway plant, Galena Park export expansion, Greenwood plant, and Wildcat II plant). |
∎ | Current major projects in process progressing well (three G&P processing plants, two Targa fractionators, GCF fractionator re-start and Daytona NGL pipeline). |
∎ | Successfully executed the full integration of our Q2 and Q3 2022 acquisitions in South Texas and Permian Delaware. |
∎ | Sustainability ratings upgrade by MSCI from BB to AA. |
∎ | Ended 2023 on positive outlook from Fitch, S&P and Moody’s, positioning Targa for its February 2024 upgrade to BBB by S&P. |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 29 |
∎ | Higher year-over-year return of capital to our shareholders through both an increased common dividend and record common share repurchases. |
Shareholder Outreach
∎ | We regularly meet with our shareholders to discuss business topics, seek feedback on our performance, and address other matters such as executive |
∎ | ||||||
|
|
| ||||
These discussions typically include some combination of our |
∎ | Our say-on-pay vote has been strong over the past three years, with support in excess of 95% in 2021, 2022 and 2023. |
∎ |
|
| ||||
With a desire to broaden our perspective and improve our communications related to executive compensation, governance, ESG, sustainability and related matters, we |
|
|
2022 Outreach | 2023 Outreach | |
|
| |
Top 25 represented 63%of
| Top 30 represented 64%of
| |
16meetings conducted | 24meetings conducted | |
Say on
| Say on 96%
|
During our 2023 outreach, our shareholders generally expressed support for the design and administration of our current programs, and our program was further endorsed by the results of the say-on-pay advisory vote conducted in 2023. Our Compensation Committee will continue to consider improvements to our programs in light of shareholder feedback, changing industry conditions, and evolving best practices.
19
|
|
20202023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM SNAPSHOT
Compensation Philosophy and Guiding Principles
The philosophy underlying our executive compensation program is to employ the best leaders in our industry to ensure we execute on our business goals, promote both short-and long-term profitable growth of the Company and create long-term shareholder value. As such, our program is grounded in the following principles:
Competitiveness. Our executive compensation program should enable us to attract and retain key executives by providing a total compensation program that is competitive with the market where we compete for executive talent, which encompasses not only diversified midstream companies but also other companies in the energy industry.
Performance Accountability. Our executive compensation program should ensure an alignment between our strategic, operational and financial performance and the total compensation received by our NEOs. This includes providing compensation for performance that reflects individual and company performance both in absolute terms and relative to our Peer Group.
Shareholder Alignment. Our executive compensation program should ensure a balance between short-term and long-term compensation while emphasizing at-risk or variable compensation. Performance-based compensation acts as a valuable means of supporting our strategic goals and business objectives and aligning the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders.
∎ | Competitiveness. Our executive compensation program should enable us to attract and retain key executives by providing a total compensation program that is competitive with the market where we compete for executive talent, which encompasses not only diversified midstream companies but also other companies in the energy industry. |
∎ | Performance Accountability. Our executive compensation program should ensure an alignment between our strategic, operational and financial performance and the total compensation received by our NEOs. This includes providing compensation for performance that reflects individual and company performance both in absolute terms and relative to our Peer Group. |
20
∎ | Shareholder Alignment. Our executive compensation program should ensure a balance between short-term and long-term compensation while emphasizing at-risk or variable compensation. Performance-based compensation acts as a valuable means of supporting our strategic goals and business objectives and aligning the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders. |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 30 |
Good Governance Foundation
The following practices and policies in our executive compensation program promote sound compensation governance and align the interests of our shareholders and executives:
What We Do |
What We Don’t Do | ||
ü Use a combination of absolute and relative performance metrics in incentive plans
ü Maintain a comprehensive clawback policy aligned with current industry
ü Complete an annual compensation risk assessment
ü Maintain executive and director share ownership guidelines
ü Retain an independent consultant to advise the Committee | × No employment contracts × No single-trigger change-in-control severance arrangements × No single-trigger change-in-control vesting for NEO equity × No excise tax gross-ups × No material perquisites or supplemental benefits not generally available to other employees × No hedging or × No executive compensation practices that promote excessive risk |
* Implemented in 2019
** Implemented in 2020
Elements of Pay
The following principle pay elements support the grounding principles of our program:
|
| |||||||
Element |
| Guiding Principles | ||||||
Accountability | Alignment | |||||||
Base Salary |
∎ Critical factor in attracting and retaining qualified talent | |||||||
Annual Incentives |
∎ Tied to achievement of key financial, operational, and strategic objectives | |||||||
Incentives |
– 50% Performance share units (PSUs)
– 50% Restricted stock units (RSUs)
∎ Ties a majority of NEO compensation to creation of long-term value and encourages NEOs to build meaningful equity ownership stakes
|
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 31 |
21
Pay Mix
Emphasis on at-risk variable compensation.We remain committed to our emphasis on at-risk, incentive-based pay – with payouts tied to our performance through several strategic and financial objectives including relative TSR, and realizable pay heavily dependent upon our ability to grow shareholder value. The charts below show the mix of total direct compensation of our CEO and our other NEOs for 2020.2023. These charts illustrate that a majority of NEO total direct compensation is at-risk (91% (90% for our CEO and an average of 82%82% for our other NEOs).
Target Total Direct Compensation Mix
CEO Pay at a Glance
Realizable pay aligned with performance.Our emphasis on at-risk, variable and performance-based pay elements, particularly equity incentives, helps to ensure actual compensation realized by our NEOs aligns with returns to our shareholders. As shown in the charts below, CEO realizable pay over the past threethree- and five yearfive-year periods has aligned closely with our total shareholder return performance.
Target compensation is the sum of base salary, target bonus opportunity, and reported grant-date value of equity awards in each year. Realizable compensation includes base salary, actual annual cash incentive earned, and the value of any equity incentive grants valued based upon the period-ending stock price.price and target PSU payouts based upon relative performance. For our annual comparison of realizable pay to TSR performance, the applicable stock price is thecalculated as of December 31st31st of each year. For our three-year cumulative summary, the applicable stock price is the closing price on
22
December 31, 2020.2023. Any performance award granted and settled within the five-year or three-year period covered havehas been adjusted for actual payout percent. Awards that are still outstanding have been valued assuming a target payout. Note that the “realizable pay” calculations within this CD&A are not intended to be calculated in accordance with the SEC’s rules regarding “compensation actually paid” within the section below titled “Pay versus Performance.”
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 32 |
OUR DECISION MAKING PROGRESSPROCESS
The Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee oversees the executive compensation program for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of the Board. The Compensation Committee works very closely with its independent consultant and senior management to examine the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program throughout the year. Details of the Compensation Committee’s authority and responsibilities are specified in the Compensation Committee’s charter, which may be accessed at our website, www.targaresources.com, by clicking “Investors,” and then “Corporate Governance.”
The Role of Senior Management
Members of our senior management team attend regular meetings where executive compensation, Company and individual performance, and competitive compensation levels and practices are discussed and evaluated. The Executive Chairman andOur CEO review theirreviews his recommendations pertaining to NEO pay with the Compensation Committee, providing transparency and oversight. The Executive Chairman and CEO dodoes not participate in the deliberations of the Compensation Committee regarding theirhis own compensation. The members of the Compensation Committee make all final determinations regarding CEO and NEO compensation.
The Role of the Independent Consultant
The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage and retain an independent compensation consultant to provide independent counsel and advice. At least annually, the Compensation Committee formally conducts an evaluation as to the effectiveness of the independent compensation consultant and periodically requests proposals from other potential consulting firms to ensure the independent compensation consultant is meeting itsthe Compensation Committee’s needs. During 2019 and early 2020, the Compensation Committee retained the services of Pearl Meyer and Partners (Pearl Meyer). The primary consultant supporting the Committee left Pearl Meyer during 2020 and in July 2020,2023, the Compensation Committee retained the services of Meridian Compensation Partners (Meridian) as its independent compensation consultant with the same primary consultant for matters related to executive and non-management director compensation for the remainder of 2020 and for 2021.compensation.
The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of both Pearl Meyer and Meridian in 2020 as required under NYSE listing rules. The Compensation Committee has also considered and assessed all relevant factors, including but not limited to those set forth in Rule 10C-1(b)(4)(i) through (vi) under the Exchange Act, that could give rise to a potential conflict of interest with respect to the compensation consultants described above.Meridian. Based on this review, we are not aware of any conflicts of interest raised by the work performed by either firmMeridian that would prevent the consultantsconsultant from serving as an independent advisor to the Compensation Committee.
The Role of Market References in Setting Compensation
For purposes of setting compensation levels for 2020,2023, the Compensation Committee worked with its independent compensation consultant to review market data from our peers and from broader market survey sources to provide a reference and framework for decisions about the base salary and target annual and long-term incentives for each NEO. The Compensation Committee considers this information carefully and generally desires to be competitive approximately at the market median for total compensation opportunities, although we do not formally benchmark any item of compensation to a specific level compared to our peers. Consequently, in setting pay levels of our NEOs, the
23
Committee considers a variety of additional factors, including individual performance, competencies, skills, potential, prior experience, scope of responsibility and accountability within the organization.
Compensation Peer Group
For purposes of setting compensation levels for 2020, and in connection with our goal to improve our compensation programs, during 20192023, the Compensation Committee worked closely with Pearl MeyerMeridian and senior management to develop a representative peer group. The 20202023 compensation peer group, which was the same as our 2022 compensation peer group, consisted of a mix of 18 midstream and exploration and production companies.companies of similar financial size that we believe are a reasonable reflection of the market in which we compete for executive talent.
33 |
2023 Compensation Peer Group | ||||
APA Corporation |
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | NuStar Energy L.P. | |||
Cheniere Energy, Inc. | EnLink Midstream Partners, L.P. | ONEOK, Inc. | ||
Crestwood Equity Partners, L.P.(1) | Equitrans Midstream Corporation | Ovintiv, Inc. | ||
Devon Energy Corporation | Kinder Morgan, Inc. | Pioneer Natural Resources Company | ||
Diamondback Energy, Inc. | Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P.(2) | Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. | ||
Energy Transfer Equity LP | Marathon Oil Corporation | Williams Companies, Inc. |
(1) | Crestwood Equity Partners LP was acquired by Energy Transfer LP in a transaction that closed on November 3, 2023. |
(2) | Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. was acquired by ONEOK, Inc. in a transaction that closed on September 25, 2023. |
Targa Percentile Rank vs. Peers – Key Financial Measures (1) | ||||
Annual revenues
| Total Assets
| Enterprise Value | ||
68th percentile | 41st percentile | 52nd percentile |
(1) | As presented to the Compensation Committee in |
The Compensation Committee reviews the composition of our peer group every year with its independent consultant in order to ensure that the companies in the group continue to reflect an appropriate reference point for NEO compensation at Targa.
20202023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM IN DETAIL
Base Salary
In February 2020, theThe Compensation Committee authorizedapproved adjustments to base salaries for the NEOs for 2023 based on its assessment of the compensation market, expected salary increases across the midstream sector, and projected salary adjustments for all of the NEOs (other than the Executive Chairman) in order to recognize changing roles and to align more closely with competitive market practice. In May 2020, as part of Company-wide cost-cutting efforts in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and lower commodity prices, the CEO salary was reduced 15%, the other NEO salaries were reduced by 10% and the Board of Directors cash retainers were reduced by 10%. Based upon stronger-than-expected Adjusted EBITDA performance and improved business conditions, in October 2020 the Committee approved restoration of these temporary reductions.employees within Targa.
24
The 20202023 base salary rates for our NEOs were as follows:
NEO | 2019 Salary | March 1, 2020 Salary | May 16, 2020 Reduced Salary | October 31, 2020 Salary | Percent Change 2019 to October 2020 |
Year End 2022 Salary
|
Year End 2022 Salary
|
Year End 2023 Salary
|
Year End 2023 Salary
|
Percent Change 2022 to 2023
|
Percent Change 2022 to 2023
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Perkins | $ | 900,000 | $ | 750,000 | $ | 675,000 | $ | 750,000 | -17% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meloy | 600,000 | 875,000 | 743,800 | 875,000 | 46% | $ 900,000 | $ 900,000 | $ 985,000 | $ 985,000 | 9% | 9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Kneale | 400,000 | 575,000 | 517,500 | 575,000 | 44% | 600,000 | 600,000 | 635,000 | 635,000 | 6% | 6% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
McDonie | 500,000 | 525,000 | 472,500 | 525,000 | 5% | 540,000 | 540,000 | 615,000 | 615,000 | 14% | 14% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pryor | 500,000 | 525,000 | 472,500 | 525,000 | 5% | 540,000 | 540,000 | 615,000 | 615,000 | 14% | 14% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Muraro | 500,000 | 525,000 | 472,500 | 525,000 | 5% | 540,000 | 540,000 | 615,000 | 615,000 | 14% | 14% |
Changes in base salary for Mr. Perkins, Mr. Meloy and Ms. Kneale in 2020 are largely reflective of changes in roles as part of our leadership transition.
Mr. Perkins’ base salary decrease reflects his transition to the Executive Chairman role effective March 1, 2020
Mr. Meloy’s base salary increase reflects the significant expansion of responsibilities he has assumed upon becoming CEO on March 1, 2020
Ms. Kneale’s base salary increase reflects the multi-year transition of her compensation to a level closer to similarly situated officers in connection with her appointment as Chief Financial Officer on March 1, 2018
March 2021 salaries for our NEOs are unchanged from those shown above, except for Mr. Perkins who is no longer an NEO.
Annual Incentives
For 2020,2023, our NEOs were eligible to receive annual incentive awards under the 20202023 Annual Incentive Compensation Program which consists of cash awards under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2020“2023 Bonus Plan”), which was approved by the Compensation Committee in January 2020.March 2023.
Target Bonus Amounts.Target bonus opportunities are expressed as a percentage of base salary and were established based on the NEO’s level of responsibility and ability to impact overall results. The Compensation Committee also considers market data in setting target bonus amounts. The 20202023 target bonus opportunities were as follows:
NEO | 2020 Target (% of Salary) | 2020 Target ($) | ||||
Joe Bob Perkins | 125% | $ | 937,500 | |||
Matthew J. Meloy | 200% | 1,750,000 | ||||
Jennifer R. Kneale | 100% | 575,000 | ||||
Patrick J. McDonie | 100% | 525,000 | ||||
D. Scott Pryor | 100% | 525,000 | ||||
Robert M. Muraro | 100% | 525,000 |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 34 |
The 2021 target bonus opportunities for our current NEOs are unchanged from 2020.
NEO
|
2023 Target Bonus
|
2023 Target Bonus
| ||
Matthew J. Meloy
|
175%
|
$ 1,723,750
| ||
Jennifer R. Kneale
|
125%
|
793,750
| ||
Patrick J. McDonie
|
100%
|
615,000
| ||
D. Scott Pryor
|
100%
|
615,000
| ||
Robert M. Muraro
|
100%
|
615,000
|
20202023 Bonus Plan Funding Levels. Annual bonus awards are based upon a rigorous evaluation of results across a variety of financial, operational and strategic categories. Performance is measured against a combination of:
Pre-established financial and operational goals; and
Key strategic business priorities.
∎ | Pre-established financial and operational goals; and |
25
∎ | Key strategic business priorities. |
Plan funding incorporates formulaic quantitative evaluation and qualitative evaluation based on a holistic evaluation by the Compensation Committee. We believe this balance of formulaic and qualitative evaluation is critical, reflecting the complexity of our business and our desire to ensure that decision-making over the short-term remains focused on producing sustainable growth over the long term.
Evaluation of 20202023 Performance.Our evaluation of performance in the annual incentive program includes consideration of performance on multiple factors within three general categories and with a safety category overlay:
Category |
What did it |
Why is it | ||||
Financial Performance |
∎ Adjusted EBITDA
∎ Distributable cash flow per share ∎ % of G&P volumes with fees or fee-based floors | Adjusted EBITDA, Distributable Cash Flow per share, and commodity prices. | ||||
Operational and Commercial Performance |
∎ Project and commercial execution |
Emphasizes the importance of opportunities supporting our wellhead to water strategy, while continuing to be disciplined in our cost management. | ||||
Sustainability |
|
We strive to conduct our business sustainably, safely and with integrity, creating lasting benefits for our stakeholders, including investors, lenders, customers, employees, business partners, regulators and the communities in growth. | ||||
Safety |
∎ A holistic scorecard including quantitative and qualitative evaluation of incident rates, severity, process improvement, and other safety-related items
∎ Operates outside plan as a modifier that can reduce plan payout if performance is below expectations, but will not be used to increase plan payouts | We prioritize safety everywhere in our organization and believe that “Zero is Achievable” – to operate and deliver our products without any injuries. Our philosophy stresses critical nature of safe operations and reinforces |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 35 |
26
The table below provides the more specific items within the first three general categories that our Compensation Committee used when setting and determining the 20202023 bonuses. Adjusted EBITDA and DCF per share goals were set at more challenging levels relative to 2022 goals and actual performance. Cost discipline goals were set at a higher level than 2022 reflecting expectations for growth and inflationary pressure. Continuing to restructure or add contracts that increased the percentage of G&P volumes with fees or fee-based floors was an important strategic goal for 2023 to increase cash flow stability and reduce volatility to downside commodity prices. Financial performance metrics have a maximum payout factor of 2.5 and operational performance metrics and sustainability metrics have a maximum payout factor of 2.0. The total plan is capped at a factor of 2.0 regardless of scoring for the individual components.
Category |
Priorities |
Achievements |
Score | ||||||||
Financial Performance (60%) | Adjusted EBITDA* | Threshold: $3,138 – Target $3,487 – Max: $4,010 Actual performance: $3,530 million Adjusted EBITDA in 2023 was a record for Targa and 22% higher than 2022, driven by record Permian G&P, NGL transportation, fractionation and export volumes. Commodity prices were significantly lower than forecasted plan, but downside volatility was mitigated by fees and fee floors in G&P contracts. G&A and operating expenses were higher largely driven by higher labor, maintenance and rental costs from increased activity and system expansions, acquisitions and inflation. | 1.12 | ||||||||
Distributable cash flow per share | Threshold: $10.56 – Target: $11.73 – Max: $13.49 Actual performance: $11.76 Record adjusted EBITDA and a successful common share repurchase program that reduced common shares outstanding drove record DCF per share in 2023, although it was lower than initial expectations driven largely by higher than forecasted cash interest expense and maintenance capital expenditures. Cash interest expense was higher from floating interest rates on borrowings on our revolving credit facility, commercial paper program, accounts receivable securitization facility and term loan being higher than forecasted. Maintenance capital expenditures were higher from our growing infrastructure footprint and inflationary pressures.
|
| 1.02 |
| |||||||
% of G&P volumes with fees or fee-based floors | Threshold: 70% – Target 75% – Max: 85% Actual performance: 81% for FY 2023, and contractrestructurings completed prior to year-end resulted in ~90% as of YE 2023 Our commercial teams focused on identifying opportunities to add fees and fee floors to both new G&P contracts and restructure existing contracts to increase cash flow stability and minimize downside commodity price exposure. For 2023, aggressive goals were set organizationally to make significant progress in restructuring certain key existing contracts. Across 2023, we successfully added new contracts and restructured existing contracts, and in December 2023, we successfully restructured key existing contracts to finish year-end with ~90% of our G&P volumes under fee based or fee floor contracts.
|
| 2.00 |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 36 |
Category
|
|
Achievements
| Score | |||||
Operational and Commercial Performance (30%) |
Actual performance:
Cost discipline continued to be an area of focus for our organization in 2023, challenged by increased throughput associated with a full year performance of assets acquired in 2022 and system expansions across our integrated footprint. Inflationary pressures also resulted in higher than forecasted labor, maintenance and rental costs.
|
| 0.82 | |||||
Project & commercial execution |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Threshold set at achievement of quarterly in-service dates and planned budgets for major projects. May exceed target
We were very successful in bringing major growth capital projects online on-time and Key accomplishments included: ∎ Four Permian plants and the Galena Park export expansion were successfully completed on-time, on-budget and were highly utilized at start-up; ∎ Exited 2023 with approximately 90% of our G&P volumes supported by fees or fee floors; ∎ Completed the integration of two acquisitions made in 2022 in 2023; ∎ Negotiated and executed on ∎ Progress continued on other key major capital projects including additional Permian plants, fractionation trains and ∎ Successfully negotiated additional contracts supporting Targa’s wellhead to water strategy.
| 2.00 |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 37 |
Category | Priorities | Achievements | Score | |||||
Sustainability (10%) | Talent Management |
Actual performance: Our employees are the foundation to fostering safe operation of our assets and delivery of services to our customers. We exited 2023 employing a record approximately 3,182 people. Despite a competitive hiring landscape, we exceeded our expectations in our ability to identify quality talent to join Targa as we focused on
| 1.00 | |||||
ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) |
Threshold set at continuing to advance disclosures, investor and Actual performance: We are proud of the work that we continue to do to safely deliver energy, including to energy-poor areas of the world, in an environmentally and socially responsible way, caring for and being stewards of the environment, and operating our organization with We continued to make significant progress as an organization in 2023. Some of our accomplishments include: ∎ Enhanced our sustainability-related reporting with the publication of our TCFD index; ∎ Expanded our methane management plan disclosures and midstream flaring information; ∎ Increased aerial surveys/compressor station and gas plant methane monitoring; ∎ Continued our focus on flaring reduction; ∎ Continued our efforts with ONE Future and API on methane emissions; ∎ Worked closely with engine manufacturers on methane slip; ∎ Piloted new GTI Veritas draft QMRV protocols; ∎ Continued our dialogue with the investor community and other stakeholders; ∎ Adopted proxy access provisions in our Bylaws; and ∎ Established a formal overboarding policy.
| 1.00 |
2020
* | For a description of how Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as compared to values included in our financial statements, please see additional information on Appendix A. |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 38 |
2023 Bonus Plan Payouts. Based on the assessment described above for 2020, the calculated bonus pool funding rate was 1.39 times the target level under the 2020 Bonus Plan. The Compensation Committee separately reviewed our safety performance for 2020,2023, which included improvements in process and communication, anda slight reduction in overall incident rate but also included an increaseand a decrease in severity. The Compensation Committee did not apply any adjustment to the pool to reflect safety performance.
27
Before determining the approved funding rate, the Committee also considered its appropriateness in light of broader market conditions and shareholder experience during 2020, including reduced distributions and stock price declines. While the Committee acknowledgedBased on the Company’s strong financial and operational performance induring 2023, the face of challenging conditions, they exercised their discretion to capCommittee approved the bonus pool for our NEOs at 1.0x1.35x target.
Category |
Payout Factor |
Weight |
Weighted Factor | Payout Factor | Weight | Weighted Factor | ||||||||||||
Financial | 1.6 | 60% | 0.97 | 1.38 | 60% | 0.83 | ||||||||||||
Operational | 1.1 | 30% | 0.32 | |||||||||||||||
Operational and Commercial | 1.41 | 30% | 0.42 | |||||||||||||||
Sustainability | 1.0 | 10% | 0.10 | 1.00 | 10% | 0.10 | ||||||||||||
Total Calculated Payout | 1.39 |
|
| 1.35 | ||||||||||||||
Total Approved Payout | 1.00 | Total Approved Payout | 1.35 | |||||||||||||||
Individual Performance Multiplier.The Compensation Committee also evaluated the executive group and each officer’s individual performance for the year and determined that there were no special circumstances that would be quantified applicableresult in adjustment to any named executive officer’sNEO’s performance factor for 2020.2023. As a result, the Compensation Committee determined a performance multiplier of 1.0x should be applied to each named executive officer for 20202023 based on the officer’s individual performance and performance as part of the executive team.
Settlement of 20202023 Bonus Awards. The following table reflects the actual awards received by our NEOs under the 20202023 Bonus Plan:
NEO
| Target Bonus ($)
| Individual
| Company
| Actual Bonus Paid (Cash)
| Target Bonus ($) | Individual Performance Factor | Company Performance Factor | Actual Bonus Paid (Cash) | ||||||||||||||||
Perkins | $ | 937,500 | 1.00 | 1.00 | $ | 937,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
Meloy | 1,750,000 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1,750,000 | 1,723,750 | 1.00 | 1.35 | 2,327,100 | ||||||||||||||||
Kneale | 575,000 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 575,000 | 793,750 | 1.00 | 1.35 | 1,071,600 | ||||||||||||||||
McDonie | 525,000 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 525,000 | 615,000 | 1.00 | 1.35 | 830,300 | ||||||||||||||||
Prior | 525,000 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 525,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Pryor | 615,000 | 1.00 | 1.35 | 830,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Muraro | 525,000 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 525,000 | 615,000 | 1.00 | 1.35 | 830,300 |
20212024 Annual Incentive Cash Compensation Program.For 2021,2024, our NEOs are eligible to receive annual cash awards under the 20212024 Annual Incentive Cash Compensation Program (the “2021“2024 Bonus Plan”), which was approved by the Compensation Committee in March 2021.2024. The payments under the 20212024 Bonus Plan consist of cash awards that may be made under our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.
28
Our evaluation of performance in the 20212024 Bonus Plan includeswill include consideration of performance on multiple factors within the following three general categoriescategories: Financial Performance, Operational and with a safetyCommercial Performance and Sustainability. The metrics evaluated within each category overlay:will be reflective of the year’s strategic priorities.
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
| ||
|
|
29
Long-Term Equity Incentives
Equity compensation directly aligns the interests of the NEOs with those of our stockholders. In 2020,2023, the Company granted equity compensation under our Stock Incentive Plan as follows:
Type of Equity Award | Weight | Description | ||
| ||||
Performance Share Units (PSUs) | 50% | Vest at the end of a three-year period contingent on the achievement of the Company’s total shareholder return (TSR) relative to the TSR of a specified comparator group of publicly-traded midstream companies (the “LTIP Peer Group”) measured over the three year period | ||
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) | 50% | Vest in full at the end of a three-year period based solely on continued service; RSUs help to secure and retain executives and instill an ownership mentality |
We express target long-termLong-term equity incentive awards are expressed as a total dollar value based on a percentage of the NEO’s base salary.salary and were established based on the NEO’s level of responsibility and ability to impact overall results. The Compensation Committee also considers market data in setting target long-term equity incentive awards. For awards granted in 2020,2023, the specified percentage of each NEO’s base salary used for purposes of determining the amount of long-term equity incentive awards granted and the corresponding dollar values are set forth in the following table:
NEO | Target Award (% of Salary) | Target Award ($ Value) | Number of (#) | Number of (#) | Target Award (% of Salary) | Target Award (% of Salary) | Target Award ($ Value) | Target Award ($ Value) | Number of (#) | Number of (#) | Number of PSUs Granted (#) | Number of PSUs Granted (#) | ||||||||||||||||
Perkins | 600% | $ 4,500,000 | 55,255 | 55,255 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meloy | 800% | 7,000,000 | 85,593 | 85,953 | 800% | 800% | 7,880,000 | 7,880,000 | 53,562 | 53,562 | 53,562 | 53,562 | ||||||||||||||||
Kneale | 400% | 2,300,000 | 28,242 | 28,242 | 450% | 450% | 2,857,500 | 2,857,500 | 19,423 | 19,423 | 19,423 | 19,423 | ||||||||||||||||
McDonie | 325% | 1,706,250 | 20,951 | 20,951 | 325% | 325% | 1,998,750 | 1,998,750 | 13,586 | 13,586 | 13,586 | 13,586 | ||||||||||||||||
Pryor | 325% | 1,706,250 | 20,951 | 20,951 | 325% | 325% | 1,998,750 | 1,998,750 | 13,586 | 13,586 | 13,586 | 13,586 | ||||||||||||||||
Muraro | 325% | 1,706,250 | 20,951 | 20,951 | 325% | 325% | 1,998,750 | 1,998,750 | 13,586 | 13,586 | 13,586 | 13,586 |
The number of shares subject to each award is determined by dividing the total dollar value allocated to the award by the ten-day average closing price of the shares measured over a period prior to the date of grant.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 40 |
2020
2023 PSU Plan Design
PSUs vest depending on the satisfaction of certain service-related conditions and the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of the members of the LTIP Peer Group measured over a single three-year performance period. For the 20202023 PSUs, the LTIP Peer Group was composed of the companies that make up the Alerian US Midstream Index (AMUS), using the following payout schedule:
Relative TSR Attainment vs. Companies Midstream Index | Guideline Performance Percentage (% of target) | ||
Below | 0% | ||
| 50% | ||
| 100% | ||
| 250% |
30
As shown inTarget payout is set at the table, in 2020 we shifted our target payout from the 50th percentile to the 55th55th percentile to ensure that a target payout requires performance above the median of our performance peers. Payout for performance between threshold and target or between target and maximum are calculated using straight-line interpolation.
The performance period for the 20202023 PSUs began on January 1, 20202023 and ends on December 31, 20222025 and TSR for the period is measured using the following formula:
TSR = |
| Average closing price at end of period + dividends paid over period | ||||
Average closing price at beginning of period |
20182021 – 20202023 PSU Plan Payout
The PSUs granted to our NEOs in 20182021 used a similar structure as the 20202023 PSUs except thatfor the performance period consisted of three annual periods (2018, 2019 and 2020) and a cumulative three year period that began onfrom January 1, 2018 and ended on2021 through December 31, 2020.2023. The LTIP Peer Group for the 20182021 PSUs was a subsetthe companies in the AMUS index as of the midstream companies included inbeginning of the 2018 compensation peer group. The TSR performance factor was based on relative TSR performance over the designated weighting periods as follows:period.
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
On January 19, 2021,18, 2024, our Compensation Committee determined that the overall vesting percentage that was earned for the 20182021 PSUs was 173%250% of target grant amounts, andbased upon performance in the corresponding shares became vested.top decile of the AMUS index companies:
Performance Period | Targa Percentile Rank | Weight | Percent of Target Earned | |||
Year 1 TSR | 56th | 25% | 134% | |||
Year 2 TSR | 56th | 25% | 134% | |||
Year 3 TSR | 63th | 25% | 175% | |||
Cumulative 3 year TSR | 75th | 25% | 250% | |||
Weighted Average | 173% |
Targa 3-year TSR Performance | Targa Percentile Rank in AMUS | Percent of Target Earned | ||
248% | 97th percentile (2nd out of 36 companies) |
250% |
Because vesting did not occur until our Compensation Committee determined the achievement of applicable performance goals at the beginning of 2021,2024, these awards were still considered “outstanding” as of December 31, 20202023 for purposes of the compensation tables that follow this CD&A.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 41 |
31
OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PRACTICES AND POLICIES
Stock Ownership Guidelines
In 2017, ourOur Compensation Committee has adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines for our independent directors and executive officers. We believe that our Stock Ownership Guidelines align the interests of our executive officers and independent directors with the interests of our stockholders. The guidelines below were established with advice from the Compensation Consultant and are believed to follow market standards.
Ownership Requirement | |||
Chief Executive Officer | 5.0 x base salary | ||
Other Executives | 3.0 x base salary | ||
Nonemployee Directors | 5.0 x annual cash retainer |
The CEO, executive officers and directors have five years from the date first subject to the guidelines to meet the applicable ownership levels. Stock owned directly by an officer or independent director as well as unvested restricted stock units will count for purposes of determining stock ownership levels. All NEOs are compliant with our Stock Ownership Guidelines.
Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy
All of our officers, employees and directors are subject to our Insider Trading Policy, which, among other things, prohibits officers, employees and directors from engaging in certain short-term or speculative transactions involving our securities. Specifically, the policy provides that officers employees and directors may not engage in the following transactions: (i) the purchase of our common stock on margin, (ii) short sales of our common stock, or (iii) the purchase or sale of options of any kind, whether puts or calls, or other derivative securities, relating to our common stock. We have also amended ourOur Insider Trading Policy soalso specifies that officers, employees and directors may not enter into pledges of our securities as collateral. In order to allow time to unwind any existing pledge arrangements, such arrangements must be cancelled or modified so that the securities are no longer pledged by April 2022.
Recoupment ClawbackIncentive Compensation Recovery Policy
In December 2019,September 2023, our Board adopted an executive incentive compensation clawback policy.recovery policy effective as of October 2023, to comply with Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 following implementation of final rules by the NYSE. Our policy provides that performance-based incentiveincentive-based compensation (cash or equity) paid to our current or former Section 16 officers maymust be recovered (unless impracticable) in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial results or under certain other circumstances,that would result in such as an officer’s misconduct that results in an adverse impact on the Company’s financial or stock price performance.officers receiving erroneously awarded compensation. In connection with such events,event, the Compensation Committee will have the right to require the reimbursement or forfeiture of any performance-based incentive payments,incentive-based compensation, including payments under the annual incentive plan and performance-based PSUs, paid to the officer to the extent permitted by applicable law. The clawback policy applies to all performance-based incentiveincentive-based compensation granted following the adoption ofdeemed “received” under the clawback policy.rules on or after October 2, 2023.
In addition, the Company will take action to modify the clawback policy to comply with Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 should the SEC determine and implement final rules. Furthermore, restricted stock, restricted stock unit and performance share unit agreements covering awards made to our named executive officers and other applicable employees include language providing that any compensation, payments or benefits provided under such an award (including profits realized from the sale of earned shares) are subject to clawback to the extent required by applicable law.
32
Compensation Risk Assessment
The Compensation Committee reviews the relationship between our risk management policies and compensation policies and practices each year and, for 2020,2023, has concluded that we do not have any compensation policies or practices that expose us to excessive or unnecessary risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. Because our Compensation Committee retains the sole discretion for determining the actual amount paid to executives pursuant to our annual incentive bonus program, our Compensation Committee is able to assess the actual behavior of our executives as it relates to risk-taking in awarding bonus amounts. In addition, the performance objectives applicable to our annual bonus program consist of diverse company-wide and business
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 42 |
unit goals, including commercial, operational and financial goals to support our business plan and priorities, which we believe lessens the potential incentive to focus on meeting certain short-term goals at the expense of longer-term risk. Further, our use of long-term equity incentive compensation for 20202023 with three-year vesting periods in combination with meaningful ownership requirements serves our executive compensation program’s goal of aligning the interests of executives and shareholders, thereby reducing the incentives to unnecessary risk-taking.
Retirement, Health and Welfare, and Other Benefits
Employees are eligible to participate in a section 401(k) tax-qualified, defined contribution plan (the “401(k) Plan”), which helps employees save for retirement through a tax-advantaged combination of employee and company contributions and directly manage their retirement plan assets through a variety of investment options. Under the plan, participants may elect to defer up to 30% of their eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis (or on a post-tax basis via a Roth contribution), subject to certain limitations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In addition, we make the following contributions to the 401(k) Plan for the benefit of our employees, including our NEOs: (i) 3% of the employee’s eligible compensation, and (ii) an amount equal to the employee’s contributions to the 401(k) Plan up to 5% of the employee’s eligible compensation. The 5% matching contribution by the Company was suspended on June 1, 2020 but was reinstated effective January 1, 2021. In addition, we may also make discretionary contributions to the 401(k) Plan for the benefit of employees depending on our performance. Company contributions to the 401(k) Plan may be subject to certain limitations under the Code for certain employees. We do not maintain a defined benefit pension plan or a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for our NEOs or other employees.
All full-time employees, including our NEOs, are eligible to participate in our health and welfare benefit programs, including medical, life insurance, dental coverage and disability insurance. It is the Compensation Committee’s policy not to pay for perquisites for any of our NEOs, other than minimal parking subsidies.
Change in Control and Severance Benefits
Our ability to build the exceptional leadership team we have today was due in large part to our having the full complement of compensation tools available to us and the flexibility to use them. This includes the ability to leverage change in control and severance benefits.
The Compensation Committee believes that together, our change in control and severance benefits, which are guided by our governance practices and policies, are well-aligned with those of our peers. More importantly, they foster stability and focus within the senior leadership team by helping to ensure that personal concerns regarding job security do not hinder mergers, reorganizations or other transactions that may be in the best interest of shareholders.
Please see “Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below for further information.
33
Accounting Considerations
We account for the equity compensation expense for our employees, including our named executive officers, under the rules of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. This regulation requires us to record an expense for each award of long-term equity incentive compensation over the vesting period of the award based on the fair value at the grant date. Accounting rules also require us to record cash compensation as an expense at the time the obligation is accrued.
Tax Considerations
We consider the impact of various tax rules in implementing our compensation program. Section 162(m) of the Code (“Section 162(m)”) generally limits the deductibility by a corporation of compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to certain executive officers. Due to the fact that our executive officers provide services to both us and to certain non-corporate subsidiaries, we have historically designed incentive awards that are not subject to the deduction limitations of Section 162(m). However, recent regulations were published with respect to Section 162(m) that will alter the way that compensation is allocated between services to us and our subsidiaries, and certain compensation granted to our covered executive officers may become subject to the deductibility restrictions of 162(m). Our Compensation Committee believes that its primary responsibility is to provide a compensation program that is consistent with its compensation philosophy and supports the achievement of its compensation objectives. Therefore, the Compensation Committee has retained the authority to grant appropriate compensation items or awards to our service providers notwithstanding an adverse tax or accounting treatment for that compensation.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 43 |
Compensation Committee Report
Messrs. Davis, CrispMses. Bowman and EvansCooksen and Ms. BowmanMr. Teague are the current members of our Compensation Committee. Effective March 15, 2021, the Board of Directors appointed Ms. Bowman as a member of the Compensation Committee. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee as composed prior to March 15, 2021, has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.2023. Based on these reviews and discussions, the Compensation Committee as composed prior to March 15, 2021, recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.2023.
The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act.
The Compensation Committee
Beth A. Bowman | ||||||
CHAIRMAN |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 44 |
34
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table for 20202023
The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth the compensation of our named executive officers for 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018.2021. Additional details regarding the applicable elements of compensation in the Summary Compensation Table are provided in the footnotes following the table.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus (1) | Stock Awards ($) (2) (3) | All Other Compensation (4) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Joe Bob Perkins | 2020 | $ 746,875 | $ 937,500 | $ 9,504,775 | $ 24,110 | $ 11,213,260 | ||||||||||||||||||
Executive Chairman | 2019 | 891,667 | — | 11,545,172 | 23,710 | 12,460,549 | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 833,333 | — | 12,624,959 | 23,310 | 13,481,602 | |||||||||||||||||||
Matthew J. Meloy | 2020 | $ 779,967 | $ 1,750,000 | $ 9,548,519 | $ 24,110 | $ 12,102,596 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer | 2019 | 587,500 | 1,920,000 | 3,921,450 | 23,710 | 6,452,660 | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 516,667 | 1,115,625 | 3,914,716 | 23,037 | 5,570,045 | |||||||||||||||||||
Jennifer R. Kneale | 2020 | $ 524,271 | $ 575,000 | $ 3,137,404 | $ 24,056 | $ 4,260,731 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer | 2019 | 391,667 | 640,000 | 2,091,404 | 23,274 | 3,146,345 | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 332,500 | 446,250 | 1,166,427 | 22,535 | 1,967,712 | |||||||||||||||||||
Patrick J. McDonie | 2020 | $ 501,146 | $ 525,000 | $ 2,327,447 | $ 23,947 | $ 3,377,540 | ||||||||||||||||||
President – Gathering and Processing | 2019 | 495,833 | 800,000 | 2,124,127 | 23,492 | 3,443,452 | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 466,667 | 807,500 | 1,803,674 | 22,928 | 3,100,769 | |||||||||||||||||||
D. Scott Pryor | 2020 | $ 501,146 | $ 525,000 | $ 2,327,447 | $ 23,947 | $ 3,377,540 | ||||||||||||||||||
President – Logistics and | 2019 | 495,833 | 800,000 | 2,124,127 | 23,492 | 3,443,452 | ||||||||||||||||||
Transportation | 2018 | 466,667 | 807,500 | 1,803,674 | 22,928 | 3,100,769 | ||||||||||||||||||
2020 | $ 501,146 | $ 525,000 | $ 2,327,447 | $ 23,947 | $ 3,377,540 | |||||||||||||||||||
Robert M. Muraro | 2019 | 491,667 | 800,000 | 2,124,127 | 23,492 | 3,439,286 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chief Commercial Officer | 2018 | 433,333 | 765,000 | 1,666,299 | 22,764 | 2,887,396 |
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus (1) | Stock Awards ($) (2) | All Other Compensation (3) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matthew J. Meloy Chief Executive Officer |
| 2023 |
| $ 970,475 |
| $ 2,327,100 |
| $ 10,864,516 |
| $ 29,539 |
| $ 14,191,630 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 |
| 900,000 |
| 3,600,000 |
| 10,675,003 |
| 27,539 |
| 15,202,542 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 |
| 875,000 |
| 3,500,000 |
| 10,289,456 |
| 27,484 |
| 14,691,940 | |||||||||||||||||||
Jennifer R. Kneale Chief Financial Officer |
| 2023 |
| $ 629,167 |
| $ 1,071,600 |
| $ 3,939,761 |
| $ 29,539 |
| $ 5,670,067 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 |
| 600,000 |
| 1,500,000 |
| 4,003,208 |
| 27,539 |
| 6,130,747 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 |
| 575,000 |
| 1,150,000 |
| 3,380,808 |
| 26,015 |
| 5,131,823 | |||||||||||||||||||
Patrick J. McDonie President – Gathering and Processing |
| 2023 |
| $ 602,500 |
| $ 830,300 |
| $ 2,755,784 |
| $ 29,539 |
| $ 4,218,123 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 |
| 540,000 |
| 1,080,000 |
| 2,601,978 |
| 27,225 |
| 4,249,203 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 |
| 525,000 |
| 1,050,000 |
| 2,508,037 |
| 25,770 |
| 4,108,807 | |||||||||||||||||||
D. Scott Pryor President – Logistics and Transportation |
| 2023 |
| $ 602,500 |
| $ 830,300 |
| $ 2,755,784 |
| $ 29,539 |
| $ 4,218,123 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 |
| 540,000 |
| 1,080,000 |
| 2,601,978 |
| 27,225 |
| 4,249,203 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 |
| 525,000 |
| 1,050,000 |
| 2,508,037 |
| 25,770 |
| 4,108,807 | |||||||||||||||||||
Robert M. Muraro Chief Commercial Officer |
| 2023 |
| $ 602,500 |
| $ 830,300 |
| $ 2,755,784 |
| $ 29,539 |
| $ 4,218,123 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 |
| 540,000 |
| 1,080,000 |
| 2,601,978 |
| 27,225 |
| 4,249,203 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 |
| 525,000 |
| 1,050,000 |
| 2,508,037 |
| 25,770 |
| 4,108,807 |
(1) | For |
(2) | Amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” column for |
35
named executive officer is as follows: Mr. |
(3) |
|
For |
Name | 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan | Dollar Value of Life Insurance Premiums | Total | |||||||||
Joe Bob Perkins | $ 22,800 | $ 1,310 | $ 24,110 | |||||||||
Matthew J. Meloy | 22,800 | 1,310 | 24,110 | |||||||||
Jennifer R. Kneale | 22,800 | 1,256 | 24,056 | |||||||||
Patrick J. McDonie | 22,800 | 1,147 | 23,947 | |||||||||
D. Scott Pryor | 22,800 | 1,147 | 23,947 | |||||||||
Robert M. Muraro | 22,800 | 1,147 | 23,947 |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 45 |
Name | 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan | Dollar Value of Life Insurance Premiums | Total | |||||||||
Matthew J. Meloy | $ 26,400 | $ 3,139 | $ 29,539 | |||||||||
Jennifer R. Kneale | 26,400 | 3,139 | 29,539 | |||||||||
Patrick J. McDonie | 26,400 | 3,139 | 29,539 | |||||||||
D. Scott Pryor | 26,400 | 3,139 | 29,539 | |||||||||
Robert M. Muraro | 26,400 | 3,139 | 29,539 |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 20202023
The following table and the footnotes thereto provide information regarding grants of plan-based equity awards made to the named executive officers during 2020:2023:
Name | Grant Date | Estimated Future Payouts Under Performance Share Unit Awards | Equity Awards: Number of Units | Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards (3) | Grant Date | Grant Date | Estimated Future Payouts Under Performance Share Unit Awards | Estimated Future Payouts Under Performance Share Unit Awards | Equity Awards: (#)
| Equity Awards: (#)
| Grant Date
| Grant Date
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | Threshold (#) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | Maximum (#) | Equity Awards: (#)
| Equity Awards: (#)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Perkins | 01/16/20 (1) | 27,628 | 55,255 | 138,138 | 55,255 | $ 6,138,228 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/16/20 (2) | 81,336 | 3,366,497 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Meloy | 01/16/20 (1) | 42,977 | 85,953 | 214,883 | 85,953 | 9,548,518 | 01/19/23(1) | 01/19/23(1) | 26,781 | 26,781 | 53,562 | 53,562 | 133,905 | 133,905 | 53,562 | 53,562 | 10,864,516 | 10,864,516 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ms. Kneale | 01/16/20 (1) | 14,121 | 28,242 | 70,605 | 28,242 | 3,137,404 | 01/19/23 (1) | 01/19/23 (1) | 9,712 | 9,712 | 19,423 | 19,423 | 48,558 | 48,558 | 19,423 | 19,423 | 3,939,761 | 3,939,761 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mr. McDonie | 01/16/20 (1) | 10,476 | 20,951 | 52,378 | 20,951 | 2,327,447 | 01/19/23 (1) | 01/19/23 (1) | 6,793 | 6,793 | 13,586 | 13,586 | 33,965 | 33,965 | 13,586 | 13,586 | 2,755,784 | 2,755,784 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Pryor | 01/16/20 (1) | 10,476 | 20,951 | 52,378 | 20,951 | 2,327,447 | 01/19/23 (1) | 01/19/23 (1) | 6,793 | 6,793 | 13,586 | 13,586 | 33,965 | 33,965 | 13,586 | 13,586 | 2,755,784 | 2,755,784 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Muraro | 01/16/20 (1) | 10,476 | 20,951 | 52,378 | 20,951 | 2,327,447 | 01/19/23 (1) | 01/19/23 (1) | 6,793 | 6,793 | 13,586 | 13,586 | 33,965 | 33,965 | 13,586 | 13,586 | 2,755,784 | 2,755,784 |
(1) | These grants on January |
(2) |
|
36
The value within the “Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards” column was determined by multiplying the shares awarded by the grant date fair value per share computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718: |
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan Based Awards Table
A discussion of 20202023 salaries, bonuses, incentive plans and awards is set forth in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” including a discussion of the material terms and conditions of the 20202023 restricted stock unit and performance share unit awards under our Stock Incentive Plan. Further discussion regarding restricted stock units granted in January 2020 in lieu of a cash payment under our 2019 Bonus Plan are described in our proxy statement for our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2020.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 46 |
Outstanding Equity Awards at 20202023 Fiscal Year-End
The following table and the footnotes related thereto provide information regarding equity-based awards outstanding as of December 31, 20202023 for each of our named executive officers. None of our named executive officers held any outstanding stock option awards as of December 31, 2020.2023.
Stock Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Shares That | Market Value of | Performance | Performance | Number of Shares That Have Not Vested (1) | Number of Shares That Have Not Vested (1) | Market Value of Shares | Market Value of Shares | Performance Share Units: Number of Unearned Units That Have Not Vested (3) | Performance Share Units: Number of Unearned Units That Have Not Vested (3) | Performance Share Units: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Units That Have Not Vested (4) | Performance Share Units: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Units That Have Not Vested (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joe Bob Perkins | 460,612 | $ | 12,150,945 | 336,878 | $ | 8,886,842 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matthew J. Meloy | 252,931 | 6,672,320 | 306,258 | 8,079,086 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jennifer R. Kneale | 106,707 | 2,814,931 | 119,338 | 3,148,136 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patrick J. McDonie | 122,774 | 3,238,778 | 101,873 | 2,687,410 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. Scott Pryor | 122,774 | 3,238,778 | 101,873 | 2,687,410 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert M. Muraro | 134,994 | 3,561,142 | 101,873 | 2,687,410 |
(1) | Represents the following shares of restricted stock units (and earned performance units) under our Stock Incentive Plan held by our named executive officers: |
Joe Bob Perkins | Matthew J. Meloy | Jennifer R. Kneale | Patrick J. McDonie | D. Scott Pryor | Robert M. Muraro | |||||||||||||||||||
January 6, 2016 Award (a) | — | — | 5,000 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
January 20, 2017 Award (b) | — | 50,000 | 30,000 | 45,000 | 45,000 | 60,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
January 17, 2018 Award (c) | 46,987 | 26,383 | 7,915 | 11,935 | 11,935 | 11,307 | ||||||||||||||||||
January 17, 2018 Award (d) | 45,831 | 8,402 | 2,364 | 4,442 | 4,442 | 3,377 | ||||||||||||||||||
January 17, 2018 Award (e) | 81,288 | 45,643 | 13,693 | 20,648 | 20,648 | 19,561 | ||||||||||||||||||
January 17, 2019 Award (f) | 79,496 | 36,550 | 19,493 | 19,798 | 19,798 | 19,798 | ||||||||||||||||||
January 17, 2019 Award (g) | 70,419 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
January 16, 2020 Award (h) | 55,255 | 85,953 | 28,242 | 20,951 | 20,951 | 20,951 | ||||||||||||||||||
January 16, 2020 Award (i) | 81,336 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | 460,612 | 252,931 | 106,707 | 122,774 | 122,774 | 134,994 |
| Matthew J. Meloy | Jennifer R. Kneale | Patrick J. McDonie | D. Scott Pryor | Robert M. Muraro | ||||||||||||||||||||
January 19, 2021 Award (a) | 118,967 | 39,089 | 28,998 | 28,998 | 28,998 | ||||||||||||||||||||
January 19, 2021 Award (b) | 297,418 | 97,723 | 72,495 | 72,495 | 72,495 | ||||||||||||||||||||
January 20, 2022 Award (c) | 64,748 | 24,281 | 15,782 | 15,782 | 15,782 | ||||||||||||||||||||
January 19, 2023 Award (d) | 53,562 | 19,423 | 13,586 | 13,586 | 13,586 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 534,695 | 180,516 | 130,861 | 130,861 | 130,861 |
37
(a) | The restricted stock units awarded January |
|
|
The awards in this row originally related to performance share units granted in 2021, but for which the performance period ended on December 31, 2023. Because the awards were no longer subject to performance conditions, but would not be deemed “vested” until the Compensation Committee certified performance levels in early 2024, they are still deemed to be outstanding for purposes of this table, subject only to time-based vesting requirements. The target awards were multiplied by 250%, the actual adjustment factor applied to the awards upon determination of performance levels in 2024. |
(c) | The restricted stock units awarded January |
|
The restricted stock units awarded January |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S |
|
|
|
The treatment of the outstanding restricted stock unit awards upon certain terminations of employment (including retirement) or the occurrence of a change in control is described below under “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
(2) | The dollar amounts shown are determined by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock units reported in the table by the closing price of a share of our common stock on December |
38
(3) | Represents the following performance share units linked to the performance of the Company’s common stock held by our named executive officers: |
January 17, 2019 Award | January 16, 2020 Award | |||||||||||||||
Awards Granted
| (a) Adjusted for Performance Factor (TSR) | Awards Granted
| (b) Adjusted for Performance Factor (TSR) | |||||||||||||
Joe Bob Perkins | 79,496 | 198,740 | 55,255 | 138,138 | ||||||||||||
Matthew J. Meloy | 36,550 | 91,375 | 85,953 | 214,883 | ||||||||||||
Jennifer R. Kneale | 19,493 | 48,733 | 28,242 | 70,605 | ||||||||||||
Patrick J. McDonie | 19,798 | 49,495 | 20,951 | 52,378 | ||||||||||||
D. Scott Pryor | 19,798 | 49,495 | 20,951 | 52,378 | ||||||||||||
Robert M. Muraro | 19,798 | 49,495 | 20,951 | 52,378 |
| January 20, 2022 Award | January 19, 2023 Award | ||||||||||||||||||
| Awards Granted | (a) Adjusted for Performance Factor (TSR) | Awards Granted | (b) Adjusted for Factor (TSR) | ||||||||||||||||
Matthew J. Meloy | 64,748 | 161,870 | 53,562 | 133,905 | ||||||||||||||||
Jennifer R. Kneale | 24,281 | 60,703 | 19,423 | 48,558 | ||||||||||||||||
Patrick J. McDonie | 15,782 | 39,455 | 13,586 | 33,965 | ||||||||||||||||
D. Scott Pryor | 15,782 | 39,455 | 13,586 | 33,965 | ||||||||||||||||
Robert M. Muraro | 15,782 | 39,455 | 13,586 | 33,965 |
(a) | Reflects the target number of performance share units granted to the named executive officers on January |
(b) | Reflects the target number of performance share units granted to the named executive officers on January |
The treatment of the outstanding performance share unit awards upon certain terminations of employment (including retirement) or the occurrence of a change in control is described below under “—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
(4) | The dollar amounts shown are determined by multiplying the number of shares of performance share units reported in the table by the closing price of a share of our common stock on December |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 48 |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 20202023
The following table provides the amount realized during 20202023 by each named executive officer upon the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units. None of our named executive officers exercised any option awards during the 20202023 year and, currently, there are no options outstanding under any of our plans.
Stock Awards | ||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting (1) ($) | ||||||
Joe Bob Perkins | 64,309 | $ | 2,586,513 | |||||
Matthew J. Meloy | 26,801 | 1,067,424 | ||||||
Jennifer R. Kneale | 12,800 | 362,050 | ||||||
Patrick J. McDonie | 17,854 | 713,836 | ||||||
D. Scott Pryor | 17,722 | 709,560 | ||||||
Robert M. Muraro | 42,474 | 1,188,928 |
| Stock Awards | |||||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting (1) ($) | ||||||||
Matthew J. Meloy | 320,836 | $ 24,082,346 | ||||||||
Jennifer R. Kneale | 110,847 | 8,323,563 | ||||||||
Patrick J. McDonie | 91,329 | 6,863,126 | ||||||||
D. Scott Pryor | 91,329 | 6,863,126 | ||||||||
Robert M. Muraro | 97,329 | 7,317,086 |
(1) | Computed with respect to the restricted stock unit awards granted under our Stock Incentive Plan by multiplying the number of shares of stock vesting by the closing price of a share of common stock on the January |
39
($ |
Pension Benefits
Other than our 401(k) plan, we do not have any plan that provides for payments or other benefits at, following, or in connection with, retirement.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
We do not have any plan that provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax qualified.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Aggregate Payments
The table below reflects the aggregate amount of payments and benefits that we believeestimate our named executive officers would have received under the Change in Control Program (described below) and Stock Incentive Plan upon certain specified termination of employment and/or a change in control events, in each case, had such event occurred on December 31, 2020.2023. Details regarding individual plans and arrangements follow the table. The amounts below constitute estimates of the amounts that would be paid to our named executive officers upon each designated event, and do not include any amounts accrued through 2023 fiscal 2020 year-end that would be paid in the normal course of continued employment, such as accrued but unpaid salary and benefits generally available to all salaried employees. The actual amounts to be paid are dependent on various factors, which may or may not exist at the time a named executive officer is actually terminated and/or a change in control actually occurs. Therefore, such amounts and disclosures should be considered “forward-looking statements.”
Name | Change in Control (No Termination) | Qualifying Termination Following Change in Control | Termination by us without Cause | Termination for Death or Disability | Change in Control (No Termination) | Change in Control (No Termination) | Qualifying Termination Following Change in Control | Qualifying Termination Following Change in Control | Termination by us without Cause | Termination by us without Cause | Termination for Death or Disability | Termination for Death or Disability | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joe Bob Perkins | $ 13,696,619 | $25,125,587 | — | $20,019,361 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matthew J. Meloy | 7,489,504 | 21,920,407 | — | 13,987,252 | — | — | $ 82,518,716 | $ 82,518,716 | — | — | $ 74,367,479 | $ 74,367,479 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jennifer R. Kneale | 3,691,635 | 9,276,632 | — | 5,826,632 | — | — | 30,227,772 | 30,227,772 | — | — | 25,941,522 | 25,941,522 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patrick J. McDonie | 4,519,662 | 9,316,054 | — | 6,103,492 | — | — | 21,996,636 | 21,996,636 | — | — | 18,290,757 | 18,290,757 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D. Scott Pryor | 4,519,662 | 9,304,432 | — | 6,103,492 | — | — | 21,999,372 | 21,999,372 | — | — | 18,290,757 | 18,290,757 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert M. Muraro | 5,047,318 | 9,839,304 | — | 6,631,149 | — | — | 22,005,744 | 22,005,744 | — | — | 18,290,757 | 18,290,757 |
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 49 |
Executive Officer Change in Control Severance Program
We adopted the Change in Control Program on and effective as of January 12, 2012, and amended in 2015. Each of our named executive officers was an eligible participant in the Change in Control Program during the 20202023 calendar year.
The Change in Control Program is administered by our Senior Vice President—Human Resources. The Change in Control Program provides that if, in connection with or within 18 months after a “Change in Control,” a participant suffers a “Qualifying Termination,” then the individual will receive a severance payment, paid in a single lump sum cash payment within 60 days following the date of termination, equal to three times (i) the participant’s annual salary as of the date of the Change in Control or the date of termination, whichever is greater, and (ii) the amount of the participant’s annual salary multiplied by the participant’s most recent “target”
40
bonus percentage specified by the Compensation Committee prior to the Change in Control. In addition, the participant (and his or her eligible dependents, as applicable) will receive the continuation of their medical and dental benefits until the earlier to occur of (a) three years from the date of termination, or (b) the date the participant becomes eligible for coverage under another employer’s plan.
For purposes of the Change in Control Program, the following terms will generally have the meanings set forth below:
Cause means discharge of the participant by us on the following grounds: (i) the participant’s gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of his duties, (ii) the participant’s conviction of a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude, (iii) the participant’s willful refusal, after 15 days’ written notice, to perform his material lawful duties or responsibilities, (iv) the participant’s willful and material breach of any corporate policy or code of conduct, or (v) the participant’s willfully engaging in conduct that is known or should be known to be materially injurious to us or our subsidiaries.
∎ | Cause means discharge of the participant by us on the following grounds: (i) the participant’s gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of his or her duties, (ii) the participant’s conviction of a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude, (iii) the participant’s willful refusal, after 15 days’ written notice, to perform his or her material lawful duties or responsibilities, (iv) the participant’s willful and material breach of any corporate policy or code of conduct, or (v) the participant’s willfully engaging in conduct that is known or should be known to be materially injurious to us or our subsidiaries. |
Change in Control means any of the following events: (i) any person (other than the Partnership) becomes the beneficial owner of more than 20% of the voting interest in us or in the General Partner, (ii) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or the General Partner (other than to the Partnership or its affiliates), (iii) a transaction resulting in a person other than Targa Resources GP LLC or an affiliate being the General Partner of the Partnership, (iv) the consummation of any merger, consolidation or reorganization involving us or the General Partner in which less than 51% of the total voting power of outstanding stock of the surviving or resulting entity is beneficially owned by the stockholders of the Company or the General Partner, immediately prior to the consummation of the transaction, or (v) a majority of the members of the Board of Directors or the board of directors of the General Partner is replaced during any 12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the applicable Board of Directors before the date of the appointment or election.
∎ | Change in Control means any of the following events: (i) any person (other than the Partnership) becomes the beneficial owner of more than 20% of the voting interest in us or in the General Partner, (ii) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or the General Partner (other than to the Partnership or its affiliates), (iii) a transaction resulting in a person other than Targa Resources GP LLC or an affiliate being the General Partner of the Partnership, (iv) the consummation of any merger, consolidation or reorganization involving us or the General Partner in which less than 51% of the total voting power of outstanding stock of the surviving or resulting entity is beneficially owned by the stockholders of the Company or the General Partner, immediately prior to the consummation of the transaction, or (v) a majority of the members of the Board of Directors or the board of directors of the General Partner is replaced during any 12-month period by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the applicable Board of Directors before the date of the appointment or election. |
Good Reason means: (i) a material reduction in the participant’s authority, duties or responsibilities, (ii) a material reduction in the participant’s base compensation, or (iii) a material change in the geographical location at which the participant must perform services. The individual must provide notice to us of the alleged Good Reason event within 90 days of its occurrence and we have the opportunity to remedy the alleged Good Reason event within 30 days from receipt of the notice of such allegation.
∎ | Good Reason means: (i) a material reduction in the participant’s authority, duties or responsibilities, (ii) a material reduction in the participant’s base compensation, or (iii) a material change in the geographical location at which the participant must perform services. The individual must provide notice to us of the alleged Good Reason event within 90 days of its occurrence and we have the opportunity to remedy the alleged Good Reason event within 30 days from receipt of the notice of such allegation. |
Qualifying Termination
∎ | Qualifying Termination means (i) an involuntary termination of the individual’s employment by us without Cause or (ii) a voluntary resignation of the individual’s employment for Good Reason. |
All payments due under the Change in Control Program will be conditioned on the execution and non-revocation of a release for our benefit and the benefit of our related entities and agents. The Change in Control Program will supersede any other severance program for eligible participants in the event of a Change in Control, but will not affect accelerated vesting of any equity awards under the terms of the plans governing such awards.
If amounts payable to a named executive officer under the Change in Control Program, together with any other amounts that are payable by us as a result of a Change in Control (collectively, the “Payments”), exceed the amount allowed under section 280G of the Code for such individual, thereby subjecting the individual to an excise tax under section 4999 of the Code, then, depending on which method produces the largest net after-tax benefit for the recipient, the Payments shall either be: (i) reduced to the level at which no excise tax applies or (ii) paid in full, which would subject the individual to the excise tax.
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 50 |
41
The following table reflects payments that would have been made to each of the named executive officers under the Change in Control Program in the event there was a Change in Control and the officer incurred a Qualifying Termination, in each case as of December 31, 2020.2023.
|
| ||||
| Qualifying Termination Following | ||||
Matthew J. Meloy | $ 8,151,237 | ||||
Jennifer R. Kneale | 4,286,250 | ||||
Patrick J. McDonie | 3,705,879 | ||||
D. Scott Pryor | 3,708,615 | ||||
Robert M. Muraro | 3,714,987 |
(1) | Includes 3 years’ worth of continued participation in our medical and dental plans, calculated based on the monthly employer-paid portion of the premiums for our medical and dental plans as of December 31, |
Stock Incentive Plan
Our named executive officers held outstanding restricted stock units under our form of restricted stock unit agreement (the “Stock Agreement”), and performance share units under our form of performance share unit agreement (the “Performance Agreement”) and the Stock Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2020.2023. The terms applicable to certain Change in Control vesting scenarios within the outstanding Performance Agreements were amended in 2021 in order to bring their terms more in line with practices at our peer group, and the description below reflects those amendments. If a “Change in Control” occurs and the named executive officer has (i) remained continuously employed by us from the date of grant to the date upon which such Change in Control occurs and their employment was terminated by us without Cause or they terminated their employment for Good Reason, in either case within the 18 month24-month period following a Change in Control, (a “Change in Control Termination”) or (ii) retired following the date of grant and either performed consulting services for us or refrained from working for one of our competitors or in a similar role for another company (however, directorships at non-competitors are permitted), through the date of the Change in Control, then, (a) the restricted stock units granted to the officer under the Stock Agreement, and related dividends then credited to the officer, will fully vest on the date upon which such Change in Control Termination occurs with respect to clause (i) above or the Change in Control occurs with respect to clause (ii) above, and (b) the performance share units granted to the officer under the Performance Agreement and related dividends credited to the officer will vest based on a performance factorthe greater of 100% and the actual guideline percentage determined by the Compensation Committee as of the date such Change in Control Termination occurs with respect to clause (i) above or the Change in Control occurs with respect to clause (ii) above. occurs.
The Performance Agreements governing awards granted in 20202023 have a performance period of January 1, 20202023 through December 31, 2022.2025, while the Performance Agreements governing awards granted in 2022 have a performance period of January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024 and the Performance Agreements governing awards granted in 2021 have a performance period of January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023. Upon a Change in Control, the Compensation Committee will take into account the performance level achieved for the applicable performance period using a deemed performance percentage of the greater of 100%. The and the actual guideline percentage. With respect to all outstanding Performance Agreements, the average performance percentage may then be decreased or increased by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. The Performance Agreements governing awards granteddiscretion in 2018 and 2019 have four separate performance periods: (1) the first calendar year of the three-year performance period, (2) the second calendar year of the three-year performance period, (3) the third calendar year of the three-year performance period, and (4) the entirety of the performance period for the full three calendar years. Upon a Change in Control,order to reflect any factors the Compensation Committee will take into accountdeems relevant to properly reflect the average of the performance level achieved for each of the four performance periods, using the actual performance level achieved with respect to any completed period, and a deemed performance percentage of 100% for any performance period that has not been completed. The average percentage may then be decreased or increased by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.event.
Restricted stock units and performance share units granted to a named executive officer under the Stock Agreement and Performance Agreement, and related dividends then credited to the officer, will also fully vest if
42
the named executive officer’s employment is terminated by reason of death or a “Disability” (as defined below). If a named executive officer’s employment with us is terminated for any reason other than death, Disability or a Change in Control Termination, then the officer’s unvested restricted stock units and performance share units are forfeited to us for no consideration, except that (other than with respect to retention grants for Mr. Perkins, Mr. Meloy, Ms. Kneale, Mr. McDonie, Mr. Pryor and Mr. Muraro), if a named executive officer retires, the officer’s awards will continue to vest on the original vesting schedule (unless a Change in Control occurs as described above) if, from the date of the officer’s retirement or termination through the applicable vesting date, the named executive officer has either performed consulting services for us or refrained from working for one of our competitors or in a similar role for another company (however, directorships at non-competitors are permitted).
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 51 |
The following terms generally have the following meanings for purposes of the Stock Incentive Plan, Stock Agreements and Performance Agreements:
Affiliate means an entity or organization which, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, us.
∎ | Affiliate means an entity or organization which, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, us. |
Change in Control means the occurrence of one of the following events: (i) any person or group acquires or gains ownership or control (including, without limitation, the power to vote), by way of merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reorganization or otherwise, of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of our voting stock or more than 50% of the combined voting power of the equity interests in the Partnership or the General Partner, (ii) any person, including a group as contemplated by section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, acquires in any twelve-month period (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) ownership, directly or indirectly, of 30% or more of the outstanding shares of our voting stock or of the combined voting power of the equity interests in the Partnership or the General Partner, (iii) the completion of a liquidation or dissolution of us or the approval by the limited partners of the Partnership, in one or a series of transactions, of a plan of complete liquidation of the Partnership, (iv) the sale or other disposition by us of all or substantially all of our assets in one or more transactions to any person other than an Affiliate, (v) the sale or disposition by either the Partnership or the General Partner of all or substantially all of its assets in one or more transactions to any person other than to an Affiliate, (vi) a transaction resulting in a person other than Targa Resources GP LLC or an Affiliate being the General Partner of the Partnership, or (vii) as a result of or in connection with a contested election of directors, the persons who were our directors before such election shall cease to constitute a majority of our Board of Directors.
∎ | Change in Control means the occurrence of one of the following events: (i) any person or group acquires or gains ownership or control (including, without limitation, the power to vote), by way of merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reorganization or otherwise, of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of our voting stock or more than 50% of the combined voting power of the equity interests in the Partnership or the General Partner, (ii) any person, including a group as contemplated by section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, acquires in any twelve-month period (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) ownership, directly or indirectly, of 30% or more of the outstanding shares of our voting stock or of the combined voting power of the equity interests in the Partnership or the General Partner, (iii) the completion of a liquidation or dissolution of us or the approval by the limited partners of the Partnership, in one or a series of transactions, of a plan of complete liquidation of the Partnership, (iv) the sale or other disposition by us of all or substantially all of our assets in one or more transactions to any person other than an Affiliate, (v) the sale or disposition by either the Partnership or the General Partner of all or substantially all of its assets in one or more transactions to any person other than to an Affiliate, (vi) a transaction resulting in a person other than Targa Resources GP LLC or an Affiliate being the General Partner of the Partnership, or (vii) as a result of or in connection with a contested election of directors, the persons who were our directors before such election shall cease to constitute a majority of our Board of Directors. |
Disability
∎ | Disability means a disability that entitles the named executive officer to disability benefits under our long-term disability plan. |
The following table reflects amounts that would have been received by each of the named executive officers under the Stock Incentive Plan and related Stock Agreements and Performance Agreements in the event there was a Change in Control or a Change in Control Termination or their employment was terminated due to death or Disability, each as of December 31, 2020.2023. The amounts reported below assume that the price per share of our common stock was $26.38,$86.87, which was the closing price per share of our common stock on December 31, 202029, 2023 (the last trading day of fiscal 2020)year 2023). No amounts are reported assuming retirement as of December 31, 2020,2023, since additional conditions must be met following a named executive officer’s retirement in order for any restricted stock awards or restricted stock units to become vested.
Name | Change in Control | Change in Control Termination | Termination for Death or Disability | |||||||||
Joe Bob Perkins (1) | $ | 13,696,619 | $ | 20,019,361 | $ 20,019,361 | |||||||
Matthew J. Meloy (2) | 7,489,504 | 13,987,252 | 13,987,252 | |||||||||
Jennifer R. Kneale (3) | 3,691,635 | 5,826,632 | 5,826,632 | |||||||||
Patrick J. McDonie (4) | 4,519,662 | 6,103,492 | 6,103,492 | |||||||||
D. Scott Pryor (5) | 4,519,662 | 6,103,492 | 6,103,492 | |||||||||
Robert M. Muraro (6) | 5,047,318 | 6,631,149 | 6,631,149 |
Name | Change in Control | Change in Control Termination | Termination for Death or Disability | |||
Matthew J. Meloy (1) | — | $ 74,367,479 | $ 74,367,479 | |||
Jennifer R. Kneale (2) | — | 25,941,522 | 25,941,522 | |||
Patrick J. McDonie (3) | — | 18,290,757 | 18,290,757 | |||
D. Scott Pryor (4) | — | 18,290,757 | 18,290,757 | |||
Robert M. Muraro (5) | — | 18,290,757 | 18,290,757 |
43
(1) |
|
(i) $1,239,517, and $398,920, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;
(i) | $10,334,663, and $255,779, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2021, which are scheduled to vest January 19, 2024; |
(ii) $1,209,022 and $0, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, in settlement of an award under the 2017 Bonus Plan, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2021;
(ii) | $25,836,702, and $1,085,576, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2021, which have a performance period that ended on December 31, 2023 (using an estimate of a 250% payout); |
(iii) $2,144,377, and $690,135, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2018, which have an aggregate performance period that will end on December 31, 2020; however, the awards deemed “earned” were still deemed to be outstanding as of December 31, 2020, therefore a Change in Control or termination due to death or Disability could accelerate the time at which the awards could be settled with the executive;
(iii) | $5,624,659, and $90,647, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 20, 2022, which are scheduled to vest January 20, 2025; |
(iv) $2,097,104, and $385,556, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2022;
(iv) | $14,061,647, and $526,078, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 20, 2022, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2024 (using an estimate of a 250% payout); |
(v) $1,857,653, and $0, respectively, relate to the restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, in settlement of an award under the 2018 Bonus Plan, which are scheduled to vest January 17, 2022; and
Targa Resources Corp.|Proxy Statement|2 0 2 4 A N N U A L M E E T I N G O F S T O C K H O L D E R S | 52 |
(vi) $3,103,713, and $570,622, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 17, 2019, which have an aggregate performance period that will end on December 31, 2021.
(v) | $4,652,931, and $18,747, respectively, relate to restricted stock units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2023, which are scheduled to vest January 19, 2026; and |
(b)
(vi) | $11,632,327, and $247,724, respectively, relate to performance share units and related dividend rights granted on January 19, 2023, which have a performance period that will end on December 31, 2025 (using an estimate of a 250% payout). |
(2) | Of the amount reported under each of the
|